GAY PRIDE BURGER coming to a town near you???

Nope.

Thinking that someone is lesser than you for being different in some manner which they cannot change and has no impact on you whatsoever such as race or sexual orientation?

That, my friend, is bigotry.

- - - Updated - - -

Shouldn't the world kind of already have gone to hell in a breadbasket, considering that homosexuality has been around for as long as humanity?

 

Look around, the view from the handbasket.

 

*looks around* I see a world where people are more highly educated, more polite, more informed about the world, fewer people go hungry, more is known about the universe and crime is lower than has ever been the case.

If these are bad things in your opinion, then I guess you can blame them on homosexuality.

I suppose what they say is true; things keep getting better, and people keep thinking things are getting worse.

 

no one cares how people have sex, or if they even have sex for that matter, this is purely gender based discrimination

"same sex" as in "same gender", not as in everyone has sex the same way


.

 

badger can is another form of coercion. When you get into someone's face and scream at them, you often find yourself on the ground with a busted nose. That's badgering and in some states that is considered to be fighting words, which covers self-defense.
Badger:
badger verb abuse, afflict, aggravate, aggrieve, annoy, annoy excessively, assail, bait, beset, bother, bully, chafe, discommode, discompose, disconcert, disquiet, distress, disturb, disturb keenly, exasperate, excruciate, fret, goad, grate, harass, harrow, harry, heckle, hector, hound, incommode, irk, irritate, mortify, nettle, oppress, perplex, persecute, perturb, pester, pique, plague, provoke, rile, roil, ruffle, taunt, tease, torment, torture, trouble, try one's patience, vex, worry
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/badgering

and I don't have to love my neighbor because he's gay.........I don't even have to respect him, or acknowledge his existence.
But I would not be so bold as to badger him..............
I do believe you said "badger your friends," with a bit of arrogance behind those words, IMO

 

It's a shame, but the left has forced a world upon us where homosexuality is considered normal and natural. They have fostered a notion that maintaining any type of traditional moral standards is now considered immoral. Today, the only thing wrong is the ability to identify right from wrong. Traditional societal norms are now wrong.

 

No treating people like crap because you don't like them has always been wrong.

Just more people have come to realize it and aren't taking the crap anymore.

 

Homosexual perversion is a symptom of societal decline not a direct cause of it.

 

so, who was wrong in WWII? The Nazi's or the Jews>>>then the Allied forces and the Nazi's?
what crap? Are we talking about forcing another's personal lifestyle on another is the right thing to do? Then you should have no problem with gun owners because they are not forcing anything on anyone, right?

 

Then please enlighten us on how our society is declining. Every available societal metric says that NOW is "the good old days". Crime rates are at all time lows. Murder rates are at all time lows. So are high school dropout rates and teenage pregnancy rates. STD infections are at all time lows. How, under those indisputable facts can you claim our society is "in decline"? Just because we don't treat homosexuals like (*)(*)(*)(*) anymore?

PS... As long as everyone involved is a consenting adult, there is no such thing as "perversion".

 

Really?

Children are flipping out and gunning down scores of fellow students and teachers and that looks like progress to you?

 

Try checking actual facts and not your meaningless emotional reaction to bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It is 2014. You have access to more information than has ever been the case in the history of humanity. That's a good thing, but it comes with a downside. That downside is that you hear about things in almost real time that 20 years ago you would never have known about, so that creates the illusion that things like crime are getting worse, but it's not.

But don't take my word for it, take a trip on over to the FBI's website. The raw data is available there for anyone to see. And it's free. You are wrong about pretty much everything.

 

Sorry, but Merriam -Webster disagrees with you, and backs Mac.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

Mentions nothing about this magical power of consent making any difference.

 

let's take a quick look at necrophilia.....one says yes, the other remains quiet, so it must not qualify as perversion
Libs really love redefining words to suit their argument.........jes sayin'

 

I couldn't possibly care less. I don't give two (*)(*)(*)(*)s what the dictionary has to say, when it comes to sexual behavior, so long as every person involved is a consenting adult, there is nothing that is inappropriate. "Normal" married sex, threesomes, boy on boy, girl on girl, orgies, anything you can imagine or see on pornhub. It's all good.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, and let's compare a live person giving consent to a dead one incapable of it. That's too stupid for words.

 

then why waste your time replying?

 

All that being said however does not change the definition. Something CAN be a perversion, even if people willingly partake in it or enjoy it.

 

The question was ...is what two consenting adults do considered a perversion.

How does a dead person have the ability of consent.

 

Who are you to limit marriage to adults? You have no basis in the Constitution for gay marriage whatsoever and any justification you bastardize from the Constitutions never has an age limit in its wording so how can you pretend you can insert your own moral judgement on what a marriage should be while you chastise those who have a moral objection to gay marriage?

- - - Updated - - -

Perfect summary of this debate from the left.

 

What an odd question. Of course I think they are equal in value to myself. Sexual orientation can never be grounds to consider someone of lesser value.

Of course, acts of child molestation are reprehensible, but that's not even close to relevant to this issue.

- - - Updated - - -

Well, I'm guessing he considers other factors than the constitution as well. The constitution isn't the only determiner of everything in the universe, after all.

 

silence = acceptance
My point is that it is perverted (besides being illegal) to partake in necrophilia. but to the evil doer, it is mentally acceptable, just like sex with a child some find that acceptable.
Just because someone does something does not mean it is acceptable.
Gays only constitute 2% of the total population. What they do is not normal or else the percentage of gays would be more like 35%. That might be grounds for redefining what normal is.
One might look at the perverted sex between same-sex and call it normal, but I get this undeniable urge to throw up at the thought.
Now, that's a perfectly natural response to the notion of anal sex between two men

 

nobody cares about what you find perverted mac. that's the beauty of this country. if your perceived morals make you think something is perverted, you have the constitutional right NOT to do it. You do not however have the constitutional right to stop someone else from doing it.

 

just thought I'd point out that the majority of americans support same sex marriage now. so its no longer a perversion.

- - - Updated - - -

because an adult raping a child is the same as 2 consenting adults.

the stupidity in the arguments of the anti homosexual crowd is astonishing.

- - - Updated - - -

14th amendment tex. please for the love of god (*)(*)(*)(*)ing read any of the court decisions which have overturned the unconstitutional bans on same sex marriage. the constitutional justification is there for you to read.

 

Who said that besides yourself rahl?

Its called thinking things through in an argument not wildly proclaiming the Constitution supports you without evidence and without any mention of age of consent. That will continue to be your downfall.

The 14th amendment has no mention of age of consent or age requirement. You would know this if you actually read it.

Try again.

 

then why hasn't the definition been changed in the dictionaries?
I call crap on the notion.
I'd like to see the sources where the majority of people in the US support perverted activity?
A real poll, not one made up by the buggary boys