Biden calls 9mm ‘high-caliber weapons,’ suggests banning them

I don't think he knows what year it is or who he is half the time.

He declared war in Russia and the Whitehouse staff had to take it back

 

That’s because they’re activist judges.

 

Oh yeh, get that a lot in the philosophy section!

 

From his bully pulpit, his 'opinions' are seen as factual by the many gullible subjects.

For those with open and curious minds, his opinions show how out of touch the government is with reality.

 

The question is do you know WHY? I know why and posted the reasons why multiple times and you guys simply ignore them.
Guess what, if you want to see a much much larger racial disparity, check out the disparity in white and black arrest for carjackings. Is that difference down to racism?

There is a reason that you live in a white neighborhood and WILL NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES live in a black neighborhood. Your actions indicate that YOU think blacks are more likely to victimize you. Perhaps you have looked at the latest FBI violent crimes data to come to that conclusion. Who knows? What we do know is YOUR ACTIONS demonstrate your prejudice and therefor your words are meaningless.

This is what confuses me about liberal whites, they are fully aware that inner city black neighborhoods are some of the most dangerous places on the planet but pretend that it is some kind of police conspiracy. Blacks were responsible for 55% of all murders in 2021 when in 2014 they were responsible for 52% of all murders (a 3% increase in 7 years). Most of these black killers are lifelong repeat offenders that progressive DAs refuse to imprison UNTIL they murder somebody. The problem IS systemic racism but not the kind you are expressing. In white conservative neighborhoods, predators go to prison immediately.... there are serious consequences for lower level crime. In black inner city progressive neighborhoods, it is always catch and release. Our predators are in prison while in progressive black neighborhoods their predators are free to pillage until they begin killing people. THAT IS THE REAL SYSTEMIC RACISM.... and it is 100% PROGRESSIVE WHITE SYSTEMIC RACISM.

 

So do you disagree with him then?

 

Again, marijuana was made illegal so that the government could attack minority groups that were causing them issues. What are you not getting here?

There is a victim in a carjacking. There is no victim in having a weed growing on your property.

I didn’t live in any area because of the color of my neighbors skin. I picked a gated area that has good school district and mature trees. I have a black neighbor beside me and one two house across the street. Several Asian neighbors of various descents and even a Hawaiian that recently moved to the area. Out of all my neighbors the one that causes everyone the most trouble is a divorced white woman.

So because some blacks cause issues you are fine with them being systematically attacked by laws that were designed to incarcerate them, causing only further decay of their families?

Because unless that is your thought what does anything you just posted have to do with the quote on why marijuana was targeted so heavily unless you are just wanting to rant about black people?

If you don’t like the laws of progressive areas, don’t live there — I don’t. But that has nothing to do with federal programs designed to target minorities nationwide.

 

Yes I do.


Political cartoon of the day: Deaf and Dumb
Check back each day to see them all!
Fox News
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

• • 
    next
    Image 1 of 486
    
    
    Deaf and Dumb 06.04.22 ( )

 

Because it is the freedom upon which all others are preserved.

 

You don't seriously take it that people are armed to protect their freedoms do you?

When has that ever happened in this country? And no you don't get to list the Revolutionary War.

 

If you believe the second amendment (or at least the part you are seizing on) is absolute — please explain how background checks are legal, or how it is legal to deny a 15 year old to purchase one, or denying a felon from purchasing one, or have some weapons are banned or restricted.

 

Not all citizens have all rights.

 

That is completely absurd. No where in the constitution or any written paper has this ever been expressed.

If the government wants to take your rights away, they will. If you try to prevent this with your precious toys then they will take your life.
For examples see the hundreds of times an innocent person has gone against the police.

 

It does not have to be in the constitution to be correct or true.

It is in fact quite logical, without the second the rest disappear.

It is no coincidence that the Disinformation governance board has been unpaused during all the controversy over recent shootings.

 

We know darn well that if the citizens are disarmed that all other rights are subject to the whim of government and the persons in power at the time. We distrust the secular progressive left American elites in this country enough that we will never ever let them rule over us with us stripped of that crucial protection against them, by them.

 

If you think guns will prevent the government from anything then you are probably a Republican. The only thing it stops is cops from protecting children apparently

 

It is a precaution against the future that the founding fathers mention explicitly and placed there against a future contingency. It hasn’t happened yet. As long as we are all armed it won’t happen.

 

Strange they didn’t mention that — anywhere — ever
I notice you bypassed the other post

 

Daniel Shays Rebellion
Whiskey Rebellion
Frys Rebellion
German Coast Uprising
Turner's Rebellion
The Antirent War
The 1842 Slave Revolt
John Brown at Harper's Ferry

Just to name a few.

 

You are unfamiliar with history.

 

You're kidding right?

John Brown's people got their asses kicked by federal troops just off hand.

The Whiskey Rebellion was likewise manhandled by the feds and only George Washingtons mercy kept them out of prison.

 

Oh now it has to be a successful attempt?

Goal post moving.

 

Perhaps, I never claimed to be all knowing, I leave that up to the conservatives here.

When did an armed civilian group activity defend against the strongest military known to man on their own lands to preserve their freedoms.

 

The vietnamese are republicans?

 

The Battle of Athens.