At this point, I'm predicting an easy Obama win

What a dream world of unreality you liberals wander around in. How to fix the economy? A low IQ goldfish could fix the economy. List all of odrama's policies, and do the opposite. And your incredibly incompetent idiot, clown, fool, has had the answer in his hand since December, 2010. From the commission he appointed. But their report clashes with his ideological illusions. so he has ignored a plan that would obviously WORK and would have Republican support. But it doesn't fundamentally change America into something its not, so odrama, the immature child whiner, in the White House, is not interested.

Read it, digest it. Actual functioning brains came up with this. Far different than the ideological wasteland that is the wholly confused and incapable odrama's 'brain.'

http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/sit...files/documents/TheMomentofTruth12_1_2010.pdf

Remember, this is odrama's commission, even though the report reads like Republicans wrote it.

 

President Obama will easily win the 2012 election. The GOP candidtaes consist of:

Sarah Palin - crazy woman with permanent PMS who can even control her promiscuous children.

Christine O'Donnell - claim to fame is her denial of being a witch - many Conseravtives thought she was and her confession was popular with them.

Rick Perry - religious fanatic who denies evolution and is personnally responsible for the killing, by the state, of over 100 men by strapping them to a table and injecting poison into their body.

Mitt Romney - another crazy who happens to be a Mormon (a sect that believe in the most outrageous things such as: When we die, our spirits are separated from our bodies and if we were good we go to “spirit paradise.” If we were bad we go to “spirit prison.” The spirit world exists as a place for spirits to go while awaiting the second coming.

Herman Cain - the "token" guy is a pizza king, never elected to anything, but the can calim "We are not racists, we are inclusive."

Michel Bachmann - another crazy woman with permanent PMS, she's a right-wing, loonie tunes religious zealot, and she's married to a bigotted, anti-homosexual.

The above are only some of the crazy and colourful candiadtes that President Obama must deal with. He will be re-elected because fortunately the majority of Americans still can think for themselves and will vote DEMOCRAT.

I'm quite certain that when the 2012 election is over the US political landscape will be littered with conservative 'exploded-heads'.

 

That's a big part of it; the right doesn't understand how crazy the people they're trying to push really are. They've gone mad. This is a list of crazy people, not potential presidents. The worst part (for them not for the nation) is that if they don't run one of the whack jobs they risk splitting the party (reps and tea). This is why I'm predicting such an easy win for Obama. As if the republicans are (*)(*)(*)(*)ed if they do, (*)(*)(*)(*)ed if they don't with their front runners.

 

As long as Obama is the dems candidate, republicans could run Lassie and win.

On a serious note...want to fix the economy? Get the government out of it. First announce a 5 year freeze on any new regulations. Then announce a regulatory review to examine all existing regulations starting with the most expensive with the goal of eliminating or simplifying as many as possible over those 5 years.

Imagine 5 years without the government helping business!

 

Lassie wouldn't remind people of Bush so yeah, might stand a chance.

The last part of what you said I agree with very much. The problem is neither a republican nor a democrat in the presidency is going to change that. The nation would need to vote for someone else entirely, but I doubt a third party will win.

 

The problem with our regulatory system is that it is self sustaining and self growing. It is always writing regulations...that is what it does. Imagine if your job was to write procedures for the operation of your home. Every day you sit down and for 8 hours write procedures and rules. 5 days a week, forever...

After a very short while the procedures for using toilet paper correctly and operating light fixtures would appear. A bit later we would have step by step showering instructions and soap size, shape and consistency requirements...

It would get worse every day but you cannot stop because that is where your income comes from...As the regulations get more intrusive the operation of the home slows to a standstill and still the regulating writing continues...

Now imagine your household regulations come with penalties. Use the soap incorrectly and one is fined, wax the floor too often of against the grain and one get an allowance cut or time out...

Eventually the regulation writer begins to expand his rule making outside the home. After all, the soap and toilet paper comes from somewhere and that also need regulation....

When a real need to protect society is noted and a law is passed addressing the problem, no one stops to think what happens when the problem is relieved. Do the rule writers and regulators go away? No, they are still writing, still regulating. The problem is the rules and regulations become increasing silly, self serving or venal.

 

"It's the economy stupid".........James Carville

And his speeches are not great anymore, they are insufferable.

