LA made $1.3B in illegal immigrant welfare payouts in just 2 years

Interesting. We are basically paying illegals to come and live here. Once they breed, their anchors are no longer considered illegal and whatever money they get doesn't count towards the $1.3 billion.

Also, when this money goes to illegals that means it isn't being spent on the things tax money is supposed to be spent on, i.e. American citizens.

And get a load of the last paragraph where it mentions diversity. We cons know what diversity means, it means anything but white. My guess is LA will be fully diverse when everyone living there is brown or black.

 

Talk about an exaggeration...........

 

"the inclusion of individuals representing more than one national origin, color, religion, socioeconomic stratum, sexual orientation, etc."

That seems to be what bothers some caucasian christian conservatives.......

 

When was the last time you heard someone say 'hey, let's be more diverse and attract and bring in white people?'

 

You have such a warped view on life. Do you think diversity programs exist because of the lack of whites? Really?

 

Does this sound familiar?

"the inclusion of individuals representing more than one national origin, color, religion, socioeconomic stratum, sexual orientation, etc."

 

Exactly. Diversity programs are meant to include other races in addition to whites.

Sorry Steve, but a room with 100% whites is not diverse. That's probably your preference, and that's your right, but that's not diversity.

 

As well it should. Diversity increases conflict and destroys cohesion. It will end up destroying all the good things white Christian conservatives have built.

 

Then you're in the wrong country.

 

Sorry Matt, when latinos make up the largest demographic of an area then importing more of them is not diversity:

The racial/ethnic/cultural composition of Los Angeles as of the 2005-2009 American Community Survey was as follows:[2]

• Hispanic or Latino (of any race): 47.5%
• Non-Hispanic Whites: 29.4%
• Asian: 10.7%
• Black or African American: 9.8%
• Two or more races: 2.8%
• Native American: 0.5%
• Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander: 0.2%
• Other: 25.2%
  
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Los_Angeles

 

I agree, the country is going to the dogs. Fortunately, I am in the right county of that country so my day to day life is unaffected.

 

You just posted 8 different racial/ethnic backgrounds. That's what diversity is. You just made my point for me.

 

That's all right. White people don't want to be in a diverse environment.

 

Then you just make sure you stay right where you are at in that trump county, and don't go wandering outside of it, boy.

 

Quite an accurate statement considering "diversity" is a reaction to too many white people.

If Trump wants to take on the beating heart at the center of the sanctuary city beast he should clean out LA and then California.

$24, 000. per year to house, feed, educate, medicate, incarcerate, etc. every
illegal immigrant. But they bring in more than government spends on them
......right?

 

That's not what he said though.
"We cons know what diversity means, it means anything but white"

Diversity does not mean anything but white. It means other races including whites. That whole inclusion thing is what ticks off white christian conservatives.

 

My only question is why haven't all the liberals given their property to the illegals out there yet? They say America stole the land anyway and is racist against Mexicans. Put your money where your mouth is liberals.

Take the locks out of your doors, leave your keys in your cars. Oh and shut of the damn power your killing us with your carbon footprint

 

You ignored my point. By your own logic we can diversify white areas by bringing in more white people.

 

My logic has remained consistent: diversity happens when you have different entities.

Is an investment portfolio of 100% equities diversified based on asset allocation? No, because the only asset is equity shares. That might be your preference, but it's not diversified.

 

all while leftists cry crocodile tears for America's poor, food insecure black chirrens.

Blacks apparently aren't smart enough to understand that leftists, having secured their loyalty with crumbs, have moved on to other 'victim groups'....illegals, transgenders, Muslims...

maybe they'll wake up one day.

 

Great quote.

Why Trump Is Right about Immigration.

The RAISE Act would limit family immigration rights to the actual nuclear family: husbands, wives, and little kids of American citizens and legal residents. The current categories for adult siblings, adult sons and daughters, and parents would be retired. U.S. citizens could still bring in their elderly parents in need of caretaking, but only on renewable nonimmigrant visas (no green cards or citizenship) and only after proving that they’ve paid for health insurance up front.

The second major element in this restructuring addresses the employment-based immigration flow. It is now a jumble of categories and subcategories, the main result of which is to provide steady work for immigration lawyers. The Cotton-Perdue bill would rationalize this mess by creating one, streamlined points system, along the lines of similar schemes in Canada and Australia. Points would be awarded to potential candidates based mainly on education, English-language ability and age, and those who meet a certain benchmark would be in the pool for green cards, with the top scorers being selected first.

The bill would also eliminate the egregious Diversity Visa Lottery and cap refugee admissions at fifty thousand per year, rather than allow the president let in as many as he wants, as is the case today.

The level of immigration—now running at over a million a year—would likely drop by 40 percent, and then drop some more over time, as the number of foreign spouses declined. (Most U.S. citizens marrying foreigners are earlier immigrants, so as they age, and fewer new immigrants come in behind them, the demand for spousal immigration is likely to fall.) That would still mean annual permanent immigration of 500,000–600,000 a year, which is more than any other nation.

None of this seems unduly harsh, or really anything less than perfectly sensible — naturally then, anyone supporting the bill is “literally Hitler.”

 

"Let me make up a lie in the hopes that blacks will vote GOP".

 

Perhaps in theory but in reality diversity is always touted when someone sees too many white people. Then that becomes a problem.
I have yet to see the diversity of Harlem criticized or a case where LA is seen as "too Hispanic".

 

One more time:

The largest demographic in LA is latinos and the mayor thinks importing more of them is called diversity. Do you agree with him?

 

Too many white people and only white people are two different things.