What should be done with Abortion Doctors?

ill go with a good spanking but only if that’s what there into and want and you feel like giving them one

 

Seeing as the Medical Community can't actually decide what the term "Late-term" means, it is a moot point. Is it 17 weeks? 24 weeks? when? When there are three papers on LTA in the Journal of the AMA and they all use different time periods, then the term is invalid. Letter of the law says that abortions should not be performed when the Fetus is "Viable" or in otherwords "it can live outside thr womb on its own". The fact is: Nothing can be done because abortions are legal.

 

Meh! Could have easily been vaso-vagal events (fainting for those who do not know)

And is still just conjecture - clinics like this basically have to call an ambulance if someone stubs a toe on the doorstep - would explain the laughing

 

And if what you are "defending" is a non-viable sport that will never survive??

 

Let's hear what former abortion doctors, who have since renounced their murderous practices, have to say:

"The picture of the baby on the ultrasound bothered me more than anything else. The staff couldn't take it. Women who were having abortions were never allowed to see the ultrasound."
—Joseph Randall, M.D.

"My heart got callous against the fact that I was a murderer, but that baby lying in a cold bowl educated me to what abortion really was."
—David Brewer, M.D

"I am a murderer. I have taken the lives of innocent babies and I have ripped them from their mother's wombs with a powerful vacuum machine."
—McArthur Hill, M.D.

"I want the general public to know that the doctors know that this is a person, this is a baby. That this is not some kind of blob of tissue . . ."
—Anthony Levatino, M.D.

Even unapologetic abortion doctors know it is a baby:

"Am I killing? Yes, I am. I know that..."
—Curtis Boyd, M.D.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfWB7tcAdhw

 

And those people absolutely know this is an abortion and not a D&C for partial miscarriage?

 

[video=youtube;us_y9GP_-DA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us_y9GP_-DA[/video]

 

so we need a way to kill the fetus 1st to avoid animal cruelty?

 

This type of abortion is rare. When abortion is necessary in late-term, the choices are the D&E abortion he described, the D&X abortion that is now illegal thanks to the propagandists (it was also rarely done), and hysterotomy which is more dangerous for the woman and her future fertility.

 

Didn't you try to scold me in another forum when I described 19-weeks as "late-term" ? You obviously do not think 19-weeks (when it is indeed a baby) is "late-term".
The priest in the video is talking about abortions in the second trimester.

 

They're also rare in 2nd trimester. Only 10% of abortions are done after the first trimester. Just get over it, SOME ABORTIONS ARE MEDICALLY NECESSARY. But some of you would rather see the woman die than be allowed to abort.

 

I went with option 3..... but i would change it a bit to something more like this

 

So by that SAME STANDARD....a women who self-induces with RU-486, you'd want executed?


((Please don't disappoint my expectations...with a direct, honest answer. ))

 

yes, obviously

 

Odd the "pro-lifers" never mention their desire to see women executed who use RU-486?!?!?!?!?

 

lol.... im not "pro-life". I'm pro justice. if you are innocent and do no wrong, you deserve not to be punished. if you commit evil acts against others you deserve to pay for your crimes.

Thats what I base my whole life around. Thats how I formed my political beliefs, and thats how I act in every day to day life.... - Justice

 

That's just a misdirection choicers are fond of using. I don't have any objection to abortions that are truely medically necessary— but then again, what exactly does "medically necessary" mean? It means something very different to an abortion clinic than it does to a pro-lifer. More often than not it is just used as an excuse to do the abortion. It is actually quite rare that an abortion is ever really medically necessary.

I have already shown in another thread that even most late-term abortions are not done for "medical reasons", much less abortions in the second trimester.
http://www.politicalforum.com/abortion/266663-late-term-abortions-real-reasons-they-performed.html

If they are really so "rare", like you claim (which they are not), then you wouldn't have any problem banning second trimester abortions in these cases, would you?
But you do have a problem with that, because you support abortions on healthy second-trimester babies, even when an abortion would increase the medical risk to the mother!

 

so what makes a fetus a person?

 

You have not shown that. Only 10% of all abortions are done after the first trimester. Some second trimester abortions are done for elective reasons, but they are few. Women don't choose to have late-term abortions.

Second trimester fetuses don't have the capacity to think, which is what makes humans different from other animals. WHEN would an abortion increase the medical risk to the pregnant woman? WHEN and under what circumstances?

 

that's a pretty dumb question. what doesnt make a fetus a person? because they arent as fully developed as they are at 20-28 weeks? might as well say a baby is not a person because they are less developed than an 18 year old.

 

not being smarter than are food animals might do the trick

 

Excellent! It is so obvious. . .to most reasonable mind!

 

Not being born makes it not a person.

That's the standard that all of humanity over all of human history has used. If your crank religious cult wants to change that standard, you'll need to do better than screaming "Because I say so!".

 

so extremely dumb people aren't real people then?

 

actually.... science is on my side. life starts at conception for 100% of people. undisputed scientific fact.