I was born and raised in NY. Traveled the world in the military. Escaped CA just in time. Did my research looking for a solid Republican town with great medical, great restaurants, great shopping and most of all great people. Near the beach. With lots of space for recreational shooting too. No, I wasn't born in Texas. But I'm much more Texan than some that were, like the communist flake gun grabber running for Governor named Beto. I've spent years at Ft Hood and Ft Bliss so I'm not really new here either.
So that's an "I was in the street rioting" eh? Kinda stings when I hit the mark, doesn't it? Pobrecito
When we were dating, my wife told me she was a hooker... she knew I'd never marry her if I found out she was a lawyer.
Gringo, the liberal who accused me of storming the capitol. No one was talking to you o wise and learned one.
Oh... So? Now it is "pretty much" everyone? Well, that ISN'T "everyone"... That said--It is good to hear that places exist where people could have $20,000 siting on their kitchen table and teenage daughters running around naked and never feel the need to lock their doors... I have always locked my doors out of habit, even when I lived in the safest city possible... But, once again, it is awesome to know that such crime-free utopias exist. Anyway, back on-topic to KR: Now that KR has become a God-Like Nascot to the Gun-Totihf Extreme RW, how soon before he runs for Congress? Will he make his first bid, when he turns 25, in 2028? Or will he wait a few years?
I can only speak for where I live. Here few lock anything. Most people have multiple vehicles in the driveway unlocked with keys in the ignition. You must live in a strange place where people’s teenage daughters run around the locked house naked. One more reason I’m thankful I live where I do. That sounds crazy. On KR, I couldn’t care less if he runs or not. I can’t affect whether he does or not. Nor will his running or not running affect me in any way. Total waste of time and energy worrying about it.
Oh so now it's the JURY. Why do you keep ignoring the evidence. And juries are sat in one day routinely and you are only talking voir dire, their reviewing of the jurors starts long before that. And both sides have contest to jurors. The FACT remains, the prosecutor had NOTHING to support the charges, even the best prosecutor in the country could not have changed that fact. What is disturbing is that you are advocating for a conviction you claim would have happened based on a prosecutors personality rather than the evidence here. And yes you want to hire an attorney WHO KNOWS THE LAW and WHO KNOWS PRECIDENT. But bottom line is when that jury gets into the jury room to deliberated you better have the facts and the evidence on your side.
You're wasting your time. Lib handlers say Rittenhouse was guilty... so it must be so. The fact that there was no evidence to that effect and lots to disprove it, the fact that even the survivor that was shot said Rittenhouse acted in self defense... despite all that, the lib handlers say he was guilty. And the lib handlers overrule juris prudence now. Don't bother them with FACTS.
I never get why progressive folk are always worried about the sexual arousal of others.. in public... eww...
Which is what that ****ing post says o erudite one. Try reading what's written there a few times to yourself. Try following the arrow of the quoted posts until you find the post from the poster, GRINGO, who I was talking to in the first place when you butted in with your asinine posts that clearly show you are confused.
Again: YOU DON"T SAY!?!?!?!? I never claimed you did, you butted in to an exchange I was having with the poster who did and you've been pestering me in more than one thread ever since. You're confused.
Same here, I laugh, I have like $20ish in the center console in plain site and in 42 years I have never locked my vehicle around town shopping, eating or at the gym and have NEVER had any of it stolen... God I love Wyoming
