So she never said anything about "Jewish space lasers"? You all made that up like everything else y'all go on about?...lol
You've already been given one in this thread. Meanwhile, what exactly was conservative about Trump? Was it when his serial adultery? His attacks on free market principles? His outrageous deficit spending? His attacks on free speech?
She didn't use that phrase, but yes, she did talk about the possibility that our wildfires were caused by a Jewish organization using beams from their satellites. It happened. I'm sorry you weren't paying attention.
I'm to the right of you on economics. Yet another "conservative" Trump follower who can't back up his claims. You asked for an example and I gave you one. Now you are pretending you can't read it. Meanwhile, I can't help but notice that I've answered your question while you haven't answered any of mine. It's a familiar pattern, though.
Not at all. Both men had their serious faults, of course, but Buckley Jr. tried to help maintain a tradition of an ideological, intellectual grounding for conservativism.
If you are a Trump supporter? Then, yes. I'm to the right of you on economics. There's a reason I can discuss it and you can't.
I voted Libertarian last time. And the time before. I've spilled more ink defending capitalism than you will ever spend on any other issue in your entire life.
I think Goldwater would in this abortion war let the woman decide. Your examples are out of context in this whole abortion issue. The 1, 2 or 3 that may happen every year in this country is a statistical anomaly. Apparently, you don’t believe in the second tenet of traditional conservatism. Keeping government out of a citizen’s private business and lives. Basically, small government. It seems you want government control over a citizen’s private business and lives. That makes you a religious or social conservative. Although I think the word conservative doesn’t belong behind the words religious and or social. Not when that person wants government control. A government telling people what they can and can’t do in their private business and lives.
The woman is a QANON believer, is crass and rude, disruptive, not fulfilling her duties as a Congress critter by all accounts and spends most of her time fleecing her flock - which SHOULD upset you more than any democrat because, like Trump she is siphoning off money from a more legitimate candidate without putting it back into the party itself BTW - what is her party platform? I mean apart from Trolling and speaking out against the “Gazpacho” police
Keeping the government out of our private lives doesn't mean it should be legal to kill a child after it's been born.
If she's voting against the communist agenda, she doing exactly what her constituents elected her to do.
She can't even spell the word communist. But keep supporting her lunatic conspiracy theories. The only difference between her and a crazy on the street corner screeching to the sky that the CIA is monitoring his thoughts is the dye job.