A 25-year-old black man was shot dead in Georgia while jogging, prompting online protests labeling t

The Democrats.

 

A suspect in each one because of his own actions.

 

What fictional movie were you watching?

 

Who cares? When these agencies are pressured by social justice organizations they will.do whatever to appease them.

 

Again zero knowledge. You should probably stick to something you actually know about. Just some friendly advice. Take it or leave it

 

Why do you keep dodging the question of the white burglars, why didn't the McMichaels run them down.

 

Southern Democrats and Republicans.

 

I have plenty of knowledge. WTF are you babbling about?

 

Are the whites suspects as well?

 

Dupe

 

Mississippi Burning

 

America has never appeased black folks.

 

Were the whites entering the home burglars or not?

 

Apparently not as it relates to the GBI.

 

Looks like its time for another lesson with the dictionary.

break in

verb
broke in; broken in; breaking in; breaks in
Definition of break in (Entry 2 of 2)

intransitive verb

1: to enter something (such as a building or computer system) without consent or by force

He absolutely trespassed so your laughable attempt to shy away from the term break in was easily shut down.

 

Exactly. That's the difference between actually knowing the definition of words and pretending to.

 

Ok, let's break this down;

1. The area had suffered a series of previous crimes in recent months, the theft of a pistol, rifles and fishing gear, enough to justify the need for CCTV at the unfinished houses which had suffered thefts of tools etc. This not only justifies the accused confronting a potential suspect but for assuming he was armed.

2. The previous encounter with the neighbour and the suspect means that the 2 accused had a description of a potential suspect which fitted that of the Arbery. Not only that but he had reached into his shorts when challenged suggesting he was armed (and remember, given the previous items stolen it was reasonable to assume he was armed).

3. Arbery had a previous history of theft and firearms offences. We will never know why he went into the unfinished house but his behaviour is extremely suspicious (the idea that he was looking for a drink seems spurious, was the water even connected? Either way it is pure supposition).

4. From a legal point of view Arbery's actions certainly constitute reasonable grounds to suspect him as a burglar. It is irrelevant if he walked in or broke in, it is irrelevant if he stole anything, he certainly entered as a trespasser into a house which actually had a 'No trespassing' sign on it. Irrelevant if the house was occupied or not.

5. Therefore the accused had every justification for stopping him and detaining him for the police. He fitted the description of the suspect for previous crimes in the same area, they had every reason to believe he would be armed, he had fled upon being challenged after criminal trespassing, he was a reasonably suspected burglar which is a felony in Georgia, justifying a citizen's arrest.

6. We see the accused confronting him and hear it on the 9/11 calls. If the accused intended to murder him it really beggars belief that they would call the police to summon them to the area and provide a blow by blow account of their attempts to detain him?

7. When we see the video the accused with the shotgun has it pointed downwards and is not threatening Arbery. The 2nd accused can be heard on the audio begging Arbery to stop what he is doing.

8. It is only when Arbery advances towards the first accused and tries to wrestle the shotgun out of his hands that he is shot. I appreciate that he must have been scared and thought his life was in imminent danger but the same applies to the first accused.

9. The first DA decided there was no case for the accused to answer. He rightfully recused himself when it was pointed out that he was linked to the accused but the second DA reached the same conclusion. It was only when the footage was released that misinformed public opinion forced the 3rd DA to charge the accused. This gives them plenty of grounds to appeal, citing misconduct on the part of the 3rd DA.

10. Really this seems a classic case of caving in to public opinion and the fear of African Americans rioting which twists the justice system so it is warped by political correctness rather than the evidence. Everyone should read Stacey Koon's account of the Rodney King arrest and come away with a real idea of what is going on here.

 

Thank you for the quote.
On the 911 call Travis said it was the left pocket. Since that is a recording of his first hand account with the 911 operator, I would guess that the difference is either like the whisper game or the story changed.

The part about the "spooking" Travis makes sense as well. It sounds like Travis lied on that 911 call. He claimed he was driving by. He was probably outside and got spooked and ran back home to call daddy, grab a gun, then get his truck. That would explain why he was so out of breath on the 911 call.

So Travis was scared into running home instead of talking to the guy. Chicken Travis then felt like a tough guy with his gun when he chased Arbery around the neighborhood like a wannabe cop.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000007142853/ahmaud-arbery-video-911-georgia.html

Interesting representation of the timeline.

 

Travis lost his gun.
The fishing gear went missing from a boat that may not have even been in Brunswick at the time.
Rifles? First I heard of this. Was this Travis as well? Could you link?

 

I highlighted the part of the definition you keep missing.

 

The GBI is exactly what I mean.

 

The only one on record was TM's pistol being stolen.

None of which can be confirmed.

The man had cameras in his home and not ONE time did Arbery take anything or was he seen leaving that house with anything. That throws out that BS Was the white folks that entered the unfinished house suspicious? Evidently it was if they homeowner thinks he was drinking it.

So why weren't the white folks who were entering the house not seen as burglary suspects?

No he didn't, it wasn't even his house.

How is that when no one ever saw who stole TM's pistol or the fishing equipment.

Why because he was black.

They never saw him, so how do you know that.

Please post the video of him and Arbery confronting each other, that is a lie.

Why would it?

You don't know what he was doing, we can't even hear what is being said.

The man was in fear that if he took off running he would be shot in the back, which is what any reasonable person would be thinking.

Because he was covering for a man he knew.

Same thing pretty much, all of these folks run in the same circles and they were covering from him.

You should changed that name from Reasonable Bob to D.............nevermind.

 

He won't, most that crap he is just pulling from the 4th POC.

 

The VICTIM is pushing up daisies. There. Fixed it for ya!