A 25-year-old black man was shot dead in Georgia while jogging, prompting online protests labeling t

Despite your rubbish delusions they don't have to, RGTS and immediate knowledge.

 

1. They didn't assault anyone, Arbery attacked Travis and was shot whilst struggling to take his gun off him.

2. No, that's the words of a coward who is running away because they know they are losing an argument.

 

Yes because in both cases I believe in justice and that people should not be judged by the colour of their skin (or uniform).

 

Is that a threat? A person who doesn't believe in equality and justice and that everyone should be answerable for their actions is contemptible.

No, there is no excuse for the behaviour of violent black criminals in this country. Or the incredible lack of empathy for the poor police officers who must combat them.

 

Maybe you need a lesson in how to be a good neighbour?

 

I've watched the videos, it is pretty obvious you haven't watched the videos of the white burglars since you don't want to tell us how they entered the house.

 

Doesn't matter how they entered, just that they did so as trespassers with intent to steal.

 

No you are dealing with assumptions, you AssUMe what his intent was. You don't post what the intent of the white burglars was. You AssUMe stole Travis's gun and you don't have a shred of evidence to prove it. Greg McMichael NEVER saw Arbery before that tragic afternoon, but you claim he was lawful in grabbing his gun and chasing him.

I would have told them to GFT.

What's the use.

They are in jail because they committed murder.

 

So why aren't they burglary suspects in all of these so called neighborhood break ins.

 

They are.

 

1. I don't assume, I have reasonable grounds to suspect. How is the intent of the white burglars an issue? I take it you're trying to say that they assumed Arbery stole Travis' pistol, not the case but that fact that a gun was stolen during a previous theft by the suspect who had previously intimated he was armed justifies them carrying weapons. You're quite correct but he did resemble the suspect.

2. But you wouldn't have attacked them and tried to wrestle their gun away

3. That's a coward's reply, habeas corpus or quit the field

4. They're in jail to appease the mob and to avoid what we're seeing in Minneapolis.

 

RR's arguments are going to keep the McMichaels in jail forever.

 

How so?

 

this thread

 

not according to GA law.

No chance. They may both plead to manslaughter, but that's the best they can hope for. The video and their own statements have hung them.

 

not according to the video, or the statements from McMichaels.

 

we have video of it happening, lol.

not according to GA law.

 

That isn't enough to affect a citizens arrest. the GA statute is quite clear on that.

not according to GA law.

 

it's entirely irrelevant. Where he lived or why he was jogging there is completely irrelevant to the fact that McMichaels had no legal authority, per the GA statute, to try and detain him. It's why they are in jail.

 

in order to refute it, you would have to show the GA statute is incorrect, the video was faked and McMichaels lied to the police.

 

and they had neither, as has already been established.

 

you can in no way substantiate this claim

 

Habeas corpus or quit the field?

 

1. Of course I can

2. Dad never even fired a shot and Travis shot Arbery after he attacked him and attempted to wrestle his gun off him. Their statements and video had 2 separate DAs decide they had no case to answer before public opinion warped the system.

 

Yes they do.