Red flags suggest police could have prevented Jan. 6, and that Capitol security remains lax

No trump BELIEVED they would need people.

However intelligence reports indicated there wouldn’t be any mass violence.

 

So he believed there would be problems needing more troops, but the experts weren’t aware of that?

Interesting …

 

Yeah super interesting how he suggested 10,000 national guard to be deployed to defend the place that you’re asserting he’s going to send his people to attack the next day. With the directives being “do whatever you have to do” in regards to defending the Capitol.

It completely obliterates the idea that he engaged in some planned violent coup. But you won’t see that at the little January 6 committee because it’s evidence not beneficial to their argument. Therefore it won’t be shared with the public. Because that’s what a banana republic running a kangaroo court does.

 

840 were charged with criminal acts 185 sentenced to jail time so far

FFS man, your WRONG. You keep regurgitating BS that you have been shown is not true. She does NT have the power to request the National Guard, nor is tshe in the chain of approval when they are requested

Why dont you show us in an official document who the capital board reports to, and also show us the overall approval process for the NG to be deployed to the capital grounds (i did that already and it showed that you are wrong). You made the claim, now show your work !

Wrong. But you go ahead and show us the official process in and official government read document

JFC, the j6 committee already did that.

 

Either he knew there was going to be trouble and still went ahead with his rally of lies, or he didn’t know, in which case there was no need to suggest more support.
Which is it?

Here’s my take on it.
He was expecting to fire up people at the rally. He hoped they would take physical action and storm Congress to stop the certification of the vote. He didn’t “offer” more security or instruct anyone to get more.
All he did was brag that the rally was going to be big and raucous. So big and raucous that it would need twice as much security as was planned. Not an offer. Not an instruction. Bragging from a lying blowhard.

 

Security remains lax because no one really thinks its a big deal they are just using it for political theater.

 

Out of 10,000's......................

She has the power to order the security at the Capital to issue the request to have them there, the people who make that request work for her.

Why doesn't Pelosi release all the information and hold hearings on it?

The official process and what actually happened has been posted over and over and over.

When did Pelosi and her staff testify and turn over their communication records to the Republican committee?

 

No that is political speech for "we're not touching it". We know all those who have been called leading up and the depositions that were given none that I know of by Pelosi or her staff.

If you have some information that she and her staff testified in deposition and turned over all their communications and are schedule to testify please let me see it. Although I am sure it would be pure partisan theater.

 

So you're a mind-reader. What number am I thinking of?
You might be proved right regarding the 2nd paragraph, I've no idea. I just wanted clarification on Pelosi being declared 'off-limits'. That clearly isn't true, except for mind-readers.

 

Yes, the numb nuts Schiff, Cheney will not show those videos, will they. But that is what the globalist deep state do, in both parties. They will only show one side that aligns with their propaganda. Schiff swore he had evidence that Trump colluded with Russia years ago, but he never had it, he lied. But still, the weak, cowardly republicans do nothing to him and he is running the hearing today.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/p...mail_uid=16861918-83fa-4afc-938e-1506020f1796

 

Really ? Thats where your hanging your hat ?

Even after the j6 commission has proven what the proud boys were doing ?

Your WRONG.

Show us where she has that power. Show us the proof that she has that power. I've already shown where she doesnt, but I eagerly await you posting the official document that shows that

What is she supposed to release ?

Yes, it has, and it CLEARLY states that the Capitol Board has the power, not the Speaker.

Why would she ? She has not power nor authority for anything releated to what happened on J6 ?

 

So who do you think the Stenger, the senate sergeant at arms, reports to? Pelosi or McConnell. I can;t find any testimony that the national guard was blocked by Pelosi before Jan 6 either.

 

The SAA reports to Pelosi. Pelosi could have ordered they have more security, she could have insured that the urgings of the White House, the DOJ, the FBI, HSA and her own Capitol Police be properly responded to and that security be in place. If she did not take any leadership in the matter she should be FIRED, her Speakership should be revoked she has no business being the top official.

Let's find out what role she took, what did she know and when, what any of her staff knew and said or reported. Why is OK to do that with Reps but not Dems who also had responsibilities here?

 

The Senate SAA reports to the senate majority leader. Pelosi is not in charge of day to day security, which is why there is a sergeant at arms who are supposed to handle these matters.

 

Just the facts

THEY WORK FOR HER.

All her communications and notes about meetings and discussion concerning the security concerns leading up to Jan 6 and those of her staff.

And who do they report to?

Because she is speaker of the House and the top official.

 

~ This will likely end up costing taxpayers millions of dollars in civil judgement settlements. Even liberal Alan Dershowitz has voiced concerns about the abuse and misuse of powers.

SAD ...