No fraud: Georgia audit confirms authenticity of absentee ballots

That’s just made up BS.

Just like in Philly. “They kicked out the poll watchers”.........pssstttt...they had cameras in the rooms and they show the poll watchers there

 

Do you have a link for that? Don't see any reports.

 

No they do not, by the nature of the process, who voted cannot be traced back from a counted ballot.

Once separated that breaks any traceability to the source or the signature.

 

Already ordered by the georgia senate.
Pulitzer will do a fine job. He doesn't need me.

Descending into snark so quickly i see.
Take a deep breath, relax, it's gonna be OK punkin

 

Sorry, I meant a link for this.

 

Yes ceiling mounted cameras that lack the resolution to even see a signature nor less determine who signed it, but for the reason I already explained.

 

Ooops, non bar coded ballots used in dem districts, now confirmed.

Must be an honest oversight

 

BS. In my state they have a bar code to tie it to the envelope

 

BS. It was a live feed that was perfectly legible. And had multiple cameras with multiple angles.

I’m sure you still think the video of the suitcases shows fraud also right ? Those “counted in the middle of the night” ballots form that 12 minute video ?

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...ballots-using-method-outlined-jovan-pulitzer/

 

Thanks. I have to say that someone coming up with their own method of analysing ballots seems a little sketchy, but I guess we'll see. If he's an honest actor, then fine.

 

Not even one? That sounds suspicious don't ya think? There is fraud in everything.

 

They will simply move the goal posts or claim that whoever did this audit is deep state and a member of the conspiracy to defraud the election.
There is no winning an argument with conspiracy theorists.

 

False. Ballots are not easy to forge. Every state has unique features that make it difficult to replicate and these features can vary from state to state and include: special card stock, page size, thickness and coloring. You also have to ensure that these ballots can be read by the machines.

 

Well that didn't take long.

Find 1 fake ballots = widespread fraud

Not finding 1 fake ballot = widespread fraud because there is fraud in everything

So basically, the absence of evidence is evidence itself lol!!

 

Kinetic analysis will show differences in ink type, paper type, fold marks, roller marks from outgoing and incoming USPS sorters, depressions on paper from pressing with a pen, etc

 

A nice kinetic audit using Pulitzer's methods will distinguish lots of things

 

What's the point anymore? Once the audit shows the ballots are real, the goalposts will be moved yet again and Trump will claim real ballots were mixed in.

 

Relax its gonna be OK

 

I was curious how difficult it is to find information about him (eg no wikipedia), if he is eminent enough to perform such a ballot examination. I found this: http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5708 It's rather convoluted but it certainly doesn't inspire confidence. They seem to be saying he went to significant effort to create a misleading wikipedia page for himself.

 

I think you should demand a full forensic science analysis of all 150 million or so ballots, including fingerprints etc. Without that nobody should believe the election results.

 

Trumpers have been saying that the last 4 years, and now our country has never been in such a precarious position now that Trump let the country get hacked.

 

Those fingerprints on ballots were all faked. The dee pstate is always 2 steps ahead.

 

No, seriously, its gonna be OK.
Everything is legit.
The kinetic exam will show nothing.

 

I just did some checking and the bar code doesn't tie back to the voter, but to the address it was sent to.