Except when it comes to these military superpowers wiping a well armed citizenry out in 5 minutes, right?
You speak a lot of sh!t, and you say multiple conflicting things in subsequent postings, even denying what you previously said. What is "underage children"? Under what age, and for what purpose? Are they ok in murdering another because they are under some mythical age then? Why then would you defend the murder of an innocent 73 year old man? You can backtrack now, but it's in clear black and white.
Pretty sure it isn't what the victim wanted. What if the court doesn't convict them? Would that be the result you wanted? They beat him to death. With a gun he may still be living. We see what happened when he didn't have a gun.
it is a pipe dream They all mutilate flag we are here to debate but please respond in small answers ! if you move your hand, I'll pat your back too. How about this spearheaded by à right wing mentally challenged bloke who was replaced by a mentally incompetent career politician who is racists I would prefer to not vote for either As a libertarian I reject stop and frisk LMFAO! Read the Laws
"When the people fear the government, that is called tyranny. When the government fear the people, that is called liberty" - Unknown
Son (I say "son" because I have met 14 year old men and now, 73 year old children)...I value life more than you will ever understand. I spent decades of my life risking my own to defend the likes of yours. I also defend law and order. It is not to save the television set I would shoot an intruder, but to stop lawlessness, something you seem to have no clue about. All your analysis is about money... dollars... Mine in about law and order, stopping criminals you would gladly let run free to steal, maim, murder and rape. For you to say that I want to "kill a thief" is a miserable, rotten, awful thing to say. You love criminals. You love thieves. You love rapists. You love disorder, chaos and confusion. You want to be a victim. I don't.
What you mean is anarchy followed by tyranny. What you are really defending is mob rule. And mob rule leads to the worst tyranny of all - rule by thugs and scum. Eventually they are all killed off but it paints an ugly future.
Faucci is a Democrat. He has failed Americans. That and it helps that China created it, and China is Communists, and Democrat Politicians are wanna be Communists.
If huge Definition sites are ran by liberal Democrats, what chance do most Republicans actually have of changing a definition of those words? It's part of their Agenda, and they aint ganna change that for nobody. lol duh?
So wait! Anarchy is a bad thing? Maybe you should look up what socialism and communism is. They include Anarchy and marxism. The opposite of what you're talking about laws. I'm for laws, but Anarchy doesn't fit into them that well. And Socialism goes quite well with Anarchy. That is what Democrat Politicians want.
Please point where I said "anarchy"? It sorted out the French aristocracy back in the day of the French Revolution, did it not? They've been doing ok since, except for the Global Youth Leader graduate puppet, Macron. Ah, you've learnt something new. Good for you. I also provided a link for GYL.
It's common sense, to a lot of us, that the majority of the Military and Police in America vote for Republicans for a reason. Unfortunately, Democrat voters can't comprehend this, or don't even try to. They don't know why. All they hear and see, is what the Democrat fake news media tell them too, see and believe, and their Democrat Politicians Lords tell them, that they're always the victim. Democrat Politicians wish to destroy the Police and the Military, partially, because they are a group of people in America, that still represent great honor, for the most part, and we can't have that, now can we? things like being Patriotic, and honor, and Pride in ones Country, and happy to have so many freedoms.
A majority of these people, on various campuses are too afraid to answer what a woman is. That's how confused they've become.
Wiki is owned by à foundation. Not one person. Jimmy Donal Wales, the originator, is described as an objectivist, closest to the centre right. Look him up ...
it depends on what your definition of a woman is? or what your ******* definitions are in general? u know, the politically correct ones are?
For heavens saké is there anything used by the general public that you suspect is not tainted by the left? Can you not see the conspiracy theory you are seemingly obliged to drown in? It is paranoid to think that everything is against your interests? Can you not see that this cynicism in the spur to the deep chasms in your culture which will eventually harm the unity and strength of your country. If you aren't careful the possibility of à real civil war arises.
You don't know what would have happened if he had. You cannot prove something that never happened. I repeat. The matter is being dealt with by the law. Not by someone with a gun pretending to be the law.
