Lancet Study - Full Lockdowns Not Associated With Significant Reductions In Mortality

The whole point of lockdown was to kill as many people as possible.
They knew very well that people without movement and physical activity die much sooner from the flu and common cold..
That is exactly why they have closed parks and beaches first.

 

Rot and nonsense.

 

That was MARCH 8....when there was a severe mask shortage

If you didn't use that quote you would find some other rationalization for your desire to spread this disease by not wearing a mask

 

Did you get that from QAnon?

It's bullshit

 

And that's why vulnerable lives are the ones to stay home, its really not rocket science.

 

It looks like you are supporting an organized population reduction, (aka people killing).

 

It "looks like" you're spouting QAnon bullshit

 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/406551#:~:text=This report assesses the role,and depression; contributes to the
Why then parks and beaches were closed, without ANY justification or research?

 

You have zero evidence that reduction in physical activity and forcing people to close confinements increases an immunity and improves general health.

 

Did not Fauci & Co strongly suggest that locking down was going to "flatten the curve"?

 

This should be in the conspiracy theory forum. BTW: Who is "they"?

 

I do not know, and I do not have to know who are making those stupid orders.
You can call it conspiracy or whatever, I do not care, the end result is the same, people are dying for no reason.

 

The narrative has changed more than one changes underwear in a week. People can’t make up their minds.

 

yup, we were locked down in April and May and look at the high number of deaths.

thanks for posting this. Oh, were you not paying attention to what the chart shows?

 

Sure, it shows the number of cases going down because of the lockdown and now going back up because we stopped.
What do you think it shows.

 

deaths much higher during the 2 month lockdowns from a virus that takes up to 2 weeks but as little as 3 days for symptoms to appear. Hmmmmmmmm

 

The science is a science only when it fits the progressive/antiTrump agenda.
Everything else is not a science.
Because we opened up, the number of deaths went down and continue to go down.

 

But not with lowered mortality rates.

 

LOL.

 

That does seem to be the case.

So open up the bars and restaurants, and concert's and as you leave to go home holler out that black lives matter so defund the cops and its all good
.

 

Isn't that the same as saying minimizing exposure does not work with this virus ?

Seems like any science that says that is junk science.

In Ms. all our intensive care units are full. So us opening back up didnt matter? What we tried to avoid, the overload, happened as we opened back up.

I think common sense just gave science a black eye. What good is science when it can't agree with other science?

Astounding. So if your science contradicts common sense go with common sense. For figures don't lie but these liars can figure.

 

We have to wait CDC data.
Worldmeter run be progressives (those are people with altered mentality) I do not believe them
By the way dail,y deaths means nothing, if it is withing boundaries of moving averages.
CDC at least give some perspective what is a seasonal average death rate.
Also definition of death from coronavirus is still shady, it is not very scientific.

 

Those reports about overwhelmed intensive care units mostly lie.

 

So if the CDC found that COVID death counts were undercounted, based on comparison to seasonally adjusted death rates, you'd accept that? BTW, Worldmeter uses the same numbers as the CDC does.

 

This was reported today on local news that isn't left wing in a red state.

So its credible. Last weekend my RN daughter said they were sending people 500 miles away to find an open intensive care. She didn't lie.

Of course we lost lots of small hospitals as the chains took over. We once had 3/hospitals here. Now we have one a big chain.