Eric Trump reveals HE told Donald FBI raided Mar-a-Lago: Ex-President's son claims agents 'ransacked

Link.

 

Already linked it. But you can see with your own eyes in the CSPAN video.

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4924264/user-clip-joe-bidens-sexual-assault-rep-steve-daines-niece

You can see her angle her body away from his hand as it approached her breast and then she even tries to knock his hand back after he's pinched her.

And then she looks distressed as she realizes she can't go anywhere.

You are being purposfully ignorant because this is inconvienant for you to deal with right now. I get it. It's ok. We both know so we can move on now. You solved the mean tweet issue for about 4 years. It cost us our economy, empowering the Taliban...an energy crisis and embolden our enemies into getting more aggressive, but it was worth the cost.

 

1. The Act seems to be aimed at preserving the official records. Did the records that were in Trump's possession include all copies and the originals?
2. What are the penalties for violation of the Act by a former President?

 

Except in that instance that was the subject referring to the object. Any office-holder can be loyal to the President or Presidency without being personally in the pocket for them. With Trump's perspective, everything's top down and loyalty means fealty or go.

I personally do think Holder made a number of procedural mistakes and took some questionable decisions while he held office as AG.

Now why don't you admit something (substantive) that Trump did wrong during or after his time as President?

 

Obviously not, as they reportedly took 12 boxes during the search. And, btw, there were reportedly 30 agents.

Apparently you counted them more than trice, like Trump at his inauguration.

 

Skip the ad hominem deflection and provide a source -- if you have one.

 

So, you gave an example supporting my claim, thanks. Here's bush's agreement after a lawsuit from the archives.
https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/news/20091214/index.htm

The bottom line this better be bigger than archives, based on the kid gloves used in the example above. FBI raid over archives, the world is laughing.

 

So, you read the warrant!? Great! Tell us more about it.

 

Nobody is above the law.

Trump left the WH with classified documents.

That was illegal.

The FBI went to seize them.

End of story.

 

So you were concerned the Obama admin knew they were spying and unmasking the Trump campaign. I'm shocked.

 

LOL brought to you by the honest abe.

 

Nice "feels" but notice I used the qualifier "from a policy perspective".

We're both Californian's, can you name a few examples of our state policy that are to the left of Canada?

Do we have universal healthcare?

Is it almost impossible to even buy a hand gun in CA?

It's easy to blame everything on a so called mythical "radical left" as Trump and his ilk often do but there's very little political influence from the "radical left" anywhere in US policy. It's just a marketing ploy.

 

I have pressed them. I email my representative and senators a couple times a month.

 

so you have already put him on trial and determined in a court of law that this property is stolen goods? Please link me to the case and court ruling

 

No it isn't. Search warrants don't display that information. They should, but they don't.

 

Was that the DOJ? pretty sure that was the CIA.

Oh I know, you don't see the difference.

 

As it is in any usual procedure. Does an ex-POTUS need another procedure?

 

How does the National Archives know Trump possesses highly classified material?

 

We have no idea what was included on the warrant. All we know is that Trump doesn't want us to see it.

The only person who has information that can be released to the public is Trump. He is choosing to withhold that information. Why?

 

What difference does it make?

 

No, they shouldn't ....give hints to potential criminals.

 

How do you, or anyone else know he possesses classified material?

 

Trump did something that was wrong. If any of us were to do what he did, we'd be put in jail. Wouldn't we?

 

Good question. Perhaps the FBI mole is telling them where he planted the evidence.

 

It proves that law enforcement isn't lying to secure the warrant.