Assange Has 'Absolute Proof' of Who Gave Him DNC Emails—and It Ain't the Russians

They have no absolute proof. You would know this if you actually read what was written about it.

 

I think Assange has proof it was a democrat operative that gave him the democrat insider info.
I think he is an innocent man being smeared by the deepstate as nothing WikiLeaks has said to date has been false.

The establishment wants him dead/jailed/gagged so he doesn't blow the lid off the NWO and other sick things going on behind our backs and under our noses.

The guy has lost everything in his fight for truth, that's not the mark of a criminal, but a patriot.

Let Assange go free.
Let Assange speak his truth to power and be grateful for his courage.

 

Firstly, it wasn't 17, it was 4. Secondly, the only data they had to work from was from a private company the DNC hired to avoid giving the actual servers to intel. Nobody knows the integrity of those findings. Nobody knows what they missed. Nobody knows if their ability to determine whether or not someone just wanted it to look Russian. Lastly, even if the russians did collect data, it does not mean THEY are the ones who leaked it. More than one source probably had this data.

Anyway, there are no answers as of yet.

 

And where would I read that, Fox News ?

 

This isn't about the DNC server. Its a compilation of the many different things the russians did. You don't need to see where the data came from, all you need to know is who disseminated it. ALL of the major intelligence agencies AGREE.

Its getting laughable the amount of denial by the right, and their refusal to even ask a question while claiming everything Trump a witch hunt. Then is the very next sentence screaming about how we need yet another investigation of Hillary. If the right wants to be taken seriously they have to at least admit that their is enough evidence to warrant an investigation.

 

Their own report.

 

Why don't you copy and paste even one source that claims even ONE intelligence agency has concluded that the Russians had ANY effect upon the election. And when you cant find it, even you will come to know that you are full of ****.

Clapper told Congress on Thursday that intelligence agencies had no way of gauging what influence this meddling had in the outcome of the election.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown...campaign-influence-u-s-election-report-finds/

 

That isn't what the 4 agencies said though. You are either misinformed or inventing that. I require a citation. All I have heard is that they believe, based solely on the conclusions of a private firm because they were denied access, that they believe the russians hacked dnc servers, and they presume it was to harm Clinton.

These are not facts, but assumptions.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...-says-agencies-agree-russian-meddling-n785481

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...-says-agencies-agree-russian-meddling-n785481

 

Innocent people who aided the US were killed because traitors like Bradley Manning gave up classified information, but you lot don't care about that...

 

They confirmed Russia's involvement in other ways than just crowd strike

 

Yet you trust Manning friend Assange?

 

This can't be pointed out enough!

 

He's not, you are correct. But the REASON he holds himself up in the embassy is because he knows that he will face charges. He's said it a million times

 

Of course not, why would you think that or imply that?

 

Did you notice not a single word supports your assertion? Evidently not.

 

They didn't confirm Russias Hacking of the DNC server and had nothing to support the claim that it was Russia who provided to Wikileaks the info.

 

Exactly what I said, and not what you said.

They believe russians hacked dems, basedon information provided by a private firm, and because that information was deciminated, it is agreed that this was to hurt clinton.

Assange knows where the information came from. If it was not Russians, then whether or not the russians even hacked them is moot. If it was an inside job, by burnie supporters, made to look like a russian hack or even discovered tracking down a russian hack, and then delivering to wikileaks, there is no better cover.

I say we leave no stone unturned. I say we hear what Assange has to say. I have absolutely nothing to fear. You do.

 

Not at all, I know some (most) in the intelligence community are career people, only the top figures are appointed and typically these are also individuals with lengthy intelligence community careers. The career people ought to put country before party, they typically do, I know some (in the DIA) and don't question their integrity, but Trump has been quite critical of this intelligence community and there is evidence they reciprocate. I doubt every member of the intelligence community is involved in a conspiracy, but just as they messed up with the Saddam thing they could compartmentalize and mess up with this Russian collusion thing.

 

Yah they did. The right hates and underestimated our Intel capabilities lately.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...personally-involved-u-s-election-hack-n696146

 

That is not the only reason they know it was Russia. Our Intel agencies do more than read the newspaper lol

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...personally-involved-u-s-election-hack-n696146

 

Yes. They do more than just read them. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

 

You mean the assertion that the intelligence community agrees that the Russians meddled in our elections ?

 

Happened back in January