Farm Groups Sound Alarm Over Trump’s China Trade War Escalation

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Natty Bumpo, Aug 5, 2019.

  1. tomfoo13ry

    tomfoo13ry Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That makes no sense and I think you know it. When the market-wide yield of any crop decreases prices generally go up not down. That's basic economics.
     
    ronv and JakeStarkey like this.
  2. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reduced crop sizes increases prices not lower them.
     
  3. tomfoo13ry

    tomfoo13ry Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That's right. And many farmers have had a tough time getting their crops in the ground this year, so in normal times, prices would be through the roof. Instead we're in the midst of a trade war and farmers are being forced to either accept government handouts or possibly be ruined. It's a slap in the face to the people who feed this nation.
     
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2019
  4. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,633
    Likes Received:
    9,703
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    LOL drop the subsidies
    Lot's of manipulation in ag markets but yes prices will go up never said they wouldn't, hell they already have at different times this year. When actual harvest reports start showing up corn will go up, and most grains will follow.
     
  5. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We have some here failing while flailing futilely to defend Trump's tariffs.
     
    mdrobster likes this.
  6. tomfoo13ry

    tomfoo13ry Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    15,962
    Likes Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    83
    It's easy to laugh and shrug it off but without this market facilitation program a lot of people would be losing farms that have been in their family for generations.

    I'm a free market guy all the way but in this situation it's either bail out the farmers or hand our food supply over to mega corporations. It's not farmer John's fault that the market has been subverted with a tariff war.
     
  7. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,611
    Likes Received:
    14,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake Don keeps paying more and more taxpayer money into his multi-billion dollar welfare program for American farmers he has screwed, but he can't keep pulling that stunt.
    * Nor signed into law his promised "something terrific!" healthcare plan the "covers everybody!" at "less cost!", nor built a single mile of his "big, beautiful wall!" that he guaranteed Mexico would pay for, nor kept his vow to rebuild America's crumbling infrastructure, nor released his repeatedly promised tax returns. Only his bum kissers still believe that climate change is a Chinese hoax, though.
     
    mdrobster likes this.
  8. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,285
    Likes Received:
    12,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you oppose Trump's socialist welfare handouts for farmers that plant crops for export, but support his socialist welfare handouts for farmers that plant crops for domestic consumption?
     
  9. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Some Liberal is always calling president Trump an IMBECILE or pathetic or MORON; it's an indication of how much Liberals are pissed at him for doing well. If they weren't, I'd be worried.
     
  10. Dutch

    Dutch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    46,383
    Likes Received:
    15,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nah... until November 3rd, 2020 will do. After that, we'll stop osculating for a while but you will continue oscillating until 2024 elections :)
     
  11. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Domestic food production is critical to a country's security. The alternative is leaving the population at the mercy of foreign exporters, and global inflation. Domestic food suppliers receive subsidies when global suppliers flood the domestic market and create a glut, and prices / profits plunge. They benefit from tariffs on imported food supplies, and it's why I drew the distinction.
     
  12. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,285
    Likes Received:
    12,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you DO support Trump's socialist welfare handouts. Thanks for confirming.
     
    mdrobster likes this.
  13. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I said that ... twice. Will the 3rd time be the charm? I support subsidizing US domestic food suppliers.
     
  14. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,725
    Likes Received:
    16,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, when do you draw the line? What group or industry will Trump be forced to subsidize when their business dries up because of a Trump trade war?

    Steel, coal?

    Funny how you “conservatives” start cheering for subsidies when they are the victims of Trump’s stupidity.

    Trump is already headed for a trillion dollar deficit with no end in sight.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2019
    mdrobster and bx4 like this.
  15. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm a big fan of protectionism. If you read my 3 previous replies you'll see where I draw the line on subsidies. Domestic manufacturers who supply goods to domestic consumers must be protected. Either by banning or taxing foreign imports. Your deficit strawman doesn't fly because tariffs are being collected, and the taxes collected is greater than the offsetting subsidies. There's been no inflation either. Xi Ping bought up China's failing stocks to absorb corporate losses, and he's just been forced to go a step further and manipulate / devalue China's currency to make China's exports cheaper. WINNING!
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2019
  16. bx4

    bx4 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    15,285
    Likes Received:
    12,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So socialism / welfare is not inherently bad in your eyes. Good to know.
     
  17. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh my! I'm a socialist! I t was really obvious right from the begining that you were totally clueless and completely disinterested in the economic theory behind tariffs and subsidies. You contributed literally nothing to the thread.
     
  18. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,459
    Likes Received:
    14,814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is an internal problem in China. My concern is with what China's behavior does to Americans.
     
  19. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,725
    Likes Received:
    16,178
    Trophy Points:
    113
    History has long since discredited protectionism as a viable economic policy.
     
  20. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,459
    Likes Received:
    14,814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thorny question. Like you I despise government subsidizing anything. What is going on here is an economic war with China who has been stealing from us over decades.

    The tariffs are ammunition in that war but, in this case, the war has a crippling effect on the agricultural sector. In effect, the farmers and ranchers of America are bearing almost all of the cost of the war. The currency manipulation on the part of China has removed most of the effects of the trade war on consumers. But the farmers and ranchers are sellers, not consumers and they have lost a big customer because of government actions. Over time they will replace the business with sales to other customers but for now they need to survive.

    Hence the temporary subsidies. When the trade war ends we want to see an intact agricultural sector. If the ag sector were failing on its own action, I would decry the subsidies. But the ag sector is innocent. They are being hurt by government action and government is helping them get through it. Subisidies are common all over the world. We can't sell rice to Japan because of subsidies, for instance. The Japanese want an intact ag sector just like we do.

    I was against the subsides to the car manufacturers because they got themselves into trouble. They can blame whatever they like but the blame was really theirs. I support these subsidies because the government did it and should bandage the wound temporarily.
     
  21. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,459
    Likes Received:
    14,814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would that explain the fact that every country engages in it? Free trade is an ideal but, unfortunately, it has never existed.
     
  22. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,459
    Likes Received:
    14,814
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The smart ones to be sure. This trade war won't go well for China as long we keep the current administration.
     
  23. Right is the way

    Right is the way Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2013
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    1,584
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Some farmers. I farm and I definitely am not terrified.
     
  24. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ^^^ ;) Of course you are not. Do you have contracts with China markets?
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2019
  25. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Protectionism hasn't been discredited and it isn't intended to be implemented permanently. It's used as "stimulus" and what it stimulates is responsible domestic industry investment in global markets, and fair trade policies between global competitors. The question isn't whether Trump's policy will work, it's a question of whether Xi Ping will continue to absorb China's losses. Xi Ping can probably survive until 2020. I think he intends to, because Trump's opponents will remove the tariffs and Ping can begin recouping losses once they do. BUT ... Xi Ping devaluation of currency can't be setting well with China's workers who'll start seeing significant inflation begin eating their paychecks.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2019

Share This Page