Obama Administration's War Against The Second Amendment...Continued...

Like I said, nothing with the 2nd.

 

Are you being disingenuous on purpose?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

 

I want you to explain to me how the 2nd Amendment contributes to a war on crime.

 

Well, if you had been paying attention, you would know that a well regulated militia would obviate the need for a War on Crime; especially if cities were to muster their city militias as often as required.

 

That's why the 2nd Amendment needs to be fully unleashed. Once again, allowing individuals to exercise their rights, would arm many law-abiding citizens that can do their part in protecting themselves, their loved ones and their property.

 

That power is available already. It doesn't really require the Second Amendment, unless a city were to try to disarm a well regulated militia.

It just seems like our elected representatives have no real solutions as a form of "job security".

 

How many guns has Obama confiscated?


ZERO.

 

Give him a chance, will you?

 

I won't.

 

Yes, the hate filled right wingers all said from Day One that Obama was going to confiscate your weapons ad to this date he hasn't taken so much as one gun unlike Republican Bush.

All these lies, all this hate, all this deranged right wing propaganda from the delusionals of the far right and yet not one word of it has been proven to be true.



WHY DO THESE RIGHT WING PROPAGANDISTS HATE AMERICA SO MUCH????

 

"Not one word", you say.....
What of the stand-off in Conn. that we haven't heard the resolution of yet? Remember? 300,000 AR owners who refused to comply with the confiscatory law?
What of his (Husseins') parading the kiddies, trying to get stricter gun laws? The examples go on and on and on. It is perfectly clear that this clown wants to disarm America. Do you think we're as stupid as the *******s who insist that America means anything at all to this jerk?
Whose side are you on?

 

You made my point for me,.........hiding behind slogans.

As I recall, I was addressing how you falsely denied talking about "means" when you had clearly talked about "preemptive strikes".

 

Delusional, I'm afraid. The so-called "stand-off" as you called it concerned a STATE law that Obama had nothing to do with. Please have some self respecting veracity on this.

The rest of your post is nothing but ad hominem personal attacks that you should no better than to use.

 

I assume you were referring to my post, though you can't find a way to quote or spell. Would you try to tell me that it was the Tea Party who passed the laws in Conn.? It's all a team effort, you silly boy.
There is a conflict brewing in this country, and we will see how it goes for those places that have driven the Free People away.
BTW- It's neither guns nor bullets that kill people. People kill people.

 

Obama hasn't taken away any guns yet because, thankfully, the opposition to his agenda, is much greater.

 

Exactly....what he has done is irrelevant to what he would do given a chance, Fortunately he was opposed by a bi-partisan effort or there would now be a ban on all "SCARY LOOKING WEAPONS". Some people just can't stand for anyone to criticize the messiah!

 

Don't believe in playing nice, eh?

By this response you imply a conspiracy between the executive branch and the CT legislature AND the CT Governor. An interesting, if not totally delusional stance, friend. I assume you have proof? No?

More dribble, I'm afraid. You really should try harder to inform yourself, friend. Are you REALLY saying that the only "free people" are those who own assault weapons? Idiocy, really.

Oh? The bullets have nothing to do with it? My bad.

 

The do nothing Republicans in Congress have succeeded in stifling progress. Yet, somehow everybody from the delusional far right blames Obama who never tried to take away anyone's weapons unlike Bush in New Orleans.

 

LOL the stifling happened in the senate controlled by the delusional left at the beckoning of the even more delusional liberal president Bammy with bi-partisan support I might add. Imagine the fun that we might have had on the right had Harry allowed Dianne to introduce her ban and it go down in defeat with democrat support, that woulda been a hoot eh? Most of all the stifling is the result of ole Harry. Check and Mate!

 

Amount of guns taken away by traitor Bush = too many to count



Amount of guns taken away by Obama = ZERO

 

Funny how you didn't mention that almost every Bill submitted by Senator Reid was filibustered by the Right wing? The amount of filibusters has more than doubled since McConnell has become the Minority leader.
http://www.brookings.edu/about/history

I guess it's just easier for you to call our President and Majority Leader Reid names, though. ............Check...Mate.....and YAHTZEE!

 

Funny how you didn't mention that Harry only introduced bills he knew had liberal support and were so controversial that the republicans had no choice...specially since he wouldn't allow any amendments, not even by his side. Check and mate and Yahtzee and BINGO!

I don't call people names whom respect the constitution....that should help bunches eh?

 

Yes, actually that helps a lot. I can now see how far you're willing to subvert the truth to accept what the Republicans are doing in Congress. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

And quite often these same "good men" with a gun are very dangerous to themselves and others. I guess things aren't quite as black and white as you might like, but that IS the danger of basing an argument on the slogan fallacy as you seem willing to do.

 

and at what point does Law become the latest tyrant?

 

of course this is YOUR interpretation to bad SCOTUS doesn't agree with you.
The Bill of Rights is a fundamental concept. These are to be excluded for Laws that would reduce them or eradicate them. The 2ndA backs it all up