Wiki: Clinton team created fake craigslist job ad portraying Trump as a sexist

This fake ad, that I actually saw on Facebook, discredits every accusation the left can now or has thrown at Trump. This just goes to show you how low Clinton and her team will stoop. What did Mooch say again, when they take the low road we take the high road...is that what she said?

It will be interesting to see how liberals and the Clintonians defend this. Remember, I personally saw this ad on Facebook, so the approval to create this slanderous ad was given. This gives Trump a lawsuit.

Edit: Here's the link to the email https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

 

Honey bunch....LOL! What a diligent bunch of liars the Clinton campaign has. Not very subtle or effective, but diligent.

 

Lefties gonna lefty.

 

It is pretty funny that they thought they had to manufacture evidence to show the Orange Sex Predator for what he is, when there's so much real evidence lying around.

 

Quite a reach. I seem to see sex predators all around the Clinton camp. How about the head of Hillary's campaign's hubbie sexting with a 15 year old? On the positive side, she kicked him out of the house. On the negative side, that means he's totally guilty as hell. And are you really giving the Lolita express a pass, or did you conveniently 'forget'? It seems to me Bill was racking up quite a few frequent flier miles to Epstein's private pleasure island, with over 20 trips.

 

Call me cynical but I think the women accusing Trump are democrat shills. The media needs something to cover other than the constant and steady flow of documents showing Hillary and company to be corrupt and criminal.

Let's face it, Clintoncrats don't care about violence against women or they wouldn't be supporting Hillary. They just want to manufacture some out rage to try and make it plausible she won instead of stole it.

 

You dont believe all these women all are magically coming forward on their own a few weeks before the election on their own?

 

You are desperate enough to believe that the email is not someone having a joke! How many times are you going to embarrass yourself with all these emails. Hmm, the requirements?

* No gaining weight on the job (we’ll take some “before” pictures when you start to use later as evidence) * Must be open to public humiliation and open-press workouts if you do gain weight on the job * A willingness to evaluate other women’s hotness for the boss’ satisfaction is a plus * Should be proficient in lying about age if the boss thinks you’re too old Working mothers not preferred (the boss finds pumping breast milk disgusting, and worries they’re too focused on their children).

 

Yet another thread in a long list of RW propaganda bull(*)(*)(*)(*) lies about Clinton.

This supposed email first appeared in a Russian/Wikileaks dump before the Democratic convention. It was reported months ago by the NYPost and Snopes, among others.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/22/leaked-emails-show-how-democrats-screwed-sanders/
http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/25/what-we-know-so-far-about-wikileaks-dncleaks/

The supposed email was from one DNC staffer to other DNC staff.

It's not clear if this was a joke (the language certainly suggests it is) or what. There is no credible evidence that it ever ran.

But neither Clinton nor anyone on Clinton's team is copying on this email and there is no evidence that Clinton ever got it.

To state as fact that "Clinton and her team" created this email or had any knowledge or involvement with it, is another intellectually dishonest RW propaganda bull(*)(*)(*)(*) falsehood. And once again, many conservatives regurgitate these RW propaganda lies, and many conservatives just believe the RW propaganda with nary a critical thought in their brains.

Cons gonna be cons.

 

The email went from one DNC email address to another. There is nothing
"supposed" about it.

The OP source says he personally witnessed this ad on Craigslist. Are you saying he is a liar?

And there is no evidence to the contrary. I haven't heard the Clinton campaign deny or disavow this little stunt but perhaps they have been so busy finding women to attest that Donald Trump molested them, with absolutely zero corroborating evidence, that they just haven't had the time.
Thank God for Wikileaks, Without it we wouldn't know a fraction of the lies, stunts and crimes the Clinton campaign has been pulling off (like organizing hit teams to vandalize cars and homes displaying pro Trump signs).
Angry they've been found out? You should be.

 

Just out of curiosity, tell us where on Facebook you claim you saw this ad, when according to the email it was to be posted on Craiglist, hmmm?

 

Prove it was a actual email.

No, the OP source says that he personally witnessed this ad on Facebook, when the email says it is going to be posted in Craigslist.

How could he have seen it on Facebook when it was never posted there?

The OP source also claims that "Clinton and her team" and had knowledge of and involvement with it when there is no evidence that either Clinton or anyone on her team were copied with or ever saw this email.

