Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Emails

REPORT: Hillary’s Emails Hacked by Russia – Kremlin Deciding Whether to Release 20,000 Stolen Emails (VIDEO)​

Jim Hoft
May 10th, 2016


The Kremlin is debating whether to release the 20,000 emails they have hacked off of Hillary Clinton’s server.[http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2036.htm]

According to a report from four days ago, beginning in 2011, the Russians began monitoring Romanian computer hacker Marcel Lazăr Lehel (aka Guccifer) after he attempted, unsuccessfully, to break into the computer system of the Russian funded RT television network.

After monitoring Guccifer, the Russians were reportedly able to record (both physically and electronically) his actions which allowed the Russian intelligence analysts, in 2013, to not only detect his breaking into the private computer of Secretary Clinton, but also break in and copy all of its contents as well.

The report notes that shortly after Russia obtained Clinton’s emails, they released a limited amount to RT TV which were published in an article in March 2013, titled Hillary Clinton’s ‘hacked’ Benghazi emails: FULL RELEASE.[https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/]

​

~~~~~~​

​

Apparently no Western journalists promoted this story in 2013.

A couple of years later, in 2016, the US then brought in Guccifer for questioning related to this incident. According to the report, NBC news knew why Guccifer was being questioned but withheld this information from the American public.

The Associated Press reported in October 2015 that “Hillary Clinton’s private email server maintained in her home while serving as secretary of State was possibly hacked by Russia-tied authorities, and others, on five separate occasions.”[http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/hillary-clinton-emails-nearly-hacked-by-russia/]

The AP report noted that investigators discovered among Clinton’s cache of released emails malicious software aimed at transmitting data to three overseas computers, including at least one in Russia. This malicious software was reportedly activated by clicking on it; but in October it was not clear if Clinton actually opened these messages or not, per the AP.

Recently separate reports have come out noting that Guccifer had indeed hacked Clinton’s emails. Now according to this latest report, Clinton’s server was not only compromised by Guccifer but also by Russia. Guccifer told FOX News last week that he hacked Hillary’s homebrew server and so did at least 10 others.
[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...fer-breached-clinton-server-least-10-others/]

UPDATE: Judge Andrew Napolitano told Megyn Kelly on Monday,

“There’s a debate going on in the Kremlin between the Foreign Ministry and the Intelligence Services about whether they should release the 20,000 of Mrs. Clinton’s emails that they have hacked into.”

[video=youtube;oounggTI-jk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oounggTI-jk[/video]​

(Excerpt)

Read more:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...deciding-whether-release-20000-emails-hacked/



Both Bill and Hillary Clinton and President Obama have the top security clearances in the nation. You cannot tell me that Bill and Obama were unaware of a server in the Clinton's house and their responsibility to make sure it was government secured. Ask yourself, did Bill and Hillary ever exchanged emails over that server? Did President Obama ever receive an email from Hillary over that server? That is also in breach of national security. Do you think Bill and Obama checked for the Gov't security seal on those emails. (I would think the lengthy security briefing that they are all required to understand and sign to get those high security levels would have covered this basic requirement.
Let's petition Obama to put Hillary into Prolonged Detention for putting the security of America at risk. The NSA, as alleged by Snowden has record of every email/phone call ever made on the internet. Hillary's server connects to the internet. We don't have to worry about the deleted emails. The NSA has them in their supercomputer. Has the NSA turned over states evidence to these emails? I cannot imagine that the NSA would want to get tangled up in a cover up of this magnitude. Let's also petition the NSA to release the files to the FBI on Hillary's deleted server. Hillary as already told us that she is not a "techie" I don't think she is smart enough to wipe the NSA computer clean. I'm just wondering if Hillary, who has such a high security clearance has been compiling a file of dirt on most of the politicians, possibly the heads of the NSA, FBI and the CIA. If Hillary used her authority to look at the dirt on the people around her. (like the NSA has allegedly been doing) These are the same people that will ultimately make the decision to indict her or not. Could she use that incriminating information to blackmail them into looking the other way?
Oh.. I forgot.. the NSA is still denying that they have been collecting evidence against the US population. If they turn Hillary's file over, (including Hillary's deleted emails) they admit to Snowden's accusations. Interesting dilemma... There is a thing called, "Selective Enforcement of the Law" That is when the Authorities decide to apply the rules/laws to only certain people (they select who the law applies to) This is not legal. Everyone is equal under the Law and the Constitution of the United States of America. If the NSA doesn't turn over the alleged evidence/data in their supercomputer about Hillary, They cannot legally turn over collected data/evidence about any one else. That would be considered, "Selective Enforcement of the Law". This just keeps getting deeper and deeper everyday...! If Hillary walks, then why hold her subordinates feet to the fire. This is the corruption in Washington we all hate. ALL hate. She NEEDS to be an example, if anyone needed to be an example. Hillary is not presidential material in fact she is more apt to be elected by a jury of 12 to serve life in a federal prison.

 

