Judge: Stop Sending Asylum Seekers to Mexico

The judge is the one who is insane

The assylum seeker arrived at the border from mexico and thats where he needs to be returned to

Although sending him back to his home country would kind of ruin his day also

 

End the refugee loophole and we dont need more judges

Because if we dont millions of shoeless central Americans will move to America

 

Ignoring the process that is right out there in the open for everyone to see seems, well dark, and purposeful too....

 

Necessity has always been the mother of invention, unless it is presented to a modern democrat, or village idiot. So, given we no longer live in the world that our immigration laws were created, we either end the refugee status, or we narrow it down so that only special cases are acceptable.

If these people south of us, were not told they could come into the land of milk and honey and escape the shi*thole nations they are responsible for, we would not see these caravans of the poor wanting to live in the land of milk and honey.

Ask yourself a simple question. Would most of the world's poor, and those from shi*thole nations come into the US, if only they could? Be honest, if possible. Hell, just ask if 1/2 or 1/4 of the worlds poor would come here if they could.

It says much about the US that people want to come here, although more poor than success do, but reality comes with natural restrictions, as to why they cannot come here. That is, unless you are a modern democrat. Or at least the ones we hear in all of this noise.

And honestly, I am still astounded that so many democrats can be unreasonable and irrational, and not up to the challenge. They seem to have no understanding of intelligence managing much of anything.

And if anyone voices such intelligence, all they can utter are derogatory terms like, racist! IMO, not many of them are fit to run the US, even as badly as I despise most establishment republicans. We just don't have enough rulers in the intelligent center, IMO. Not enough pragmatists either. And if you can find one, like IMO, Gabbard, (although I still don't know her position on illegal immigration, or the poor being counted as refugees) boy oh boy does the establishment military industrial complex, democrats and MSM try to tear her a new *********, in the most dishonest and lack of integrity fashion. As they did trump from the get-go. And it was his position while campaigning that caused this early on, and it came from both sides, not just the left. Lest we forget.

 

There is not one democrat with enpigh common sense or love for America who can deal with the illegal alien problem

 

Last I looked, the "asylum seekers" aren't from Mexico. They are from other countries south of Mexico. So, how is not allowing them into the US and maintaining them in Mexico sending them back to where they are in danger? Are they in danger in Mexico? Didn't they, to a person, walk or somehow traverse the entire country of Mexico to get to the Southern Border? They seem to have all made it safely by the time they present themselves for asylum. So what is the judge thinking here? Just to old or senile to understand he's protecting folks from something that isn't threatening to them? What a loon.

 

Well, there is a political angle to this a well. Do they so eagerly go after democratic presidents, and as often, when there is a legal question involved?

If it is impossible to house such numbers, due to insufficient facilities, then it would seem the judge is more of an idiot than what you think of him. And so, anyone trying to enforce a law must be able to be flexible, for what is impossible does not change because he says the pres cannot do this or that. And that 9th circuit seems to not really give a damn. Because they are political, and anyone who has a living brain cell knows that.

 

I'd start ignoring these activist judges from Limpwristville.

 

So, then, the lowering of judges was done to create this refugee crisis?

 

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

 

Judges were not lowered

End the refugee loophole and more jusges are not needed

 

And where do you expect to find these Judges?
Where are you going to find the qualified legal staff these Judges would need?
Where would these Judges be set-up?
What would be the criteria for granting asylum? If asylum is not granted, what is to be done with the asylum seekers?
What is your plan to feed and house these asylum seekers until their trial?
How would you fund these Judges and their support staff?

Currently, there are about 350 Judges. There are over 1,000,000 cases in backlog. The current wait time for a trial is over 2 years (720 days).

The idea that we can just "grow" Judges, in order to process the number of asylum seekers in a timely manner, shows a lack of understanding of the situation.

https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-immigration-courts/
https://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/court_backlog/
https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/536/

EDIT: BTW.....the number of Judges has not lowered.

 

There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution and we should be upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure.

 

Abolish our drug war; it only creates more refugees for you right wingers to whine about.

 

We do not need a single one of the barefoot refugees crashing our border

Just repeal the assylum loophole

 

Upgrading Ellis Island and surrounding infrastructure is more open.

 

nobody takes the right wing seriously about morals. There is no immigration clause in our Constitution and Only illegals don't care about the law.

 

You want all of America to look like the streets of San Francisco and seattle?

 

It is time to impeach scofflaw judges.

 

You finally said something that makes sense

Illegals do not respect our laws

 

Painting them as "barefoot refugees" is a misrepresentation. While these people heading to our southern border are poor, they really are not "barefoot". I don't think it really helps your argument to continue to use that term. Painting them as being barefoot might actually create more sympathy for them....it would be a term I would expect MSNBC to use.

 

Many of them do not speak spanish much less English

They will be a great burden of our socisl servises that are at their wits end already

These refugees have no business being in the US

 

They’re just enforcing existing law. Why is it so hard for trump and crew to follow the law?

 

I do understand it

We should change the law

 

Quite right - they were not actively lowered...but the numbers have lowered due to retirements and quitting - and they are not being replaced.

In recent months, many judges, who oversee asylum claims and deportation cases, have retired or resigned citing interference in how they were handling cases.

“This administration has justified so many of their more draconian policies in terms of ‘We have got to lower the backlog’ and then all of a sudden they don’t have the funds to hire more immigration judges,” said Jeffrey Chase, a former immigration judge. “If their true goal is to provide fair adjudications more quickly, then this is inconsistent with that. More people will wait longer.”

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...dministration-immigration-judges-hiring-pause