I can't promise this but so far Rape is not the issue before the Supreme Court. Why not discuss the stuff actually in the Supreme Court?
it's something the Supreme Court should consider in deciding, as it would be inhumane to force rape victims to have their rapists babies
FoxHastings said: ↑ I'll talk about how stupid restrictions affect rape victims wherever I want to... Keep ducking, it shows you have no argument... WHAT am I allegedly making up about crime? I know, that's just another INCONVENIENT question YOU CAN'T ANSWER. I NEVER said it was....YOU made that up.
Because it affects RAPED women who may get pregnant....your TOTAL LACK OF concern for victims of that heinous crime is NOTED...how inhumane!!!!
FoxHastings, I from here forward will never reply to your bloviated posts. When you load the forum with hundreds of thousands of blank lines, you want attention and not conversation.
if the SC allows these laws to stand, it will mean rape victims are forced to have their rapists babies
Show us the Mississippi law you clearly are having a fit over. Show one statement by me approving raping women? You can't.
When a woman is raped, nobody should support that crime in any fashion. I do not support the rapists. If women did not understand the way babies happen, time to teach them.
babies are born fetus can grow into babies, some times they are aborted naturally or medically someone else can support a newborn if the mother chooses not too, no one can force her to breastfeed
FoxHastings said: ↑ I'll talk about how stupid restrictions affect rape victims wherever I want to... Keep ducking, it shows you have no argument... DUHHH, the issue is NOT the crime of rape AND I NEVER SAID IT WAS........the issue is women who are impregnated by rape....something you obviously don't give a crap about... The problem is: IF Anti-Choicers make an exception for a rape victim they are HYPOCRITES. IF they don't make an exception , they appear to be cruel and inhumane.....
FreshAir said: ↑ if the SC allows these laws to stand, it will mean rape victims are forced to have their rapists babies Can you tell me what your post has to do with the one you quoted????? WHO TF said this law was "good for rapists" ?? Ya, more questions for you to dodge and duck
I am not the sole person to ask you to stick to the topic. Read the OP for the reminder of what this topic is only about.
. So what? Who cares.. The OP is about sleaze bags who want pregnant women FORCED to gestate...even those WHO HAVE BEEN RAPED....PUNISHING THEM FOR BEING RAPED.
the republicans majority court was fine, not the new court stacked with far right judges due to a rule change to 50 votes by republicans I do hope dems get the votes to add seats to the court and use the 50 votes to seat new judges
the next step is to make it harder to get in that timeframe, vaginal ultrasounds, waiting periods, ect... 15 weeks is not a lot of time for a rape victim to get an abortion
FoxHastings said: ↑ . So what? Who cares.. The OP is about sleaze bags who want pregnant women FORCED to gestate...even those WHO HAVE BEEN RAPED....PUNISHING THEM FOR BEING RAPED. What has that to do with the post of mine you quoted? Nothing. Just another dodge.
