Don't want to shatter your fragile mindsets....

Did you know that before 9/11 the department of counterterrorism test flighted Boeing passenger planes with remote flying and no pilot?

Did you know that before 9/11 the department of counterterrorism had an office in World Trade Center Building #7 on the 23rd floor where they spent many millions only on that floor reinforcing that floors walls, windows, etc making it literally a treefort or some type of sky bunker within the World Trade Center complexes?

I could go on and on with specific and verifiable facts that show you a picture of what was more likely what really happened on 9/11 but I wouldn't want to shatter your fragile mindsets....

 

Cite your sources, please.

Try to make your point without hurling insults - thanks.

 

These are quite basic facts with easy to verify sources....you clearly must like to ignore even the most basic facts to help build a shield of denial and protect your fragile beliefs on how everything works around you....

 

Cite the sources for your claims.
You can drop the insults, they are useless.

Just cite your sources. You know ... show evidence.

For starters:

Address the fact the OEM was EMPTY according to credible witnesses.

Address the fact an entirely new remote control operating system would have to be created for two different aircraft, installed without the knowledge of the airlines, and not discovered by pilots and mechanics intimately familiar with the aircraft.

Address the fact that the OEM office was manned 24x7 by CITY employees, not federal employees, thus making the setup of new equipment highly suspicious.

 

Of course, this has all been gone over earlier this year in this thread.

You never answered the basic inquiries then, will this time be different, or is it just more spam?

 

These pro-official version people have seen all the evidence.
http://able2know.org/topic/177268-1#post-4782975

They just keep playing dumb...
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1222
(excerpt)
--------------------------------------------------
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
--------------------------------------------------

...and trying to bury the evidence deep in the thread to reduce the number of people who see it because they know that, once people have seen it, there's really nothing they can do to make them think that 9/11 wasn't an inside job as the proof is simply too clear.

There will always be a certain number of people who experience cognitive dissonance...
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/dissonance.htm

...and go into denial. They won't be able to sway any objective thinking people though.

 

DARPA are running contests for driverless cars! Oh noes!

 

No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered


this is funnyperhaps scott can tell e what his 'logical' argument is

 

Hannibal asked some very specific questions, which were . . .

Perhaps you should discuss them instead of pasting in your silly talking points.

 

Witnesses can lie and I don't see what you're point is.

Who knows what kind of classified technology they had. Are you saying it was impossible to build remote-control aircraft?

Watch this at the 44:00 time mark
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wkyEDIxTk"]9/11 - Painful Deceptions - (Full Length). - YouTube[/ame]

The theory is that the planes landed at military bases and empty planes hit the towers.

Anyone can be part of a conspiracy, whether they're civilians, or military people.

You have the attitude that you've posted something substantial. There are plausible explanations for all of it and doesn't make the clear evidence of an inside job go away.

The craft that hit the Pentagon was too small to be a 757.
http://www.bcrevolution.ca/911_part_iii.htm

Your position is very weak and what you post doesn't make the clearest evidence of an inside job go away. You don't even seem to know the what the truthers arguments are. Your attitude does not fit the situation at all.

 

the frames aren't 'missing' in the video.....<eyeroll> the camera takes one frame every two seconds,enough to monitor traffic getting their tickets from the dispenser

 

Don't want to shatter your fragile mindset, but evertime one of these rumors gets posted and spread, it does direct and irreparable harm to your country.

Traitorous scum and enemy sympathizers.

 

How so?

I haven't seen any posts showing sympathy for your "enemy".

Care to elaborate?

 

If you have the proof, go to court? For the 1,000th time. Explain the light poles.

 

And everytime you post this stupid claim about damage to your country and treason, you get shot down. You even made a thread about it.

Here's a reminder about the last time you were asked to specify the damage/harm that was done to your country, which you didn't have an answer for.

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...most-treasonous-people-america-heres-why.html

 

Someday they will have to tell their children that they sided with mass murderers who killed 3,000 citizens. I personally don't know how they live with themselves.

 

For the 10,000th time...explain Flight 93's underground proof.

 

At least I won't have to tell my kids I was paid disinfo agent that went around multiple forums on the internet only posting on one topic on every single forum. The 9/11 forums spreading disinfo and attacking truthers.

 

We went through this on another thread a while back.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182662-video-message-non-truthers-3.html#post3782222
(see posts #24 and #25)

Now you're talking as if we'd never discussed this before. That's a classic tactic of a disinfo agent. Go ahead and read the info I posted on the light poles again.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=9632

 

Where has anyone tried to stop questions from being asked?

 

Where have you not? Every 9/11 thread that pops up, you two waltz in like clockwork, and start with your twoofer insults. You yourself, in your twenty page history of the posts you have made on this website over 90% on them are in the 9/11 forum. I don't know about you on other sites, but Candycorn like I said does nothing but post on the 9/11 forums bashing truthers and spreading disinfo. There are other topics you two can talk about you just don't. You both have one goal and that is to bash truthers and spread the official story anywhere you can. You do nothing else of any value on here at all. You both attack one part of the forum and one group of people relentlessly on this site. That is what shills are paid to do and Candycorn like I said is registered under the same pseudonym on multiple sites and only comments on one topic on all those sites too. So you two either have some type of passion for bashing truthers everyday all day long or you are getting paid to do it. I hope your getting paid because if you aren't, it's just sad that you two have that much time on your hands.

 

Can you point to one example of a question that has not been asked because someone stopped it?

 

Here we go with semantics. I phrased that wrong. I recant that statement. You cannot stop us from expressing our opinion. Yet at least. But what you do is come in here call everyone who asks a question a twoofer, insult our intelligence, and discourage any type of debate and any answers outside of the official story being found. Every thing is dismissed, any source used is dismissed as being unreliable all the while you two thump the official 9/11 report findings. The very same people we are saying we think may have lied to us, you use as your source for why we are wrong. Then we argue back, the insults start coming, and you rinse and repeat. Stopping questions from being asked was too strong and like I said I recant that. Stifle questions would be a better phrasing.

 

Link to where I've called anyone a 'Twoofer'. If you're going to make these claims, I'm going to ask you to support them. Semantics aside, you're claiming I've done something I don't believe I have.

Do you consider asking someone to support their argument with evidence is 'Stifling questions'?

 

That is 100% false. Go to USMB and see what I've posted.

[/QUOTE]

Every single 9/11 Board I have been on I have asked one question to you and other twoofers; tell us what you think happened. Few do. Those that have done so come up with the most bizarre scenarios that do not pass even the most token of analysis.

As for getting paid to do so; let me ask you this....

If I were getting paid by someone who wanted to keep you guys down, wouldn't it be in my payee's best interest to present as large a group as possible on the boards to make you feel (if possible) even more isolated, lonely, and rejected by the world?

Why then would they allow me to use my trademark Candycorn handle for years and years? Or Hannibals? Or all of the other guys who think your theories are nuts?

Oh Dear (in Marvin the Martian voice), there I go bashing a twoofer again.