Vindman Escorted From White House After Trump’s Senate Acquittal

Have Republicans considered actually having a trial?

 

True. Trump lies constantly but is too afraid to testify under oath despite of course always claiming he wants to testify.

 

Why don’t you post the lies you claim are based on opinion. Start with attendance at the state of the union. Then perhaps Obama’s birth certificate. Then his statements about North Korea. Then his best economy in history. Then his claim he was going to insure great healthcare for all Americans. Then his claims China pays for the tariffs.

Need I go on

 

Trump can testify right after the Bidens. Oops. No he doesn’t. It’s over. It was over on day one when they brought charges and accusations based on 3rd hand knowledge because someone’s brothers sisters cousin thought he heard something.

 

Prove that he leaked anything.

 

If you can actually state what our foreign policy under Trump actually consists of that would help.

 

Guess you either weren’t paying attention or you don’t know what third hand means.

 

You mean his lie about protecting pre existing conditions while he has a lawsuit pending that would eliminate them. He and the Republican Party could have at any time passed legislation guaranteeing insurance companies could not discriminate against people with pre existing conditions and strangely enough they have not done so.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...pre-existing-conditions-record-amid-obamacare

 

What does that have to do with Trump’s lawsuit eliminating protection for pre existing conditions.

 

Would help what? Would help you decide who runs US foreign policy, Lt. Colonel Vindman or the President of the United States?

Difficult question indeed!

 

“ But first I need you to do us a favor, though”

 

Bribing a foreign government is foreign policy? Withholding military aid to get a foreign country to announce a phony investigation into a political rival is foreign policy?

Trump has no coherent or consistent foreign policy except perhaps to aid the Rise of Russian influence.

 

Is not what we're talking about. A simple question, who runs US foreign policy, Lt. Colonel Vindman or the President of the United States?

 

Long been proven, only one person used the word "demand" and that's the LT. Colonel. He or his connection to the whistleblower leaked to the Washington Post. But in the end, the efforts amounted to nothing with the President's acquittal. If he wants to fancy himself a 'hero', that's on him. But heroes don't get replaced from their jobs.

Frankly, we're learning how weak our executive branch is when these worms can just crawl to the next job, seemingly unimpeded. When you or I screw up in the private markets, we get a pink slip. This dude can continue to get paid.

 

Was it 3rd or second of 4th I paid plenty of attention. The conversation provided Zero Proof he either bribed anyone or committed quid pro quo because THEY DIDN'T CHARGE HIM WITH EITHER!!! Do you know why? Because they couldn’t prove it and had no evidence besides ones interpretation of his meaning. That’s NOT PROOF OR EVEN EVIDENCE! You don’t convict people on your opinion. You don’t impeach presidents because you don’t like them.

Was Trumps wording the best? Of course not. He doesn’t overly think when he speaks. But he was well aware plenty of people were listening in so why the hell would he purposely do what Democrats claim he did when he knew everyone would know? It makes no sense.

Now if he was maybe hiding govt correspondence on a private server then deleted 1000s of emails once it was discovered and before the FBI could get their hands on them, perhaps we’d have some actual evidence of wrong doing Or maybe if he actually stated in front of everyone what he wanted in very clear sentences and it all actually happened, like with Biden, we’d have actual evidence of quid pro quo. But Dems answer to different rules. /derp

 

Could you remind me again how he denigrated Gold Star families?

 

If he did he mis-spoke.

 

I know you may find this difficult to comprehend, but military officers are expected to support and carry out the policies of their superiors, not their own policy preferences.

 

That sounds like Sour Grapes, Debunked Narratives, and "But...Hillary..." Whataboutism.

However, I do believe in giving credit where credit is due.

You NAILED This Part:

"Was Trumps wording the best? Of course not. He doesn’t overly think when he speaks" .

^We agree as to that obvious observation.

Trump also doesn't "overly think" before he tweets.

His Imbecilic Brain Diarrhea is Unending.

He thinks the Chiefs play in Kansas and "Covfefe" is a word.

Now, back to the OP and Vindman.

It is apparent that a Draft Dodger like Trump (who commits TREASON on a daily basis) would feel threatened by an Authentic American Patriot (like Vindman).

Everyone knew that the Unstable MORON (Trump) was going to fire Vindman.

Par for the course for anything involving the Trump Trainwreck.

 

Ok...

 

Yea I guess you did miss his SOTU.

 

How could they Schiff would not allow the whistleblower to testifiy, why was he afraid of that testimony, nor any questions about it? Vindman almost did and Schiff shut him down.

 

The lawsuit is about Obamacare not pre existing conditions

 

Can't even quote right.....

 

If the subordinate engages in insubordination and goes outside the chain of command are their consequences?