 

My Fing,

You are absolutely dead-on my son, dead-on. Conservatives (**********s, GOP, Libertarians, the crazies of society) only support wackos. Heck all you have to do is be rich, deny evolution, promise the voodo economic principle of reducing the deficit by reducing taxes and they have collective orgasms.

Palin gets on stage and shreaks her crazy lunatic ideas and they have a collective erection - Palin is Conservative Viagra.

 

These brilliant deductions brought to you by a person that is not an American.

Lies about serving in Vietnam.

Accuses Perry of avoiding Vietnam while Perry serves as a pilot in the USAF during the Vietnam era. Had Yukon EVER been in the service, she would know that Perry's risk of serving in Vietnam was equal to anyone in the service at that time.

This is the same brilliant poster that chastises Marco Rubio and Sean Hannity for not serving in Vietnam but ignores the fact that odrama never served either.

However for all the things I don't like about odrama, not serving in Vietnam is not one of them since odrama would have been a pre-teen then as would Hannity and Rubio would have been an infant.

If one is seeking a completely nonsensical rant that goes nowhere and says nothing, This is the poster to follow.

 

Fr. Yukon's reposnes are in bold type. In addition I consider the overall post made by Dan to be highly offensive.

 

These brilliant deductions brought to you by a person that is not an American.
CORRECT. I AM CANADIAN, THANK GOD.
And you are either misinformed about the USA or you enjoy lying.

Lies about serving in Vietnam.
NO LIE. I JOINED THE US ARMY VOLUNTARILY AND SERVED IN VIETNAM, I WAS YOUNG, IDEALISTIC, AND STUPID.
I believe that you are no longer idealistic.

And since you post things that are contrary to the way the US military conducts itself, I don't believe you ever served anywhere.

Accuses Perry of avoiding Vietnam while Perry serves as a pilot in the USAF during the Vietnam era. Had Yukon EVER been in the service, she would know that Perry's risk of serving in Vietnam was equal to anyone in the service at that time.
HE EVADED VIETNAM AS DID MILLIONS OF OTHERS DURING THE 14 YEAR PERIOD OF THE WAR. HE WAS AND IS A COWARD IN MY OPINION.

This is typical of the posts that reveal that you have NO experience of how the US military conducts its business. Perry was an active duty Officer pilot during the Vietnam war. At any moment he could have been reassigned from Europe to Vietnam. That is not "evading." If one part of a post is a PROVABLE lie, why should any part of your post be considered to have ANY validity?

This is the same brilliant poster that chastises Marco Rubio and Sean Hannity for not serving in Vietnam but ignores the fact that odrama never served either. However for all the things I don't like about odrama, not serving in Vietnam is not one of them since odrama would have been a pre-teen then as would Hannity and Rubio would have been an infant.
DOES IT BOTHER YOU, LIKE IT DOES OTHER **********S, THAT THE US MILITARY COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF IS HALF NEGRO ?

More typical ignorance by weak brained idiotic liberals. When you have nothing else, accuse your opponent of being a RACIST. I spit in your face, this ignorant question is totally undeserving of an answer.

If one is seeking a completely nonsensical rant that goes nowhere and says nothing, This is the poster to follow.
COMING FROM YOU I CONSIDER THAT TO BE AN COMPLIMENT, THANK YOU MY SON.

I am not your son, and I AM a Vietnam veteran. I was there, twice, YEARS before you claim to have been there.

And I consider every word of every one of your posts to be fabrications done without any real knowledge.

 

Dan,

Pray tell my son, but what do you know about war, about killing and fear? Do you know anything other than what you see watching Rambo movies? I think not.

It is puzzling that someone like you, who seems to be such an ardent supporter of military actions, is not in the military saving the country from those "crazy fundamentalist Muslims". Why is that Dan, why are you not serving your great country....could it be that you simply talk a good war?

 

Still waiting for you to explain how someone who was inoculated from going to Vietnam by conscription evaded doing so by joining the active duty military where he was just as much subject to a duty there as anyone else in the military.

 

In case anyone didn't already know that "Father" Yukon was totally full of it, I offer the following two quotes,

 

Stick it where the sun don't shine you phoney little child. You wouldn't make it in the Brownies, let alone any actual military outfit.

And why Am I not fighting muslims? Because I did my time and I'm now in my 70's "sonny." Ever heard of MAAG?

