Assange Has 'Absolute Proof' of Who Gave Him DNC Emails—and It Ain't the Russians

They needed voter data to help trump?

 

Nice response. Doesn't prove a damn thing. They didn't even try to access the registry. It's what you alt left extremists hate to hear because you want it to be false.

 

The Hillary trolls are ridiculous today.

 

Again the right shows how little it knows about the Russian meddling. Not covered on fox or talk radio I guess?

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/09/jared-kushner-data-operation-russia-facebook/amp

 

Let's assume that's true. This is according to who? DHS? Since when do you trust Intel agencies???

 

If Assange presented verifiable evidence, I would accept it, that doesn't mean I'd trust Assange as far as I could throw him...

 

So now you're going after the DHS to blame when the facts didn't go your way? You're getting more pathetic by the minute.

You have ZERO evidence any registries were tampered, or attempted to be hacked. As proven, they accessed the general market, they didn't even attempt to enter the system.

If you have this magical evidence that contradicts the DHS and all of the voting stations in the entire United States, please present it.

My guess is, if you do have evidence, you found it in the conspiracy theory threads.

 

They didn't need to tamper

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/09/jared-kushner-data-operation-russia-facebook/amp

 

Was that how they knew who to dog whistle with facebook ads?

 

Switching the topic from altering voting stations to facebook. You've cited this a million times so I'm assuming this is all the evidence you can come up with, since everything contradicts your voting station theory. The fact that Russia legally bought ad space is your highest fact, speaks volumes. This article is filled with "what if Americans helped?" and other scenarios there's no proof of.

Quit digging your hole so deep.

 

They hacked voter data to know who to target with ads. Try and keep up or at least read the link

 

So you say.

 

Citizens United

 

First, you missed the point....not surprisingly......

1. The FBI says nobody got in to any of the vote tallying systems.
2. The FBI CONFIRMED that they did get into a a voter registration system in Illinois, and a voting station worker database, AND they were able to get into the systems of a voting machine software vendor.

We know for a fact that their disinformation campaign, and their release of emails from the DNC DID hurt the left in the election. These are simple facts. My rebut to the "21 attempts" was pointing out that this is not the only way to affect the election

 

Are you being Obtuse ?

You seriously want to debate that the Russian disinformation campaign had no effect on the election ?

 

Trump ought to tell Assange, "Get lost; I don't need your evidence. The collusion charge isn't going stick anyway."

 

There's been nothing preventing him releasing any information he has for a long time. If he does have what he claims, he's chosen to keep it secret all this time for some reason.

You are aware he's Australian? Regardless of your opinion of him, nothing he's done in relation to the US can be called patriotism.

 

Certainly not in your mind. Like a religious belief that isn't subject to facts. Don't you find it odd that you cant find a single published source to support your assertion?

 

From your article-
"The latest intelligence said to show Putin's involvement goes much further than the information the U.S. was relying on in October, when all 17 intelligence agencies signed onto a statement attributing the Democratic National Committee hack to Russia."

There was no such statement. 13 of the 17 had no involvement whatsoever. Your article is citing crap made up by the Hillary campaign as facts. Why would I trust what they report from un named sources?

 

Well, just the entire premise of his WikiLeaks creation as a place where people can anonymously provide leaked information. I suspect his proof that the Russians didn't provide him any of the DNC emails, is evidence of who actually did turn over the emails.

 

Yes. Guilty. He was recently in the news. Denied entry into Canada.

http://nypost.com/2017/09/26/chelsea-manning-denied-entry-to-canada/

 

I'm talking about Assange

 

Well, in her defense, she could have been relying upon Obama's publisher who put in his bio, that he was born in Kenya.

 

EVERY one of the major intelligence agencies says they did influence the election. Influence means "effect". Deny all you want, thats what they said.

The cult of Trump amazes me. Your arguing a known against a known fact because of a political hatred for democrats. Denial that the Russians influenced (read: EFFECTED) the election is ridiculous. The fake adds were designed with a purpose, but because nobody has come out with a hard number to say "it gave Trump an extra 500,000 votes", you claim it had no affect. Its just laughable the denial that the right is in.

But hell, you still don't believe that the Trump campaign never met with the Russians at any time. They told you they never did, so they never did. The Cult of Trump is built on the denial of facts. Why would you believe them now

 

Your article didn't even as much as contain the word influence. Your views are purely a product of the ideas bouncing around in your own head.