Federal Judge Rules that U.S. Airports Can't Deport Detained Refugees

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by trucker, Jan 28, 2017.

  1. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    the old end around trick by the libreals i see how will trump counter this stay tune folks its a war of female [​IMG] fed judges against trump
    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...-release-of-detained-refugees-at-jfk-n2278050
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Donnelly
     
  2. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  3. Fisherguy

    Fisherguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2016
    Messages:
    5,023
    Likes Received:
    3,411
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently a rogue president like the Big Cheeto can't just do whatever he wants....
     
  4. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    yeah against army of feminist judges that obama layed those rotten eggs before he left office
     
  5. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  6. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    President Trump is drawing out his enemies so the American people can take care of them. Let's see who will stand in the way of Making America Great Again.
     
  7. APACHERAT

    APACHERAT Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    38,026
    Likes Received:
    16,042
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You don't even have to go to Wiki to see who nominated this liberal activist judge. Just look at her face...liberal activist written all over a her progressive leftist face.

    Take a closer look at her...she almost looks like crooked Hillary Rodham during the 70's. I bet she even has hairy toes just like Hillary.

    President Obama had eight years to politicize the judicial branch of government.

    Judge Ann Donnelly is another leftist NASTY WOMAN.
     
  8. Silver Surfer

    Silver Surfer Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    Messages:
    6,871
    Likes Received:
    2,233
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think Americans were distracted for far too long and kept their eye off the ball. It will take some time to realise how serious damage has been done to the USA. From within. I find this absolutely outrageous.

    George Soros' quiet overhaul of the U.S. justice system

    Progressives have zeroed in on electing prosecutors as an avenue for criminal justice reform, and the billionaire financier is providing the cash to make it happen.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519
     
  9. zbr6

    zbr6 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2013
    Messages:
    12,880
    Likes Received:
    7,355
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The judge has no legal basis to do what she did.

    She needs to be removed from the bench.
     
  10. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Holy (*)(*)(*)(*) dude really? Kinda messed up that you just said that.
     
  11. nra37922

    nra37922 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    13,118
    Likes Received:
    8,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Will be overturned..
     
  12. Battle3

    Battle3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    Messages:
    16,248
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    113
    obama has shown how to go around the law, and how to ignore the law. All Trump has to do is have the appropriate regulatory agency creatively interpret the law to mean whatever Trump wants it to mean, put the banned people on a plane, and fly them out of the country. Done. Then who cares what the ACLU claims, it will take years to work through the Trump DOJ, and if it doesn't go Trumps way then Trump just has the appropriate regulatory agency creatively interpret the new law......and so on.

    By the way, I fully support Trumps ban on immigrants. And I hope Trump plays the obama game and truly reams the "progressives" with their own stick.
     
  13. doombug

    doombug Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    56,871
    Likes Received:
    22,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What is messed up? President Trump has exposed many of these establishment politicians for what they are. If they do not go along with what the people want why should the people vote for them? Do not forget President Trump won some blue states "bigly". Dems may want to tread lightly.
     
  14. dbldrew

    dbldrew Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,813
    Likes Received:
    1,015
    Trophy Points:
    113
    i think he read it that you wanted them taken out by violence rather then voted out
     
  15. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh sorry I misread your post as advocating a second amendment solution.
     
  16. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tomorrow or Monday.

    The judge is meddling in constitutional executive powers in a manner that sees her "stay" as as a de facto executive decision in real time. We are far afield from realistic judicial oversight. Emagine if you will a judge issuing a "stay" for the D Day invasion or the utilization of the atomic bomb on Japan.

    If decisions like this one are allowed the function of the executive becomes subordinate to the judiciary.

    This judge has crossed the line and in doing jeopardizes us all. We did not elect her as chief executive. The Constitution gives no power to the judiciary concerning the mechanism for entry by a foreign national into the jurisdiction of the United States. This is entirely an executive function.

    Quick immediate action is required on national security issues, deliberative hearings are anathema to this reality.

    Cheers

    Cheers
     
  17. guavaball

    guavaball Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2016
    Messages:
    12,203
    Likes Received:
    8,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This BS wont last long. Enjoy your celebration of letting in people our own government admitted they can't vet.

    Way to be a good liberal.
     
  18. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    America, the greatest nation in the world, where a little judge in Brooklyn can tell the President to "go (*)(*)(*)(*) himself!!!!"


    :)
     
  19. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    little feminist judges can really be mean and nasty like:eekeyes:
     
  20. rammstein

    rammstein Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    887
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    18
  21. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did we elect this judge to make executive real world real time decisions? No. Well she's making them and deciding that x can enter the country. It's not a judicial function to make these decisions in real time.

    Interesting and potentially a constitutional crisis.

    Cheers
     
  22. 1up2down

    1up2down New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2012
    Messages:
    2,272
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL..... this was anticipated. trump gets to use this action to show the american People that our justice system is FUBAR.

    Of course the left just walked right into it LOL.

    Now we get to purge all the activist judges who legislate from the bench. This will also be used to get trumps Supreme Court nominees through. Trump will go on Hannity and push the narrative that.... "Our justice system is in bad shape .... very bad. Not all....but A LOT. " he will bring up all sorts of crazy activist judges and how they legislate. Then he will go on to praise Scalia and his SC picks and how the follow the constitution.

    Mark my words and Watch it happen.
     
  23. trucker

    trucker Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    23,945
    Likes Received:
    3,357
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    shes got to stop over stepping her authority she should of ask her Superior justices, on what to do as the federal circuit court
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    First point is no foreign citizen has any right to gain entry into this country. Second Presidents have BROAD discretion on who is allowed to enter. Third persons here on visa's are here at the pleasure of the government.

    Now where does the judge get the jurisdiction to interfere with the President's foreign policy and immigration decisions?
     
  25. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,393
    Likes Received:
    39,279
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Which of course begs the question, where is this judge determining she has judicial power to interfere with the President's decision. Were this December 8th and FDR issues an order to ban all immigration from Japan would she stay the order?
     

Share This Page