What if the President served a single term?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Daggdag, Jul 19, 2013.

  1. Daggdag

    Daggdag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    15,668
    Likes Received:
    1,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    One of the biggest problems in American politics is the fact that four years into their first term, a sitting President is so busy trying to get reelected that they lose sight of their duty.

    I think it would be more effective to have the president serve a single 8 year term, and then be done with it. One term for every president, and they can not run again. So, the President would then be able to focus on doing their job without needing to kiss ass and babies every four years.

    If a president is unpopular, a "vote of no confidence" could be implemented. If enough people, I would say around 10% to 15% of registered voters sign a petition, a type of recall election would be held, in which the people vote on whether or not to remove the president from power. Basically it would be an impeachment by the people. The Vice-President would finish out the term.
     
  2. undertheice

    undertheice Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,270
    Likes Received:
    1,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    how many of our recent vice-presidents would you have been comfortable giving presidential power to? quayle? gore? cheney? biden? there is a reason these men played second fiddle.
     
  3. Daggdag

    Daggdag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    15,668
    Likes Received:
    1,957
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, Clinton was popular enough that he would have been fine. Cheney, quite frankly would have been better than Bush, and again Obama would not be removed from office. He would have enough support to get a simple majority in a recall election.

    And, if need be, we could make it so both Potus and Vice Potus are removed and the Speaker of the House takes over, or even that a full election is held and a new president is elected immediately after the former is removed.
     
  4. Idealistic Smecher

    Idealistic Smecher Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2013
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why would Cheney had been better?
     
  5. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Probably because he wasn't or isn't a leftist wuss, and the fact that he's the greatest VEEP in our nation's history.
     
  6. Idealistic Smecher

    Idealistic Smecher Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2013
    Messages:
    472
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wasn't a leftist?

    Had you seen the expansion of government under Bush?
     
  7. Troianii

    Troianii Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    13,464
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
     
  8. Curmudgeon

    Curmudgeon New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    3,517
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That would make the President a lame duck from day 1. I think that a system like you suggest would create a very unstable government. Most nations with one term presidencies, the President has no real power and the executive authority is in the hands of the leader of the lower legislative house,
     
  9. AuntiE

    AuntiE New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Actually, the Commonwealth of Virginia has one six year term for the governor. It seems to have worked effectively enough.
     

Share This Page