Belgium admits......"We've lost control of the Muslim radicals"!

Was I not replying to a Trump supporter wanting an army of 10,000,000 to annihilate the people of the ME and has not Trump promised to create the biggest army in the world for the US with better than imaginable weapons?

 

yeah but he would not occupy. He would go in kill grab valuables get out.

 

and you believe that would sort the situation out?

 

So apparently ALLAH didn't know right from wrong, because if he picked his #1 role model of all time, and didn't tell that role model to stop raping a child, then Allah didn't know right from wrong. Mohammad didn't know right from wrong - sure, he knew the local customs regarding raping children, but obviously didn't know right from wrong. He didn't care about the psychological damage to children that would occur by his role model status and his raping a child. Maybe a good role model for 7th century Arabia, but certainly not a good role model for 21st century civilized nations. Allah was so stupid that he didn't foresee a pedophile being his #1 role model for all time.....obviously Allah is not real.

PS Stop trying to run interference for pedophilia.

 

if it doesnt we do it over and over again till they understand.

 

What are you actually suggesting doing? Genocide? Given that the US led destruction of the ME is the strongest recruiter for terrorism already I am guessing you will have previously deported or killed all Muslims living in the West. Will you also be destroying Saudi Arabia. Just how big a kill are you after. Do you think that any American would be safe anywhere in the world when you are finished?

 

No, getting 72 hot virgins (and the boys who "are like pearls") to rape, and the rivers of wine - all that Mohammad promised his warriors who die for his invisible friend while trying to spread Sharia Law, THAT is the "strongest recruiter for terrorism." Jihadis get the highest place in Paradise, even.

 

If so, we got nothing.



​

 

Catherine the Great (a Christian) used to like sex with horses. I'm not sure that EVER happened in Islamia.

 

We need to stop (p)(u)(s)(s)(y)footing around with these murderers. Anyone, of any religion, who shows the slightest whiff of radicalization should be interned and kept until they have been thoroughly de-radicalized.

 

No one is now or ever has been '(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) footing'. Rather bit by bit we have seen rights and ways of being changed. We have seen ISIS winning in it's intention to destroy Western Liberal Democracy. For several years now Theresa May has arranged for people she is suspicious of to have their citizenship removed when they leave the country - this is up to people three generations citizens. After having removed their citizenship she arranges for their names to go over to an organisation the Guardian calls the Matrix where each Tuesday Obama decides whether they will be droned or taken away for torture and imprisonment overseas or some other outcome. More recently of course as you probably heard May arranged for us to drone all by ourselves people who were still UK citizens in Syria.

Apart from that we have the detaining without trial. Not sure how long that is. I know Dianne Abbot got that reduced somewhat as it clearly was only for Muslims.

And apart from that we have had the prevent strategy which has not allowed people to actually discuss these issues which I would have thought was one of the main ways of changing opinions particularly among the young. People have been arrested while at University due to doing research in connection with their course.

Despite for a year or two it being recognised that Islamic terrorism is just the same as any other terrorism - that is is motivated by politics not religion the Government still appears to have not really cottoned on to that in the way they approach things.

The Government did have one very successful component of it's Prevent Strategy and that was basically a counselling service where people believed to be at risk would go and talk with someone - a counsellor. This was apparently the most successful prevent strategy but was stopped due to the recession and 'lack of money'.

and so we get to the present day where University Lecturers are required to carefully monitor the words of their students and if they have any ideas which could possibly suggest a leaning towards terrorism to report them. The house of Lords did try to get this stopped due to it basically being censorship at University - a place where there is no place for PC and not only that probably one of the best places for ideas to be challenged and people to change their views.

In addition to that children as young as three are watched and their teacher is required to report them if they have any suspicion that they are in any way leaning towards becoming terrorists.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...m-strategy-schools-demonising-muslim-children

We already or England certainly, I am not sure if it is the same in Scotland are not treating our children as children are not teaching as teaching but rather have our Muslim children from the day they can understand it knowing they are being watched and had better be careful what they say.

You mention wanting this for people regardless of religion? How about those without religion. People did point out how no one had been watching the far right when Breivik came along and I do not think the situation is much changed by now though apparently a teenager got turned over for using his school computer to go to UKIP's site but I suspect this was lip service to try to pretend it was not just Muslims. One child apparent wrote that her father was a terrorist - that was her gone for thought modification even though it was a spelling mistake. (can't remember what it was supposed to be )

So it is all there already and I do not believe it is the best way to go.

 

No we have (*)(*)(*)(*)ty choices. Trump being the least (*)(*)(*)(*)ty of them.

 

yuuuuup.

 

I agree we have ****-ty choices. I'm not sure Trump is the least ****-ty of them. I think even a democrat might be a less ****-ty choice than putting Trump in the white house.



