"Banning semi autos certainly WOULD address mass shootings"

You have to load all magazines one round at a time.

 

none. The police should have them only. And the police are bad...um... wait...

 

He could have killed many more with a car bomb what's your point ?

 

Or simply renting a truck and driving over them.

No calls for background checks to have a vehicle.

 

Yeah, it says well regulated

Which means working properly

 

And you can preload bags and bags of them before you go shoot 500 people.

Stop trolling

 

Well regulated militia literally means effective militia

The left is trying to change the meaning of well regulated to government oversight

 

Here is what it says

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

That's "Well Regulated..."as described in the Constitution

 

Yeah, as I said, effective

"Well regulated " does not mean having to submit an application to the government and being in a database like I've heard the left say

 

You just quoted the Constitution and didn't understand what you read?

Try again. Read slowly and sound out the words as you go

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

 

And you can preload bags and bags of moon clips before you go on a rampage with a revolver

I'm simply provoking you into demonstrating how little you know about this subject. You debating this is like an anti-vaxxer debating vaccination policy.

But call it trolling if it makes you feel better.

 

It says the government wants an effective militia they can employ when they need to

It says nothing of applications or registration like the left wants when they site the phrase "well regulated"

 

Serious question: have you ever changed a magazine? I mean I know it can be done fairly quick but the blink of an eye is a huge exaggeration.

That's all a part of the duties of Congress. It's saying that Congress can and should help states establish militias; think National Guard. It does not mean that there can only be one militia (example would be a town militia having nothing to do with the defense of the state or federal government). Also worth noting that the Second clearly states that it is the right of the people, not the right of the militia, to keep and bear arms. Huge difference.

 

And stacking them in a bag can bend them making them jam. https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/reloading-revolver-moon-clips/

Fail.

 

staking magazines in a bag can make them bend and cause the gun to jam.

At least I have you googling things and educating yourself finally.

Its mostly low information people that want To ban big scawy guns.

 

Where did your nonsense about "applications and registrations" come from? Your own imagination?

It was in the second that because we (at that time) need a well regulated militia that arms should be available for that purpose (and no other). It does NOT say you can't have arms for other purposes ...it simply ONLY addresses them in this regard.

It also describes what that Well Regulated Militia would look like...how it would be organized...and what it's duties would be.

Mo amount of bullshit changes what it says

 

Rectangular magazines? Hardly. I thought you knew guns.

Not so much. All you seem to know is trolling

 

This is the only militia mentioned in the Constitution. This militia is well regulated...organized, trained, and has discipline and officers. This militia has the right to arm themselves.

No other militia is covered under the Constitution

 

Banning vehicles would address vehicle fatalities.
Banning rope/nylons would address strangulations.
Banning pools would address pool drownings.
Banning spoons would address obesity.
Banning small objects would address infant choking.
Banning household chemicals would address accidental poisoning.
Banning drugs would address overdoses.
etc.

 

An AR 15 doesn't use a rectangular magazine. And I have had magazine issues. Slipping retainers and warpage.

Whatever you have to tell your self.

 

And there are still over 10,000 drunk driver fatalities per year.

Laws don't stop crime.

 

You need to stop embarrassing yourself

 

By that logic we should not have any laws at all huh...

 

Its curved. You think rectangles have curves?

 

So you've gone full ostrich and didn't see the link where they sell you a CNC mill that can make receivers out of a solid hunk of metal for less than a good quality AR costs? Do I have to post it again?