FoxHastings said: ↑ You agreed a fetus has no rights. If it has no rights it has no rights. It has no right to not be killed. And women have rights. Oh, and about asking you things, I have asked and when the questions were not to your liking you ignored them or claimed you didn't understand them.....which is odd since my English surpasses yours.. e.g. """Where is I don't believe him unborn child has""
which is why I don't consider miscarriages manslaughter. I still don't think it should be killed on purpose though. And that's the hill you have to climb. well everyone has rights but I don't see how that means you get the terminate pregnancy no you played logic trap games and I played right back.
Actually you haven't. I said the pregnant woman's body is literally trying to kill the fetus throughout the whole pregnancy. 1. You claim fetuses have rights. 2. Which is why abortion is murder. 3. By that standard miscarriage is manslaughter. Because you have not yet answered it.
GAuide me to the #. Nope. It is 100% true. I thought you liked science and thus expected you to know it. So, you are pro-abortion afterall. Good. Where?
Then you don't believe everyone has rights. So "logic " is a trap for you ? Ya, it sure looked that way .. No, you dodged and ducked every question, every fact... but I guess that's your idea of "playing" ...
The best way to avoid facts and logic , for you, is to stand outside them and act confused.....you did a great job avoiding facts and logic by acting confused but I don't think it was all acting... And NOW I'd like to know why YOU think straightforward questions about you position on abortion are considered , by YOU, to be traps. AND, of course, you can provide NO PROOF that these questions were traps nor explain why you think they were......just like all your other claims, baseless.
no you already responded to it if you didn't read it the first time you're probably not going to read it any subsequent times. Doubt. Your insistence means nothing. you can't even guess like properly. No Previously in the forum
Noticed your two posts to Fox -- is this the new debate style .. twirling around crying "What What What"
Inability to find an argument was the point .. . That you can't seem to find one .. doing nothing but crying "What What What" and nothing else. Just an observation .. no need to get testly.
Just because what you see in the mirror is as you describe .. no reason to think everyone else has the same issue.
Trump should say he identifies as all pro choicers moms and say he wants an abortion. That would shut them up because they would not know what to do when it was their life. The left is selfish like that.
There is only one problem; In order to be pro-choice you have to have been born... But, it is hardly surprising that an anti-abortionist does not know the difference between born and fetus.
We should tell the anti-abortionists to let their underaged children have sex with the creeps "because one day they will be old enough to consent and it is not like their DNA changes from childhood to adulthood." Oh wait... They already kind of do that already by sending their kids to the church choir, don't they?
If the fetus is a person with full rights (as you believe), you should consider miscarriages manslaughter because otherwise you are being inconsistent.
So you can do all accidental death and death of natural causes is manslaughter? You really have no idea how to argue your position best thing you can do is not speak and let other people that are smarter than you do it.