Um... you do realize the Supreme Court isn't the one who are supposed to be making laws like this? Hmm... maybe it's because that's not actually the will of the people?
FoxHastings said: ↑ And you've been told that NO Democrat says the Supreme court makes laws... However , YOU DO ...here's a sentence from your OP: ""The Supreme court makes law."" Then learn punctuation.....and you are still wrong...NO Democrat told you that the Supreme Court makes laws... HEY, want to get back on topic????
Singer wants women to keep that choice up to the point a child is self supporting. I suppose you think she should have that choice! Choice does not hint at if an issue is right or wrong. Give you an example. There are plenty of humans that believe that the Feds have no right to remove money from them. Guess who fights against that kind of argument? The free choicer's fight that.
FoxHastings said: ↑ Good GAWD,,, the "people" do create laws through their elected representatives...sheesh , get a book on civics! The Supreme court IS "the people"... I never indicated that....are you still trying to avoid the rape issue by claiming a poster said something they didn't say ? But it is ...
then remove them, if they are self-supporting, at the point they are self-supporting it's called a c-section but according to republicans it's 26 weeks, not 15 http://www.slate.com/id/2120872/ "a member of President Bush's Council on Bioethics, describes in his book The Ethical Brain, current neurology suggests that a fetus doesn't possess enough neural structure to harbor consciousness until about 26 weeks, when it first seems to react to pain. Before that, the fetal neural structure is about as sophisticated as that of a sea slug and its EEG as flat and unorganized as that of someone brain-dead."
Another attempt to AVOID that old rape issue ....and nothing else... According to kaz you shouldn't be bringing in subjects that are NOT in the OP...so you better stop or he'll get mad
if this law excluded rape victims, you would have a point, it does not, the law would apply to them too
FoxHastings said: ↑ Another attempt to AVOID that old rape issue ....and nothing else... According to kaz you shouldn't be bringing in subjects that are NOT in the OP...so you better stop or he'll get mad Nice attempt at a dodge but raped women get impregnated and that may involve an abortion....it is ALL about the topic of restricting abortion.
I opened up saying my view. Now you said yours. And it is not my view in the Court. Yours is to be decided by the Supreme Court. Are you truly accusing the Supreme Court of accepting Rape? I never have accepted rape.
The problem is: IF Anti-Choicers make an exception for a rape victim they are HYPOCRITES. IF they don't make an exception , they appear to be cruel and inhumane.....
I'll talk about how stupid restrictions affect rape victims wherever I want to... Keep ducking, it shows hou have no argument...
What law? This is what is before the Supreme Court of the nation. The court said Monday it would review next term whether all state laws that ban pre-viability abortions are unconstitutional. The court's 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade declared that a woman has a constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy in the first six months of her pregnancy when the fetus is incapable of surviving outside the womb. The test case is from Mississippi, which bans most abortions after 15 weeks, significantly before fetal viability. A panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative in the country, blocked enforcement of the law, finding it in conflict with Roe v. Wade and subsequent abortion decisions. https://www.npr.org/2021/05/17/997478374/supreme-court-to-review-mississippi-abortion-ban Do you see Rape as an approved crime?????
If you would stop ducking by making things up about a crime. The issue of Rape is not before the Supreme Court. You made that up.
FoxHastings said: ↑ The problem is: IF Anti-Choicers make an exception for a rape victim they are HYPOCRITES. IF they don't make an exception , they appear to be cruel and inhumane..... True!
