This election has been virtually devoid of any issues related to government. Rather, it is always deflected by the corporate propaganda media and press to personality issues. But also any time Trump goes too low in the polls, the MSM propaganda machinery will shift its focus to Hillary, causing Trump to rise in the polls - but still losing. I've been traveling and had a lot of time, so was reading the magazines and publications that are read by Wall Street firms, big banks, the mega corporations and the super rich. All make it VERY clear how they want the election to turn out. They see Trump as unpredictable and too independent the "market" always reacts negatively to the unknown. But they don't like Hillary because she means more regulations and more taxes and suspect she'll double cross them and actually try to do things without their permission. What to do? It is VERY unlikely Democrats could win the House of Representative UNLESS there is a Clinton landslide - so they do NOT want a Clinton landslide. Essentially they want Clinton the Democrat to win the White House - but NOT by a landslide - with Republicans to hold on to the House of Representatives - barely - and don't really care about the Senate other than they want that also nearly a tie. Why? TWO SPECIFIC REASONS: 1. They want legislative and presidential Gridlock. With Clinton as president but with Republicans holding the house, for which both barely won, means gridlock and gridlock means the status quo - which obviously they like since they get anything they want and just keep getting richer and richer. 2. They want total Power over the politicians in government. IF there is a near 50/50 (52/48ish), both Republican incumbents and Democrat incumbents, plus Clinton, will do ANYTHING THEY WANT for their support and political money. Since ISSUES actually related to government policies are essentially irrelevant, people don't care about issues. With this, Wall Street, Big banks, global corporations and the elite super rich are totally in control of BOTH political parties and, accordingly, totally in control of government. Rather simple reasoning, isn't it? I believe this explains all that has happened. Clinton seemingly would get way ahead, but then the corporate media and press - which are just corporations owned by 6 mega global corporate conglomerates - will run stories and coverage to bump Trump up some and knock Clinton down some. But if Trump gets too close, they then go back at Clinton. In the meantime, they are virtually silent on congressional elections - which favors incumbents and therefore favors Republicans in the House of Representatives. By having separated actual issues about government for the voters attention and focus, by creating partisan gridlock, and by making both sides disparately wanting their big money and support, they are 100% control of both parties and accordingly get anything they want from the Federal government - which of course is for them to just keep getting even richer and more powerful on a global scale. Us peasants will just keep being diverted by scandals having nothing to do with legislation, taxation, war, globalism or the economy by the their propaganda media and press THEY OWN as their public relations propaganda departments.If the MSM will only cover partisan and personality bickering, that is all that will matter to most voters - the perfect deflection from any having to do with government. The discussions, points of focus and editorial of the publications of the super rich and powerful elites was very revealing. They aren't even trying to be secret about it since no ordinary people read them and for the vast majority of voters all of reality and relevancy singularly is what they have their corporate information outlets of the media and press tell people matters.
Globalists are panicking now. They want to just keep it close enough so they can steal it with "plausible deniability". We're gonna find out why the Second Amendment is the SECOND amendment of the Bill of Rights.
As far as concentrating, or the lacking of, on the issues, personally, I think that number 1, Donald knows what the people want to hear regarding the issues we need fixing, but has little or no actual plan on how to actually fix them, since he has very little, ok no, political experience in the process needed to be gone through in order to make those changes. So, much like Obama in his first run, he makes lofty promises, and grandiose statements of the obvious, targeting the mob, who indeed need the changes stated. Number 2, Hillary, being the corrupt politically savvy partisan she is, knows the same, but due to her political experience, can better craft lies, albeit even for such a seasoned partisan hack as herself vague, purported to be truths, as to her promises, & follow her predecessor's taught practices to get the mob to believe her in her ability to actuate these changes. Both candidates have learned well from '08. It's the extremes of BOTH the right, & left, that want a close election. Both extreme sides, see this as a win to continue the process of removing sanity, or better put, moderation, from our political process, thereby paving the way to the slaughterhouse of the America we knew.
The goal and tactics of the elites is obvious. By making the election devoid of issues related to government, getting the public divided into two groups furiously bickering with each other, and making government a partisan deadline nearly evenly divided gives them total power and control. People are so busy bickering with each other very few can see this very obvious strategy.
Gridlock is a good thing; it was the intent of the people who wrote the constitution to make it difficult for the government to enact laws. The less the federal government does, the fewer people gets crewed.
