Disney Executive Producer Admits to ‘Gay Agenda,’ ‘Adding Queerness’ Wherever She Could

Biology will sort all of that out regardless of who shows what in their movies. This is as stupid as the satanic panic when people thought Ozzy Osbourne was making kids kill themselves.

 

Go watch an old Disney movie. Everyone has a parent who is dead. Even Bambi.

 

Children change all the time and are easily impressed by things they see on tv/internet. Hence why 5 year olds will wear a woody shirt, lunchbox, bag, pants, socks, etc... I want to be the next LeBron. I want to be the next Power Ranger. etc....

 

Depends what you consider little. Every gay person I’ve met said they knew pretty early, and always by puberty. Or is a 12/13yo not a kid anymore?

 

OKAY, GROOMERS: ‘I was just wherever I could adding queerness:’ Christopher Rufo has video from Disney’s all-hands meeting.

See, we just thought we were getting entertained. We didn't realize that by watching you are signing up for child indoctrination.

She's an evangelist with an agenda.

​

Social engineering systematically by means of deliberately over representing favored groups.

Blue Anon:

Well, what does one expect from an "Activism Partner"?

Is attendance to meetings like this mandated?

The Indoctrination Tracker.

From Happiest Place on Earth to Most Indoctrinated Place On Earth. What a business model. $35 just to park your car, before you walk up and pay several hundred dollars to enter for the indoctrination.

We don't need to recreate things, we just need to take the formerly good things and disindoctrinate them.

 

And they figure out they aren’t before they try to dunk a basketball or battle (insert power ranger villain here). You’d have a point if Disney was only showing gay characters, but they aren’t.

 

Why do you believe this? What happens if we don't "cut back" to around 4 billion people? And how did you arrive at that number? Why not 5 billion or 3 billion?

 

Why are they even discussing sexual matters with these children, you tell me what is the purpose?

 

Your interpretation of the bill doesn’t seem to reflect the actual language of said bill. You can take that how you wish.

 

Your world must be very small if you feel that the only people that would support this are gay people. We would have no problems at all exposing our children to Disney TV shows or movies that had characters with gay relationships on par with what you see with Micky and Minnie. I think if you have a problem with it simply don't let you kids watch. As a parent you are going to have to give them exposure at some point and regardless of Disney you are going to have to make a decision sooner or later. By the time they are tweens and teens they will be watching shows on the CW where almost every other character is gay. You can again shelter them from that too but then what about when they go to college? Are they old enough at that point? How you wish to bring up your kids is your choice. The last thing I will do is tell you how to raise your children.

 

Does have a gay character mean sexual matters are being discussed?

Does having a heterosexual character mean the same?

 

How does seeing a gay person teach kids sexual matters anymore than a straight person does?

 

Lol Ok. Well call me a nationalist but I would prefer that the shitty cultures are the ones doing the "cut backs"

 

Lmk if anyone answers this, I haven’t even seen an attempt yet

 

Funny thing is those shitty cultures are the ones emulating what you think ours should be lol
Less rights for women and high birth rates. Maybe you just don’t like western culture?

 

In order to showcase a character is gay, you can't just say "I'm Jimmy the gay" You'd have to showcase it. Like instead of Aladin kissing the princess at the end, he kisses the genie.

 

1. Agreed, kids change their mind and heros quickly. Hence why I don't support any encouraging kids to declare they are gay /gender switch / etc... because they are developing and changing
2. I disagree with your point about it only being effective if every character is gay. Some kids like the Green Power Ranger, some kids like the Pink power ranger. It didn't require an all female cast to get some girls interested in power rangers, just a pink power ranger. Also depending on how the show focuses on characters, some get advance story lines and others just appear as filler.

 

So we shouldn’t show kids anyone with a sexual orientation?

 

I think that's up to the parents and content providers. Just pointing out that television does influence children greatly.

 

I love our freedoms for sure. I love capitalism. I love many things about our culture. But shoving gay characters in Disney cartoons wouldn't be one of them.

 

They’ve had gay characters before and not had them kiss anyone. Do your research

 

I think you kind dodged answering that one.

 

How do you SHOW sexual orientation?

 

They been doing it for awhile now. Onward had a lesbian cop, and she didn’t have to scissor anyone for it to shown she’s gay.

 

Kissing would be an indication, a point you just made.