Present arguments for your trust in science, without using your scientific texts...

And that is probably the only reason that you engaged this 'rubbish' thread is because you saw it (perceived it) as something that you were accustomed to.

So as seen below, you continue on with your prattle, still not KNOWING enough to abide by the OP. Your display of a high level of intelligence at its peak performance,,, and still not addressing the OP and or attempting to meet the requirements of the OP. So sad.

There (at the emphasized text above) is evidence that you are so careless or so emotionally charged that you cannot even spell correctly.

BTW: the opposing thread with a similar title is still reading only 55 posts ( http://www.politicalforum.com/relig...your-faith-without-using-your-holy-texts.html ) and this one is now over 200. Must be a lot of 'rubbish' in this one to sort out.

 

I see you had absolutely nothing to say on this:

Not only does this address the title of you silly thread, but it shows you have nothing. Attacking spelling mistakes is a sure fire sign that someone has no arguments left. Instead of attacking the post, they attack a short coming of a person.

G'day to ya Incorporeal. May you live happily in your fantasy land.

 

Actual evidence of what? Now I have said something about 'this'.

Like you have never engaged in such activity? Hmmm. Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. You see, by calling my thread a 'rubbish' thread, you made the first attack... and I know from your previous postings and the things that you complain about in those previous postings, that you are not without sin. I merely reciprocated in the pleasure that you initiated.

Leaving the field of battle ? Acquiescing to the fact that you cannot abide by the requirements of the OP?

 

simplestine logic is not used to explore simple concepts when the concepts are more complex than what can be described in simple terms.

If one was to do just that it would be vague and insignificant.

Hence, the answer to your question.

 

How is that an answer to the question? You use a non-existing (newly fabricated by you with no meaning) word and expect someone to accept your view as an answer to the question? Wow!

 

Just because you have difficulty understanding cognitiv functioning, does not mean the concepts exist like religion.

 

And it is also obvious that you don't even know the English language. Else you think that you can make up things and expect everyone to accept them as being factual when they have no basis... "simplestine"? Get real.

 

Oh yes it is real, just as religion and science are with no evidence.

 

'Religion' and 'science' are with no evidence??? Wow.

 

That's what this OP is wanting a discussion with no scientific facts. LOL...

 

Well bravo... keep up the good work. But present an argument based on no scientific facts.

 

OK;

Why did god and/or jeasus make Tim Teblow embarass him self for the past 3 games.

My aregunemt is Tim does not have the skills needed to be a NFL QB.

PS: let the snow ball effect take place and twist it into all kinds of extreme stuff.

 

Good question CT. Since you are a 'god', why did you do that?

 

I'm not the Teblow god, it is another one that may have did it.

 

Well, because you are a 'god' why don't you just make inquiry with one or all of those other 'gods' and get the answer for all of us?

 

I don't think Incorporeal is aware of all the nothing he says.

 

You aren't limiting just scientific facts, you're purposely limiting what people can and cannot say which makes it incredibly hard to substantiate anything at all. It would be JUST as impossible for you to justify your beliefs without referencing the Bible. It would be JUST as impossible for somebody to back up historical claims without referencing history books.

 

Soil is a sort of superorganism, connected through root systems (both plant and fungal), invertebrates, and microbes. Its the microbes especially that are fascinating, how incredibly tiny this form of life is, yet how widespread as well. The soil under your feet in New York, lets say, is connected to the soil in California through this system. You could even isolate parts of it as a whole. A single colony of mushroom in Oregon has been estimated at covering over 2,000 acres.

 

No, I can not fulfill a completely irrational, illogical and pointless requestwith a post.

I would have to do that in person so I could demonstrate information for you.

 

You are the only person saying what I believe. I only told you what I did not believe. I don't believe in god because of a lack of evidence.

Technically, I don't believe it is impossible that a god can exist, I have just never seen or heard of any evidence that would suggest it.

Do you know what null means?

What do you think I have faith in?

Which of my beliefs would you like evidence for?

 

But that isn't the soil itself, that's already organisms living in the soil.

 

Thats why I used the term superorganism, because it is the small, innumerable organisms within the soil, and how these organisms interact, that makes it a "living soil."

 

So, OP don't you trust in science?

Then what the heck are you doing using computers? I hope that when you're ill don't you go to the doctor. And I hope also that you don't use cars, mobile,... Anything. Because all these things are science.

 

Have you not read this entire thread? If not go back a few pages and learn a little bit about me and my experience with science. Educate yourself before creating straw arguments.

Really? Are those things 'science' And here, this whole time, I was thinking that those things you named were the product of the proper use of science. But really are they (the things you mentioned) "science"? Learn the Queens English.

 

You are both wrong again Ozy.... The OP disallows the use of scientific data in this discussion (thread) Microbes and organisms are both specialized scientific terms. Please abide by the requirements of the OP.