If true, it comes down to a matter of who Russia trusts more, Clinton or Trump. If it's Clinton they will not release the emails. If it's Trump then I expect them to cough up the proof.

 

It sounds too good to be true.

I'm starting to question all the anti-Hillary stuff I've been seeing, though I despise her and support Trump.

I just can't believe that anyone is so far above the law. This would make Hillary the most protected politician in history, and I just don't buy it...

 

Amen. Or else there is no such thing as the rule of law.

 

You're forgetting the ability to blackmail Hillary/Obama. If this is true, then this is probably just a shot across Obama's bow letting him know that Putin can destroy his party's chances of staying in power, so either X, or the entire 20k cache will be put up on torrent sites around the world.

 

True-and all reasons why she was not supposed to even HAVE this secret, illegal server. If that hacker has the emails, and Russia does, its not to much of a leap to think even more countries/individuals do as well.

 

But didn't Obama assure us that he knew for a fact there was nothing in the emails that could hurt the US?

I mean he's never lied to us has he?

 

I wonder if Russia will use the Emails as leverage for other things. NATO, etc. And you're right, its all the reasons why she wasn't supposed to have the server. It's why the FBI will likely indict if something comes out of Russia. Russia has US by the balls, and also Hillary. Sad if it weren't true.

 

I think a lot of the anti-hillary stuff is making a mountain out of a molehill. Did she send classified intelligence over her server? Yes. Was it anything worth reading? Probably not. I had an hour to kill, so I decided to delve into the hillary emails that wikileaks has, and I came away with the image of a woman who only thinks in terms of public perception.

Her staff forward news articles that concern her, and if something is favorable, she orders it forwarded to other people (and printed up for bill who obviously doesn't use the internet). When damage control is needed, she thinks in terms of who can be blamed, or just volunteers Bill to handle things.

Honestly, I doubt she is even interested in reading classified information. All she cares about is reading nice newspaper articles about her, and bad things about republicans. None of her supporters can name anything she's done because she doesn't think in those terms. Accomplishing something means favorable public perception, and she doesn't care to hear about any negative things. I highly doubt she even knows her nickname is cankles.

 

That's what she seems like to me.

Exactly. She just strikes me as a classical female narcissist, and little else. I've met tons of them in my life, and it's hardly a cataclysm. She is a pure media creation with NOTHING in the form of real accomplishments. The equivalent of an ugly movie star, really. Remember, politics is Hollywood for ugly people lol.

 

It could come down to that, too.

 

I really think you underestimate the Clinton machine. Ruthless is the word that describes them.

 

I think you underestimate how criminal the Clinton machine really is. They will stop at nothing to win, and silence their enemy.

 

This belongs in the conspiracy section

 

lol too funny....

psst.... shes toast.....

 

Anybody notice that the leftists are shying away from responding.

 

Which also means that in all probability Obama's hands aren't totally clean.
Maybe he E-mailed Clinton with Benghazi tactics.Maybe he knew of Clinton's
private server and still E-mailed her about Libya strategy.
That totally changes everything.What are the chances that a POTUS would never
E-Mail his Secretary-of-State.Arguably THE most fluid and strategtic cabinet
official of all.

 

Which could explain why Clinton's new surrogate { Ex-Michigan Governor
and total Loon Jennifer Granholm } is out making the rounds talking about
Trump attacks on Hillary as Enabler.For Hillary and her history of enabling
Bills many and varied sexual dalliance.It's defelction from the more serious
stuff like Jail and being responsible for breaking national security.
Granholm using the word " Ridiculous " at least 3 times on Megyn Kelly.
When lefty surrogates use the word " ridiculous " ,you know guilt is right
around the corner.

 

They only need to release a few, and the should do that instead of talking about it.

 

Perhaps that is why Ambassador Stevens was murdered. Perhaps the terrorists knew that there was no security and that he had begged for her to do something because they had hacked into her computer. Obviously it wasn't so difficult.

 

They are all consulting their talking points on how to answer this. And they will all use the same language. I wonder where they get their talking points memo every day. "If a Republican says this, you say...if they come back at you, call them a racist. They are so utterly predictable, yet they are oblivious to the fact that everyone is on to them. I don't know whether to feel sorry for them or laugh. I think I will LAUGH!

 

That's the "clinton machine" which is, I'm sure, quite adept at such things. There are lots of beltway types that have pegged their careers to Hillary's career, and they'll do what is necessary to keep their cushy jobs that require little more than licking the brown off of hillary's gown.

Hillary herself isn't a machine. She's just an old woman of limited intellect.

 

You can't buy the fact the liberal media protects liberals? get real!

 

It would be funny if Americans didn't have to live amongst them.

I know every play in the lefty playbook before they do-I TELL THEM THIS-and they proceed to do everything I said-without a hint of insight.

I think of them like ewoks.

 

I'm new here. Why is spreading false information allowed here? Is this some sort of lib trick to make the Trump campaign look likes fools.

Pink stationary and Comic Sans font. Give me a break.