Trump Food-Stamp Cuts Blocked by Judge Who Cites Pandemic

so you like activist judges as long as they are republicans?

 

stealing money from the military.. example enough for you?

how about withholding funds to Ukraine for political gain?

Congress control the purse strings, not the President

 

If you keep a major employer from shutting down and employees get to keep their jobs isn't that pretty much as you described?

 

Wish you felt the same about that fir all the Judges the right appointed this year to federal judgeships who had little to no trial experience

 

You posted that he “claimed to be a constitutional scholar” as if it was a lie. He actually thought it, that would make him a constitutional scholar by definition

Now you want to make other claims that aren’t true.

Your embarrassing yourself. Let it go

 

How many presidents have been billionaires (or claimed to have been)?

You honestly believe that? liberals are simply selfish and greedy & do not donate? I know of several liberals who are friends of mine and donate to various charities each and every year such as the United Way, American Heart Associate and Make-A-Wish Foundation, so I'm calling your accusation totally false.

 

Article III, Section 2 = https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

All public laws generally contain clauses that specify how disputes are to be resolved.

It can specify arbitration or judicial review and the procedures that must be followed.

Google some and you will see.

 

What? How exactly can Congress prohibit judicial review? That's the whole point of the judiciary. To ensure the laws created by Congress fall within the Constitution...

 

Prove that is happening by citing her 84 page Ruling on the matter where she is setting "executive policy".

 

Your criminal IMPOTUS decided to starve children long BEFORE the current state of national emergency.

 

I like originalist judges. Just because you think someone is an activist judge it doesn't mean anything. What means something is what the SCOTUS rules.

 

Here was the original question:

Now, WTF are you talking about? A judge held funds for Ukraine? Which judge was it? Please provide a link. I will wait.

 

Wrong again!

Congress passed SNAP legislation and it was SIGNED into the Law of the Land.

Your criminal IMPOTUS is now trying to illegally OBSTRUCT these 700,000 hungry children from getting the food that Congress not only legislated they could but also FUNDED their food.

The Judge is UPHOLDING the Law of the Land that your criminal IMPOTUS is nefariously VIOLATING in this instance.

 

One wouldn't know that if they looked at his record with all the issues he had overturned in court.

 

Wrong!

When your criminal IMPOTUS violates the Law of the Land it is the Courts that hold him accountable.

 

Actually the Constitution STIPULATES that WE THE PEOPLE..."do ordain and establish this Constitution"!

 

No. Just...no. Judges cannot do the same. That you want them to is highly disturbing. Activist judges should be avoided at all costs no matter what side of the line you are on.

 

Read the Constitution and Google some public laws.

 

Don't much care about the legality, but it's the right decision for the situation regardless of how one feels about safety nets. We can't have poor people who are sick choose between hunger and spending even more time working in public spreading COVID. They need to be able to call in sick, or put off finding the non-existent new job given the way the economy is freezing up, and food stamps will help them to do that. Hell public health officials have the authority to do it in in a public health emergency like this.

Judges do have a tendency to be the adults in the room, applying reason to the policies of the childish idiots who are elected based upon charisma.

 

Congress specifies how complaints are to be handled when it writes the particular law. It can restrict it if it wants to.


(12)
Subject to the right of judicial review hereinafter provided, a determination made by an administrative law judge regarding a claim made pursuant to section 2025(c) of this title shall be final and shall take effect thirty days after the date of the delivery or service of final notice of such determination.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/2023

 

You made the claim. Back it up...

 

We have an appeals system that says otherwise...

 

I’m familiar with Art 3, specially where it says all cases and LAWS

 

"Trump Food-Stamp Cuts Blocked by Judge Who Cites Pandemic"

so who is the bad guy here? the one trying to cut food stamps during a pandemic or the guy stopping him from doing so?

 

Not sure, or at least not in terms of inflation....nor am I sure how that relates to my comment..

I believe some do donate, sure people that ID as conservative do more