You are a legend in you own mind and a completely imaginary person. The fact that you cannot keep your lies straight proves that to one and all.

Adios dumb ass.

 

New York Special Election goes REPUBLICAN.

The traditionally Democrat seat formerly held by "Tony and his Baloney," Weiner, has gone to the Republicans. Voter registration in the district is 3 to 1 in favor of Democrats but they LOST. Schumer [D] held this seat before Weiner.
This is 2012, the sneak preview.

 

Just for fun, have a look and see what your boy Kucinich (who I greatly respect by the way) has to say about Republican candidate Ron Paul

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py8cXlLyX18"]Dennis Kucinich asked about Ron Paul on Free Minds TV - YouTube[/ame]

 

I think the only candidate who could even have a possibility of giving Obama a run for his money would be Romney, but due to the groundswell support of the very conservative Perry at this point, I'm not sure if Romney can garner enough support to win the nomination. If that's the case and Perry is the candidate then I believe that Obama will be a shoo-in hands down.

 

I think every person on the platform last night could give him a run and I can think of LOTS more.

A sampling of this mornings headlines:

Obama Approval Plummets on Jobs Plan: Poll

Number of poor hit record 46 million in 2010

22 percent of American children lived in poverty last year

Decline in U.S. Income Raises Stakes in 2012 Presidential Race

 

Don't overlook the other election last night...

http://www.thestatecolumn.com/artic...tion-results-mark-amodei-beats-kate-marshall/

 

Unfortunately, Dems are discouraged from voting. They had control of everything and failed to get any real meaningful progressive legislation passed. They failed their voters and now the voters are not turning out for them in these "little" elections. The same thing happened in the last election cycle. It's not really like people are turning Republican all of a sudden, it's just that Dems are not showing up to vote and personally I don't blame them. But if you think that the Repubs are any different, just give it some time and the country will swing back the other way. Just the game they've created for us to participate in. Until we have another party emerge, will continue on this political seesaw where the American people always lose and big money always win.

 

How do the American people always lose? Our standard of living is terrific. Not the Utopia that democrats dream of that will NEVER exist, but still terrific. Our poorest live like nobility compared to the poor around the world. One party rule, no matter if Republicans or Democrats control Congress and the White House, is always a danger. When the Republicans held total control up to FY2008, we thought they were doing a lousy job because they were. But once Democrats took control, they made it look like the Republicans did a terrific job. When one party is so bad it makes the others bad job look OK, they must go!
I'd rather we had split control. But in 2012 The WH has to change. not because its Democrat or ultra liberal, but because odrama is so completely inept he is an embarrassment to the history of this nation. So I'd like to see the House remain Republican and the Senate remain Democrat with a new resident in the WH. But the Dems have done so awful, the Republicans will again take control of all 3. Then we can only hope they have learned something from the decades of damage done by liberal Utopian nonsense and Political Correctness.

 

A right wing mouthpiece speaks once again. Live like nobility? LOL. Hilarious. I've spent a lot of time in Trinidad. I would never consider our poor that much of a step up from theirs. But, you want to compare our poor to 3rd world poor? Good on you. Can we now compare our military to 3rd world military? Our parks to 3rd world parks? Streets? Libraries? Education? There is a reason we are not a 3rd world country. Our poor should reflect us being the richest country in the world. Do you think its ok for poor people to not have running water, refridgerators, A/C? Probably not. They should be happy to have running water, right?

So the Dems had control of all 3 for 2 years. And you begin your rant by saying that one party rule is a danger but then you conclude with being hopeful that Republicans will again take control of all 3? Get a clue dude. Anway, while I don't think the Dems have done a good job, I'm not so partisan that I fail to see the Republicans in Congress comprimised on nothing. I'm not so partisan to realize that the Bush years weren't so grand themselves.

 

You are funny, akphidelt.

You need to read the latest headlines!

Check this out!

Disasterous night for Democrats - they lose BOTH special elections!

The Democrats got a boot in their ass because its the American way! LMAO!!

This will be a night Democrats do not want to remember. Two special elections and Democrats LOST both of them. First Democrats got humiliated in a heavily Democrat district, where Republican Bob Turner defeated the Democrat for Anthony Weiner's seat.

Now, in Nevada, the Republicans won that special election House seat in a landslide!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...cial-election/