the great replacement

They do not think their race is being replaced. Their argument is about alleged discrimination / racism. Planet earth black population is growing at a very fast pace, so they have nothing to worry from "replacement" POV.

They are mostly white. You mean they are winning it for whites.

 

Latinos think of themselves as a separate race:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Raza

And about half of White people think that their culture and values are disappearing:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ntry-will-weaken-american-culture/3217218002/

 

Humm, that I did not know. I'll have to research it.

 

There ARE people who despise them. As for it being "allowed", - there has never been as many deportations as there has been in past 1.5 yrs. They SHOULD create a laws similar to Title-42 (which is not a law), or even better if they come up with immigration reform.

 

Virtually no one cares about that now.

 

Why should a higher population result in a higher per capita murder rate? Democrats have pushed "defund police" and have reduced funding in a number of cities.

The problem is that it was pushed as "white supremacy" without mentioning that very few blacks are killed by white supremists. It just aggravates the distrust between races. Listening to the news reports, you would get the impression that this a frequent occurrence and it is not.

 

but a much higher number who came in illegally who stayed here.

 

A very good question. Here’s a pretty good article on the subject.

Democrats paying lip service to calls to defund the police do not mean they take any meaningful steps towards that goal. What do you think defund the police means?

What would be the point of pointing that out exactly? You would expect a story about a mass shooting, motivated by white supremacist rhetoric, to include a qualifier? “Hey, we know a white guy intentionally sought out and murdered a bunch of black people, but, like, did you know black people kill way more white people than the other way around?” Excuse the hyperbole, but are you serious‽

 

No one thinks they all are rapists and murderers. But you can bet that rapist and murderers are coming illegally across the southern border since they are not likely to make it in through legal means. Don't forget terrorists. Also, not all are Latino. Most good immigrants who are undocumented came here legally but then never left even though they had a temporary visa. Securing the border isn't even about them, either. It wouldn't even effect them. But keep spouting msm lies as if they are true.

 

List of Cities Defunding the Police | Surge in Crime (secureamericanow.org)

 

I have not seen any stats to back that up, but I have seen CBP stats on deportations, and we never deported as many as we are deporting now. You seem to disapprove, How come?

Yea. The claim includes that 'some' (presumably) are good people. The message is clear: most are rapists and murderers.

 

Just a quick question, are you going to keep ignoring parts of my posts that you don’t want to/can’t address? I just want to know if I should keep engaging with you on this subject.

Thanks in advance.

Edit: Oh look, a website with a clear agenda that doesn’t source any of its claims. Yawn*

 

You asked if I knew what defunding the police meant. I believe that cutting the funds to the police is what it means and a number of cities did it with bad results, as predicted.
At Least 13 Cities Are Defunding Their Police Departments (forbes.com)

 

You cut out one portion of my post and responded with a link. No quote including relevant contents. Really lazy.

Feels like you’re dodging my points to try to poke one aspect then duck my response to that and move on to something else. Makes the conversation pretty tiring.

Would you say you’re conceding points when you do that?

 

They listed numerous cities which had cut funding with disastrous results. What further quoting on my part is needed?

I prefer to pursue my own arguments rather than chasing you down your own rat holes.

 

Again, link was a clearly biased source with no citations. Not worth the time to fact check their claims.

All of my posts, including “rat holes” were direct responses to your posts. Sorry to hear you find so little value in your own argumentation.

Catch you in the next one.

 

I think I understand the OP
I THINK he's trying to say conservatives should be complaining more about their job impact and economic strain instead of them voting?
what's the difference? Mass illegal immigration is still having multiple negative impacts
who cares which one of those impacts which group is complaining about?

 

There were two links. You can google your own and you will get the same results.

 

My sincere desire is that in 500 years no one will care if there are black people or not......

I'm just trying that on for size so you can say it back to yourself and see if it sounds as racist as your version.

 

Can you go ahead and post one of those up for us to see it?

 

getting into an argument over whether or not it's true (it isn't) just validates the fears of people who can't acknowledge that they believe in black supremacy.

If you worried that there will be no black people in 500 years you are a bad person.


Now is the above sound racist to you or not?

 

People who promote "black supremacy" are so rare it's irrelevant.

 

There are probably far more racist blacks than there are whit

 

I find that hard to believe given the fact that only 14% of Americans are black, but you can accuse them of being more racist. What do I care?

What I said about "black supremacy" is true. Its so rare its a nonissue,

 

yes, because we don’t have Anyone buying into the Black Replacement theory. So you are being racist by using that as a hypothetical.

If black people actually subscribed to that theory, it would apply to them, but it’s just something you made up to defend white supremacists.

So yes, the fact that you brought that up does suggest you might be racist.