Republicans: Do you now believe the Mueller Report should be accepted by all?

#alternativefacts

 

I learns a lot here.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe Mueller's task was to investigate the relationship between trump and Russia. Further, I do believe that investigation brought up a number of other crimes that trump could be involved in and those were referred to the Southern District of New York to investigate and handle accordingly. Sooo, so far you have Mueller's report that appears to clear trump of any wrong doings with Russia. If only that was his only problem. I think your back slapping is going to be quite short lived because everyone, including his base, knows he's nothing more than a con man.

 

In case you haven't noticed, the Trumpster two step is alive and well, and Trumpster and right wing media are eager to substitute their made up scandal for the one involving their fuhrer and his Russian benefactors.

 

Oh I'm quite aware of all the baseless slanderous accusations the Democrat #FakeNews media has been making about Trump for years only because he upset the apple cart by resoundingly beating Crooked Hillary Clinton. I just think it's unwise to continue the damage their doing to their own reputations by piling on more false allegations. Lord knows there are plenty of gullible suckers out their who will buy into it just like they did with the phony Russian dossier and Special Counsel #WitchHunt.

 

You're wrong,, JabberFungi, there is no such thing as left-wing media. And certainly not mine. So I don't respond for ... whatever it is you think they did.

My question is simple: do you believe the Mueller report is trustworthy, yes or no. Turns out, some are now saying that they're not sure that it exonerates Trump. Interesting, given that yesterday and this morning they were celebrating all over the place. I don't know what happened. But apparently there was some sort of turn-around, and now they're not so sure that it does. Haven't been able to figure out what changed but...

Still I'd like to know: do you or do you not trust the Mueller report? Or does it just depend on whether you like the conclusions or not?

 

If at first you don’t succeed, you won’t suceed at second, too. Do your worst.

 

It must be terribly disappointing for Trump haters to see such a massive effort fail. Trump is still president and has a good chance to be re-elected.

How do they like those apples?

 

You are right, but since he found none perhaps you ought to look at this with a bit more skepticism since it turns out, EVERYONE'S BEEN LYING TO YOU.

PRESIDENT TRUMP is your President and many of us our proud of the job he's done. Maybe you might want to stop being a tool of Vladimir Putin and start trying to unify our country and stop being so divisive?

 

Will you also let me know at the time if he exonerates Trump? Or did you already read that part?

Trump cultists are so much fun!

 

And by "track record" you mean exonerating Trump? Or are you not celebrating that with the wingnut media?

 

It appears Mueller might have played it straight up after all, not wanting to join the conspiracy of Comey and others. We must wait and see to make that assessment Massah Golem.

 

Only the parts of the report that shows that Donald Trump was in direct collusion with Putin and the Kremlin to change the outcome of the election.

 

Not only does this exonerate Trump, it proves that there was no election meddling by Putin and that Crooked Hillary lost fair and square. Not only did she rig the election against Bernie, she tried to rig the general election by colluding with Russia while claiming Trump colluded with Russia! What a pathetic loser! She couldn't win even by cheating!

 

Muller was your folk’s patron saint till yesterday. The question should be are you gonna except his findings?

 

I don't know what to think about Barr. Didn't have much hope for him. But he appears to be acting honestly. If it's true he's coordinating his release with Mueller and Rossenstein. We'll see.

 

yeah, I will wait for all the investigations to complete, Trump can hold up a "mission accomplished" sign all day long, but we know what happened when Bush did that, or when Nixon said... I'm not a crook"

 

Ok, JabberFungi. So you answered the question twice. First it was that you did trust him. And then that you only trusted him if his conclusion was convenient to you. The cult will probably be proud of you. But you have had multiple opportunities to tell us how "awful" you think Mueller is, and you have declined. So it's obvious that any criticisms in the future will be due only to the fact that his conclusions didn't suit your idol. You cannot escape it. But with the added ignominy that you were unable to express your beliefs clearly and honestly.

 

So does that mean you trust the Mueller Report? I ask again: Yes or no?

 

I have always said I would accept his findings. I said it before and I say it now. I might or might not agree with his actions (I'll tell you when I know what his actions are). But I accept his findings unequivocally. If he says Trump did not participate in his campaign's collusion with Russia, didn't cover it up, didn't interfere with the investigation, and didn't obstruct justice... that's good enough for me.

Now. Let's see your answer. Do you trust Mueller's report? Yes or no? Out with it, already!

 

Asked and answered. I trust it so far as it has exonerated Trump. As for the rest, we'll wait and see. Mueller is conflicted and untrustworthy.

 

Oh, I most definitively accept the report. Not only do I accept it, but I want to know everything leading up to it. We know that American traitors sought to falsely accuse the President of crimes he didn't commit, and that must not go unpunished. First, Christopher Steele must be brought into jurdisction to stand trial on the following charges:

-Perjury
-Lying to the FBI
-Lying to a Federal Judge(since his document was used in the FISA courts.)
-Obstruction of Justice
-Falsification of Evidence(we now know at least part of his material used open-ended sources. Confirmed by him and by Simpson. Far from 'intelligence')

After that, I'd like to issue a subponea to Alexander Downer to get his testimony under oath. Because Mueller's indictment on Papadoulous said one thing, and Downer said another to the Daily Caller. This needs to be reconciled, because it obviously doesn't par up with the final result of no indictments.

I'd love to bring Misfud and the rest of the little actors in this charade as well, but he went AWOL and is possibly dead, and Halper is some old fossil who likely doesn't remember anyway(at least, not without reference points which maybe we can provide him with.)

 

And if any such evidence of that existed, you'd think Mueller would prosecute it. Fake news started this investigation, the truth is finally ending it and I can say with conscious: Facebook ads, Twitter Bots, awful looking ads that were misspelled did not influence the American Election. To the extent that even the Wikileaks emails may have influenced it, it was remote.(As reported by Exit polls in the 2016 election.)

We knew damn well, then, now and forever that the queen must not be crowned on the edifice of her incompetence. Hence, she lost to a Donald Trump to begin with.

 

1. I hate to burst your bubble but people with a brain must hear both sides of the story before they can even begin to form an opinion.... Once we hear Mueller's accusations (if any) and the rebuttal by Trump and his team (if at all needed), then we'll be equipped to reach conclusions. Not until we hear both sides....

2. After "will you accept the result of 2016 election....but we won't if we lose" and "will you accept Mueller's report results....but we won't if Trump is not frog-marched" that the liberal TDS mob has been practicing, the libs have exposed themselves as liars unwilling to hold their end of the bargain and they have lost the right to ask these sort of questions.

PS that being said, the fact that no one in Trump's inner circle has been charged with anything even remotely related to Russia makes it pretty obvious that there is no there, there.

 

Wait and see what? What rest? You're all over the map. You said you hadn't seen it. But then you do know that it exonerated Trump. And then you need to "wait and see". Wait and see if it exonerates anybody else?

So let's put it this way: do you trust the Mueller report in all that pertains to Trump?