Newly leaked video appears to show a UFO flying and disappearing underwater off California https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/leaked-navy-video-appears-show-u-f-o-california-coast-n1267688?cid=eml_nbn_20210517&user_email=31538fe77b084701975d9091aa0bbf4ef284dc0ddf7d4abb252027c596581efa&$3p=e_sailthru&_branch_match_id=857693951420692326&utm_medium=Email Sailthru Saw this on TV. Interesting shape.. The Pentagon calls this "unidentified Arial phenomena."
. Tucker Carlson had an interesting report about UFOs at the beginning of his FOX TV show tonight [which is usually repeated later - midnight central time.] .
It's a wild phenomenon. We're so used to UFO claims being pure woo, we're conditioned not to take this sort of thing seriously and worry about how others will look at us if we do. I think this is why people in government and military alike are loath to take it seriously. Check this out, though: ^ Pilots discussing what they have experienced and the evidence available.
Not leaked, released. This is disclosure and it has been going on for a few years now, little by little. Many pilots have now been interviewed about these UFOs on network programs. This never would have been allowed even 10 years ago. But Harry Reid obtained funding for a secret ten-year Pentagon study of UFOs, and here they are! https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html
Denial became the official position because to admit such a thing, or to admit that they didn't know what it was 70 years ago would have been disastrous. Allen Hynek, a professor of Astronomy from Northwestern U,.who was hired as the official government debunker, turned on the government and became the defacto father of ufology, He made up bunk explanation for UFOs until he could no longer deny the reality of what he found. But he was originally paid to explain away UFO events with any explanation he could manage. He is the one who invented the swamp gas explanation, which became a running joke.
UFOs, as anyone who has taken a serious, unprejudiced look into it knows, are a real phenomena. Thanks for posting this. If you are interested in seeing more, you might find the series Unidentified, informative. I, personally only watched the 1st half-dozen episodes, but that's because the main idea of the show is getting highly credible witnesses to come forward, presumably to rehab the image of a UFO-spotter as some moonshine-soaked hick, & I didn't need further convincing. But I think the fourth episode (1st season) has the interview with fmr. Senate Majority leader Harry Reid, as well as a meeting with military intelligence officers in Italy, where they have apparently been trying to shoot them down. I know it seems incredible-- and indeed, there are probably more mistaken or faked sightings than real ones...but there are genuine ones. While this story greatly outweighs any other news of the day, it's a slow-burner, until the common citizen can accept the idea (unless our visitors decide to raise their profile).
What do you mean "Or"? We don't know what it is so it is simply a UFO by definition. Well, it shows the camera panning across the shape (making relative motion impossible to determine) and the shape flashing before disappearing around the horizon (which was reportedly over water). Interesting? It appears as an indistinct blob. Whatever shape it actually was apparently couldn't be resolved by the equipment.
Expect a lot more of these. It looks like the extra terrestrials found out about Joe Bidens unlimited open borders and now they are coming for their free stuff
Why do you think it would have been disastrous to admit it 70 years ago? I don't disagree. I'm just curious about your reasons behind the statement.
Seems that anyone that mocks the POSSIBILITY/ PROBABILITY of this phenomena is limiting their thinking and awareness. There are plenty of phenomena that are yet to be explained scientifically ......... This falls into the category and wonder of discovery. & knowledge enhancement.
Well, there is a lot to mock when it comes to claims of UFOs and aliens, unfortunately. That there is so much woo and so many hoaxes involved makes it harder to take this stuff seriously all of a sudden. It's important to keep in mind that military encounters with strange objects should not be classed the same way as the decades of misidentifications of Venus, birds, planes and swamp gas or all of the blurry, fake UFO photos out there. This is a specific phenomenon that bears investigation. Approaching it scientifically, we also have to assume the most mundane, most probable explanation is the correct one, so it's probably not Eadora's cousins
The source of the information is very important.......Let's face it......some folks are subject to hallucination and making unsubstantiated claims. Others interpret sightings in mythical terms. The military and airline pilots are usually pretty credible......as they are trained to deal with logic and facts.
Bottom line: this stuff was DOCUMENTED by the Belgian Air Force in 1990. Belgium is part of NATO, so they weren't to be dismissed lightly. UFO Sightings in Belgium, 1990 - YouTube A similar craft was spotted by hundreds in Arizona in 1997 Inside The Phoenix Lights UFO Incident Of 1997 (allthatsinteresting.com) And let's not forget what went down over the Pentagon in 1952 When UFOs Buzzed the White House and the Air Force Blamed the Weather - HISTORY This stuff has been old hat for 2 generations and counting.....lives have been disrupted and destroyed by a foolish infrastructure hell bent on maintaining "normalcy" in business and religion.
I find it interesting that in an age when virtually everyone carries around a high quality still and video camera with them at all times, we are still seeing the same grainy, blobby, indistinct pictures that we were looking at 50 years ago.
Well the thing is that they are only identified as unknown because of the way they move....and they simply move too fast for decent images. Round the 6 min mark he discusses what these unidentified craft are capable of
Exactly, the video looks like a very amateur creation. They are NEVER in high definition and/or a sharp image. It's like the Loch Ness monster hysteria.
There are plenty of very clear videos and photos. And what about Navy fighter pilot videos do you find unreliable?