The OP source intentionally making intellectually dishonest falsehoods promulgating RW propaganda is well documented. Here are three recent examples in just the last few days:

OP source intentionally and falsely insinuating Clinton wrote an email she did not and was not copied on or with:
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=479557&page=2&p=1066726911#post1066726911

OP source falsely claiming that "hot mic" showed CNN reporter telling people what to say:
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=478926&p=1066718210#post1066718210

OP source again intentionally falsely insinuating Clinton wrote an email she did not and was not copied on or with:
http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=478738&p=1066710323#post1066710323

Did I call the OP source a liar? No.

When someone is continuously, repeatedly, and intentionally intellectually dishonest by posting information he know is false or he has no idea of its truth, does that make him a liar?

I certainly have my opinion. Others can decide for themselves.

The email itself is only to DNC staffers. Neither Clinton nor anyone on her staff is on the email address lines. To assert that "Clinton and her team" created or had involvement or knowledge of this email is rank intellectual dishonesty.

You think it is great the Russians are manipulating American voters, eh? The only lies I'm seeing are the RW propaganda bull(*)(*)(*)(*) that is posted here daily.

 

Prove it was Russia.

 

It was a post from one of my lib friends and it contained a photo of the ad, it wasn't a paid ad. It happened about a month or two ago.

- - - Updated - - -

You seem to have a larger problem with thread titles than the corruption of a potential president and the people she surrounds herself with.

 

The Clinton campaign is also spending $5 million on Internet trolls.

 

I see you fall for the Clinton campaign propaganda hook line and sinker. Assange says it isn't the Russians. The FBI does not claim it's the Russians. Only Hillary does which is totally irresponsible for a possible leader.

 

LOL this is pretty funny. Thanks for sharing.

- - - Updated - - -

That is very impressive. I have never seen anybody coordinate such a hilarious attack throughout months on the internet. If she can rally trolls she is a great leader truly.

 

You can't even tell the difference between a satirical news website and a real news site, and we are supposed to take your word for it? Yeah OK whatever you say.

 

Don't take my word, take the word of the Clinton people who emailed each other about the ad they said they actually made. What does this say: "digital created a fake craigslist jobs post for women"

You guys keep trying to shoot the messenger but the message is still the same, Clinton and the people she hired are gutter dwelling slime balls.

 

Prove it wasn't. The email addresses and text within are all the "proof" I need and your claims to the contrary are absurd and baseless.

How are you so sure it was "never" posted there? Do you have an
encyclopedic automatic recall of every Facebook post ever made?

The DNC has been proven to have colluded with the Clinton campaign in many ways
in this election cycle (Debbie Wasserman Schultz vs. Bernie Sanders). I'd say the real stretch is to imagine that there is no communication between the two entities at all. And indeed, we have proof to the contrary.
Is it unlikely that two loose nuts in the DNC hatched this scheme without any input or approval at all? Yes. Is it unlikely to assume the DNC and Hillary Clinton
have not been working hand in glove all along? No.

Can you be more specific?

You've left little doubt that's what you believe.

And again, the DNC has been consistently colluding with the Clinton campaign all throughout this election. To insinuate that that it's implausible to think the Clinton campaign was a bystander here is just disingenuous, to say the least. The real intellectual dishonesty is in asserting there is no nexus between what the DNC does and the Hillary campaign.
There is no paper trail to point to but we already know how the two have worked closely together.

I don't think the Russians are manipulating anyone though it's convenient for the Hillary campaign to pretend otherwise.
Check the rock in your eye before you whine about the speck in someone else.

 

U.S. Says Russia Directed Hacks to Influence Elections
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/u...cuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html?_r=0

 

I'm not the one making the claim about the email and "Clinton and her team".

Because even the email says it was to be posted on Craiglist, not Facebook.

The OP author can prove his claim if he wants.

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting

Rank speculation is not truth.

About what?

Little reason to believe otherwise.

And again, your rank speculation is not truth.

Good for you. I'm not surprised. I couldn't care less.

What rock?

 

Oh really? Let's see the URL for the ad.

You seem to have a problem with the truth.

 

What Clinton people said that?

Or, speaking of gutter dwelling slime balls, are you once again intellectually dishonestly falsely asserting this email was from Clinton and he team?

- - - Updated - - -

In a statement from the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr., and the Department of Homeland Security, the government said the leaked emails that have appeared on a variety of websites “are intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/us-formally-accuses-russia-of-stealing-dnc-emails.html

Once again you've been duped and conned by RW propaganda.

 

NY Times quoting the Obama administration is your proof?