BREAKING: House impeachment investigators release transcripts of first two deposition testimonies

The Lock him up happened in the deepest swamp of them all, in the Washington DC where by definition no one likes Trump... was it not?

 

If Schiff and Pelosi can look for evidence of a crime in a phone call, they can look for evidence in an election. Joe, Bernie and Liz will get thrashed next November.

Thanks Adam and Nancy

 

I do not see him that way. Even though I am not a Democrat as I believe they have also sold out working people and are usually real sissies when it comes to confronting GOP crooks it’s nice to see them finally playing hardball with scumbag liar Trump. It’s way overdue in my opinion. Schiff seems to be doing a great job considering the kind of lying sleazebags who are presently attacking him. Good for him. I wish him all the luck in the world.

 

No one except for the gutless pack of GOP whores in the House and the Senate.

 

Not his elders, your elders.

 

Tsk, tsk, tsk. So much anger over legitimately elected officials.

Oh that's right. You have so much blind hate for PRESIDENT TRUMP, this is just the spill over.

 

What is your assessment of his "more than circumstantial evidence" statement?

 

I think he calls it the way he sees it thus he must think there is more than circumstantial evidence of criminal activity. Pretty normal for a former prosecutor.

What is your take on Trump’s “human scum” statement regarding those who oppose him politically or legally?

 

Not really anger but disgust of one who has followed politics closely since 1964. This group of GOP congress members from both houses are by far the most gutless and disgusting I have ever seen. Hopefully most of them will get voted out soon.

 

Or trumps legal team? Lol
But please, keep bringing up ancient history so I can keep bringing up the present lol

 

"I think he calls it the way he sees it thus he must think there is more than circumstantial evidence of criminal activity. Pretty normal for a former prosecutor."

I think that it's outright lying.

"What is your take on Trump’s “human scum” statement regarding those who oppose him politically or legally?"

I think that that is too general of a question to answer with a single answer. It depends on the tactics used by those who oppose him. The worst are scum, some are misguided, and some just disagree.

Those who make up crap, or support those who make up crap, are scum.

 

Listen to the news from the transcripts released today. That tells the real story about Trump & his Presidential self-service rather than national service.

 

You mean this statement?

Schiff: "More than circumstantial evidence" Trump campaign colluded with Russia

I don't know what Schiff had as early as March 2017, but based on what we know now, he was eventually proven 100% correct.

Trump Tower Meeting... WAY more than circumstantial....

He didn't say there was an organized conspiracy and he didn't say DONALD J TRUMP.

That's my assessment.

 

Indeed. In Washington, no one likes President Trump.

Is exactly what I’ve said.

 

From what I have heard directly from Trump’s mouth and read in investigative reports I tend to agree with Schiff’s statement and I do not believe there is evidence that he was outright lying. I respect your right to disagree with me and Schiff regarding the statement you cited but I do not agree with your assertion that he was outright lying.

As far as Trump’s continual viscious attacks on political opponents and silly namecalling which he has been engaged in from the beginning of his campaign in 2015 up to now, I think it makes him look like a loudmouthed buffoon. However what is even more repugnant is his constant whining whenever anyone responds in kind. I grew up in a tough neighborhood and have always despised whiney little sissies. Especially ones with a big mouth.

 

Wrong, the gutless ass lickers in the GOP House and Senate are his biggest fans and enablers.

 

Is it then a slam-dunk that Schiff will issue indictments against these conspirators? The ones that Mueller couldn't find?

 

Funny you should mention that, with a certain trial starting tomorrow....

 

One meeting isnt collusion. Any objective person would admit there is no evidence of collusion.

 

"I do not agree with your assertion that he was outright lying."

Really? Where is his "more than circumstantial evidence"? When will he present it?

 

I confess that I'm out of the loop. What trial is starting tomorrow?

 

2016 called. It wants its prediction back...

 

They are vile authoritarians that hate our self-rule.

Bureaucras’ Think Their Hurt Feelings On Foreign Policy Justify Impeachment.

You see, it’s perfectly fine for Hillary Clinton to use her campaign funds to hire foreign national Christopher Steele to investigate Trump using (probably made-up) Russian sources. And there’s nothing wrong with the FBI using those partisan Steele smears to investigate the Obama administration’s political opponent.​

Crossfire Hurricane, the official operational title for the investigation, employed assistance from the British government and an Australian diplomat. So the left believes there’s nothing wrong with asking a foreign government for help to investigate a domestic political opponent — so long as that opponent is Trump. After all, “Nobody is above the law, not even Donald Trump.” But if the shoe ends up on the other foot and Trump is the one investigating, it’s a constitutional crisis!​

If you listen for more than a few minutes, you realize what’s really going on here is that Trump failed to prostrate himself before the “dedicated career professionals” who possess the “experience and expertise” that Trump supposedly lacks in foreign policy. Read your Constitution. Article II vests the power of foreign policy in the elected president. These “dedicated career professionals” aren’t even mentioned in the Constitution.​

Maybe we shouldn’t have a national impeachment circus over the hurt feelings of bureaucrats.​

The level of fuss indicates that this is over much more than “hurt feelings,” but actual criminal activity at risk of exposure.



“Hypothesis: The spying-on-Trump thing is worse than we even imagine, and once it was clear Hillary had lost and it would inevitably come out, the Trump/Russia collusion talking point was created as a distraction.”

 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/14/poli...k-court-judge-russia-investigation/index.html

Since he screwed around with the judge on his gag order, this guy has been quieter than Mike Pompeo defending somebody on his staff....

Stone is one of two guys who associated themselves with Trump who is not a complete imbecile (the other being Bannon).

 

Hypothesis: You cannot get through TSA at airports with all the tin foil wrapped around you...