Gays should not be allowed to adopt >>>MOD ALERT<<<

It's time for people to just IGNORE those who so irrationally oppose homosexual people; they waste people's good time/energy. This world has REAL problems and issues that need attending.

 

Would you care to get an education before commenting further in this thread? Thank you.

 

He won't bother... he'll continue on as he has.

 

Bet you're proud to have all the morons laughing with you.

Why are you so compelled to fantasize about your intellectual superiors?

 

lol, please provide your evidence of the above claim. You've made some idiotic posts in the past, but this one is particularly idiotic.

 

It's destined that America will have a new stronger respected Leader and overall political standard.
And it will prevent and stop all and any Gay intervention.

The majority of people in America are of decent, normal mind. Many are changing their prespectives. They are fed-up with decline, and degragation of the human culture and family value.

Homosexuality is nothing more, than a insult to humanity.....And will be stopped.

FACT

 

Writing flaimbait posts in this ridiculous format does not contribute to the discussion.

FACT

 

Homosexuality has been part of the human condition since before recorded history.

Adoptive parents who are gay should be qualified just as heterosexual parents are qualified.

Check income, the home environment, background... character references.

Or would you prefer to have gay men fake it, marry women , have children and see other men on the side?

 

then how do you explain the FACT that the majority of americans now support same sex marriage?

 

Do you really believe that someone like Dixie is even remotely interested in facts?

 

This is Un-Holy terratory....Wicked.

 

What's wicked is your spelling!

 

Have you adopted any children? How about foster children?

 

Children should come first. Logic would assume that since genders are different physically, mentally and emotionally....that both genders have important attributes to offer while raising a child. Both genders should be included in the nurturing.

That is my rationale for not deeming homosexuality as equal in the raising of children.

In otherwords...though a traditional arrangement is considered beneficial---the decision should be up to the organization personally involved with the children.

 

Fact......

 

The part in bold all the way. And it's not just them. It's all the hardcore activist liberals that insist that gay adoption must be accepted because everyone "has the right" to yadda yadda yadda.....

Screw the kids. They are not even relevant here. Who cares what's good for them if it infringes on someone's "civil rights."

 

For your position to be rational one must assume that there is a willing two gendered couple willing, ready and able to adopt all the children available for adoption. Not only is that not the case it is far from the case. Take a look at any child welfare system in any state in our nation and you will find hundreds of children languishing and deemed virtually not adoptable for lack of adopters.

Considering your original assumption you must assume that is not appropriate for a single person to adopt regardless of gender and/or sexual orientation. Logically you must also assume that it is beneficial to remove children from a suddenly single parent due to death or divorce. Likewise the assumption must be that a Lesbian parent must always have her children taken away. It is only plausible to assume that you favor placing these children, suddenly bereft of a traditional families, with a nice oppositely gendered couple. Which brings us back to the original assumption.

Having gone through all that, am I and every other reader to assume that your last sentence was a Rosanna Rosannadana, "never mind."

 

What effects do you imagine arise from having two parents of the same sex?

As for selfish needs, maybe we should talk about the people who are so selfish that they would use their anti-gay prejudices to deny a stable, nurturing home to children who desperately need one. Never mind the many heterosexual couples who produce or adopt children to fulfill their selfish needs.

The plain fact is that there are children lingering in foster care until they 'age out' of the system. Not enough heterosexual couples willing to adopt.

What about same-sex couples who have children through artificial insemination or via surrogacy? Should they be denied the right to parent those children?

 

I guess I would like too see some study showing that homosexual parents will some how scar their children.

I doubt it exists, but I suppose the homophobes will instead insist, as a thin veil of their own bigotry, that the kids will be demented in some sort of way.

 

Yes, indeed.

 

I fully support looking to male/female couples first. But, only those couples who have been vetted properly and thoroughly.

After that, then single people who can raise the child(ren) should be given the opportunity.

I do however hope they examine the vetting process after what happened with the policeman who adopted boys so he could engage in gay sex with them. There is no way you can tell me that he was vetted. Or, if he was, then there is something wrong withion the system

 

I see that Dixie has been banned! Wunderbar!

 

Awesome. FACT.

 

Why would you want innocent children exposed to Dixie. There is quite enough ignorance and bigotry in the world without tainting impressionable minds. Prejudice and hate, unlike sexual orientation, are learned behaviors and passed from adults to children. In a perfect world Dixie and his gun-loving wife would not be allowed to rear children.

 

I would have to agree.