​

 

Getting back to the topic:

New reports reveal that Daesh, also known as IS/Islamic State has allegedly trained at least 400 fighters to target Europe in a series of terrorist attacks.

According to security officials speaking to the Associated Press, the Daesh terrorist group has a number of semiautonomous cells spread across Europe.

The warning comes from a number of European and Iraqi intelligence officials, as well as a French lawmaker familiar with jihadi networks.

Approximating at least 400 individuals, these fighters have been given orders to find the right time, place, and method to carry out their mission, according to officials.
​

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160323/1036859852/daesh-400-europe-attackers.html#ixzz43lVTPb7g



Russia has the best intelligence service in the world, and unlike others they actually gather intelligence rather than instigating regime changes and committing false flag attacks.

In February they gave facts and figures to the UN of where the terrorists were coming from, and what people were helping them get into Syria, and helping them get out of Syria ..but it was ignored by the very nations that are now under threat.

Russian intelligence services gave Belgian authorities information about the preparation of terrorist attack by three militants of the terrorist organization "Islamic state". This was reported by a source of TV channel LifeNews.

According to him, brothers Ivan and Alexey Dabbashi at the end of February went from Belarus to the territory of Belgium. They were accompanied by their compatriot Marat Yunusov.

27-year-old Alex Dovbish first converted to Islam and started hanging out with radicals. Under the influence of the older brother, 23-year-old Ivan also converted, said a source. According to intelligence information, brothers Dabbashi went to a terrorist camp in Syria, received military training, and went on to the territory of the European Union.​

http://www.fort-russ.com/2016/03/russian-intelligence-warned-belgium.html

 

I agree, bliar, Bush and Cameron should all get life sentances

 

Dang, the atheist are mad that they haven't been included, says Pot, Mao and Stalin....Carry on!

 

these religious fanatics have no issues including Atheists

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/24/l...igned-up-on-tea-party-page-and-quoted-hitler/

"And in another, Houser cheered Muslim extremists for defending their religion.

“Yes it’s true, Muslims are alone in shutting down liberals that mock their God. They have my complete Christian respect.”"

 

You really don't understand do you? Paedophilia is a modern concept and didn't exist in the Prophet's time, neither as a moral taboo nor as a component of law. In Catholic Europe children were being married every day. It was normal THEN! Do you get it now?
Anyone claiming Mohammed was a paedophile is displaying his own ignorance; either that or is just bright enough to understand but will use any infantile excuse to insult Muslims.

 

Yes, I get it now: BOTH religions' founders didn't know right from wrong enough to instruct them to not pork children. And here I thought that only ALLAH was too stupid to not instruct his followers to not rape kids, I guess it's also true that GOD/JESUS were too stupid, or too immoral, to not instruct their followers to not rape children. As per usual, when one thinks that Islam is bad, one needs to realize that the Bible's heroes were even worse.

PS "marrying" a child is just a religiously approved way of raping a child. Children are in no mental condition to decide who they will have sex with, much less who they will have sex with for the rest of their lives. All child "marriages" are basically forced or at least coerced - taking advantage of our most vulnerable members of society. But Moses, Mohammad, god, Jesus didn't understand this - but I wouldn't expect them to, because they were obviously not divine (duh!).

 

If you had a time machine, would you, like me, go back and scold Mohammad for doing what we now of course know is wrong (raping children), now that we are more advanced, know that rape hurts children in many many ways, and have risen to a higher moral standard? Would you, Snake? I would, and so would Richard Dawkins. How about you? Please tell us (you appear to be against rape of children, so I'm pretty sure you'd do this, but I just wanted to check for sure.) What say you?

 

Agreed - it's paedophilia by any other name.

 

Incredibly, their defense of pedophilia is "but he didn't KNOW he was a pedophile"!!
Well then he's too stupid to be the best and final prophet of god and the #1 role model of all time!! Let's raise our standards, folks, when it comes to who should be our #1 role model of all time.

 

That's not all they lost control of. What do you think they are up to?



Belgian nuclear guard shot and security access badge stolen: media......

Two days after bomb attacks at Brussels airport and on a packed metro killed 31 people and injured hundreds, a security guard who worked at a Belgian nuclear plant was murdered and his pass was stolen, Belgian media reported on Saturday.

The French language Derniere Heure (DH) newspaper reported the security guard's badge was de-activated as soon as it was discovered he had been shot dead in the Charleroi region of Belgium and his badge stolen.

A police spokeswoman said she could not comment because an investigation was ongoing.

The video, lasting several hours, showed footage of the entrance to a home in northern Belgium and the arrival and departure of the director of Belgium's nuclear research program.....snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/belgian-nuclear-guard-shot-security-access-badge-stolen-125249013.html

 

Yeah, let's all invoke magical thinking and head off in our time machines.

With Dawkins, even.

lol.