Australian TV host calls for an end to Muslim immigration

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2...alls-for-end-to-muslim-migration-to-australia

In fact, the only places in the world where there have not been recent terrorist attacks are places where there are few, if any, Muslims. Everyone knows this, but no one wants to admit it so they make up a name for and separate the Islamic fanatics from the rest of Muslims. There always has to be the disclaimer that 'not all Muslims are violent' when they talk about Muslims and their religion, but that doesn't change the fact that wherever there are Muslims, there is terrorism, and religious intolerance. No other religion in modern history has wreaked more havoc than Islam. The religion seems to breed violent fanatics. But of course telling this truth is called bigotry.

 

The left likes the way this group votes, so they will be willing to accept some terrorist attacks. A few thousand dead is worth advancing the left-wing agenda, to them.

 

Forcing US tax payers to subsidize the reproduction of tens of millions Hispanics and blacks, and forcing European tax payers to subsidize the reproduction of millions of Muslims is also worth it to them. The epitome of taxation without representation.

 

Whatever it takes to win, even if it means turning 1st world, advanced Western nations into extensions of the Hispanic 3rd world or the Arab 3rd world.

 

Don't know how it is in Australia but if that host were here in the U.S. she'd get (*)(*)(*)(*) canned inside of 2 days for that by the P.C. police.

 

That just demonstrates your geographic ignorance.

The only reason there has to be a disclaimer is because of people like you attributing the actions of a small number of people to 1.6 billion largely innocents spread all over the world (including the countless places you’ve never even heard of).

And your solution? Intolerance of all Muslims? Refuse them access, kick them all out, push them away, pretend they don’t exist? Or would you like to go further than pretending?

You sound more like the terrorists than most Muslims I know and I’d fear for my safety around you much more than I do around them. I’d definitely fear for their safety around you.

 

Let's point out why this statement is bull(*)(*)(*)(*):

1. Muslim immigration did not prevent the Orlando, San Bernandino or Fort Hood attacks, at least in America because those guys were born here.

2. "Muslim" and "terrorist attack" are not synonymous. Not to mention there are several places in the world suffering from terrorist attacks or civil wars or violence where there are Muslims. Learning geography might be a good idea before making statements like this.

3. Generally people who know better and aren't bigoted asshles don't group Islamic fanatics with all Muslims.

4. Again, wrong as hell on the "wherever there are Muslims there is terrorism." Do you remember any recent terrorist attacks in the United Arab Emirates? Or Oman? Tajikistan? Morocco? Maldives? Kosovo?

5. If Islam seems to breed violence then do you explain all these countries that don't have Islamic terrorism with a Muslim population there?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOze3LRuNw4

 

I'm surprised that they aren't sending them to the Concentration Camp on Christmas Island, Aussies are good for doing that.

 

Which is why there have been attacks in the last 1-4years and there are travel warnings for those wanting to vacation in those countries. But terrorism doesn't exist in those countries, right? Hell even China can't avoid terrorism from these fanatics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Marrakesh_bombing

http://getawaytips.azcentral.com/safe-travel-dubai-5155.html

https://www.safetravel.govt.nz/oman

http://www.dw.com/en/kosovo-police-arrest-man-suspected-of-planning-terrorist-attack/a-18153009

https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/maldives/terrorism

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/02/asia/china-xinjiang-uyghurs/

 

Nobody loves a traitor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8K06hkJqKI

 

Sorry - where is your proof

Australia has had "Muslim attacks" but they have been foiled. The Sydney siege was a disturbed individual who happened to be Muslim but we do have large Muslim communities

It has less to do with religion and more to do with social inequality

Indonesia with the largest Muslim population in the world, is hardly reeling from attacks

 

They weren't but their parents were immigrants. The second generation is at higher risk to commit terrorism than the first. Keep the first generation out, and we won't have to worry about the second.

McDonalds and heart attack are not synonomous, but there is a correlation.

Mere meaningless invective against a straw man. Such statements are just boring

Maybe Oman and UAE are safe for now, but the other countries on your list are not.

Terrorism in the Maldives:

Despite its reputation as an idyllic paradise popular among Western tourists, political and religious developments in the Maldives should be monitored closely. In the past decade, the Maldives has experienced an increase in religious conservatism, and this has coincided with a number of violent attacks on liberal activists and other citizens who have expressed outspoken support for moderate religious practices.[/quote]

https://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/the-threat-from-rising-extremism-in-the-maldives

Terrorism in Kosovo:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_Islamism_and_Islamic_terrorism_in_the_Balkans#Kosovo

Terrorism in Morocco:

http://www.ibtimes.com/morocco-breaks-isis-terror-cells-arrests-made-one-end-country-other-1855158

And last, but not least, Tajikistan:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Tajikistan

----------------------------------

Islam is undergoing a revival of historic importance. It is a global phenomenon advancing all over the globe, albeit unevenly, with some countries more deeply affected than other.

You can pretend it doesn't exist and the convulsions in the ME and Africa and South Asia are just random uncorrelated occurances, I suppose. But no where in the world will escape the renewal of Islamic madness.

 

And yet most of those places still see a good amount of tourists.

BTW regarding some countries like Oman, the U.S. State Department hasn't issued a warning. In fact none of the countries I mentioned do.

https://travel.state.gov/content/passports/en/alertswarnings.html

 

Don't think I've seen it mentioned but reporting is very different in other countries.

A bombing or shooting in the US involving multiple casualties is reported 99% of the time by the media. In some countries violence is so common it just blends in with their daily lives. You'll never hear it covered in the media.

 

Yes, the left loves Muslim immigration. It gets them votes and it erodes the influence of Christianity. Muslims allow them to kill two birds with one stone.

 

But she would still be right!!!!!

 

Simple: Leave the Arabs, in the Arabic World. If they can't co-exist with us, we shouldn't invite them. Likewise, as Westerners we could never fit in the Arabic World, so we'd never go to Arabia. If the two sides can acknowledge that they can't(and in our case won't) annihilate each other, they should at least mutually exist in neutrality.

 

Yet they do make the list in other countries. By the way, quite a long list from the sate dpt. Most of them have an Islamic terrorism problem.

 

My point being I'm more scared of people here already than foreigners. Of course if you can vet them properly then I'm on board with that.

*insert list of terrorism and countries here*

As I mentioned to someone else, those countries have no travel warnings issued by the U.S. as of right now.

- - - Updated - - -

To be fair, most of those locations are places the average person shouldn't be going anyway. I mean it's obvious right now that going to Turkey is a bad idea, and definitely Iraq.

- - - Updated - - -

So if the U.S. says it's safe but the UK says no, or vice versa, who do you listen to?

 

Actually I see no reason to go to those countries to begin with, especially as an Atheist. Why other people want to is beyond me.

If the US says yes and the UK says no or vice versa, I would listen to the US for the foundation of a list and the UK to add to that list of places not to go.

 

Don't ban individuals who live secular, ban people migrating from high risk countries.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nW0Jgyzv-I

 

Do not waste money or time on you tube as the truth rate is perceptibly lower than the worst advertising ever

 

What is a "high risk country" - war zone??? Yes very humanitarian - stop people from fleeing from slaughter