Should conservatives call liberals racist because of affirmative action?

Hell yes. AA is the govt-mandated persecution of white people and the biggest hate crime in history. Conservatives should go on the offense and fight the charge of racism by pointing out that their critics are the racists.

Conservatives are a bunch of cowards for not doing that.

 

Yes.....but they should wait till America's First Affirmative Action President has left office.....
.
.
.
.

 

The issue is cut and dried. AA is as wrong as anything can be and it's everywhere and yet no politician will attack it!!! America owes a debt to anti-racists like me who talk about AA on the internet.

 

I suppose a strong case could be made for that..

 

Affirmative Action IS racist, after all...

 

No. Conservatives should not call liberals racist because of affirmative action. They should call them racist because of the long history of racism in the democrat party. I have two threads, one which documents the republicans true record of accomplishments on race, the other documents the democrats long history of racism. Here they are, you should read them, comment on them or add stuff that you find that I have missed:
http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/28342-gops-record-race.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/222393-democratic-partys-record-race.html

 

Affirmative Action is incredibly racist and incredibly stupid.

It's off-shoot programs and its culture of racism is horrible and crippling America's already stunning research facilities.

 

So is slavery, but it happened anyway. Made the white man rich.

 

Biggest hate crime ever¿ this remark is as insulting as it is ignorant..

 

White women profit the most from it. Who suffers the most? Asians. Stop complaining. You have nothing to complain about. Even if you take in that rightwingfraud guy's argument.

Asians never enslaved the blacks. White people profit from it, black people profit from it. Asians suffer. Messed up.

 

No, it is not a hate crime. A hate crime by definition means you do something physically harming to someone due to the color of their skin, sexual preference, or religious beliefs. Because of your blatant disregard of literacy and intelligent thought there is no more reason to respond to you. Ever.

/END THREAD

 

Or verbal. Or discriminate as the OP describes.

 

You can call liberals liberal and racists racist. If a liberal is racist you can call them racist. If a liberal isn't racist you shouldn't. Not all liberals are in favour of affirmative action after all.

Of course, you could recognise the laughable irony of condemning racism while attacking a huge group of individuals on the basis of a single characteristic and start treating human beings as individuals instead.

 

Made the black man rich too. Whites didn't capture slaves in africa. They bought them from other black tribes who had caught them.

 

Where did you get that silly idea.? You don't have to physically harm someone. Hanging nooses is considered a hate crime by most people.

 

The board notes you have no argument and are reduced to calling other posters ignorant.

 

Conservatives need to go on the offensive more often period. It's good that we're typically slow to anger and we can sit back and let petty people run their mouths without needing to retaliate, but we're long past the point of needing to stand up and defend ourselves. The reason we are losing so much ground in the political war is because liberals are the ones taking all the shots. And by their verbal attacks, they have steadily transformed public opinion of our ideas into something they are not. But because the public is so used to only hearing things from the liberal attack point of view, it's how their brains perceive everything now. It is time for us to ignore every charge liberals throw at us and go on the full offensive pointing out every flaw, every piece of hypocrisy, and every ounce of stupidity and evil in their behavior with relentless force. Push them back on their heels and do not let up. Get the public used to hearing things from the other side for a change, from our side. We have the benefit of having the truth on our side. So it shouldn't be that hard.

It's time to stand up to the bullies. They've pushed us around for long enough.

 

Unless all white women are liberals how could they do that.

 

The President is black so he went to Harvard Law School.

I am white so I went to Loyola Law School, which is a good school but not Harvard.

In second year, all the summer clerkships at big law firms went to women and minorities.

Since I am a white male, I worked at a small P.I. firm during the summer.

There were no jobs for my white male self when I graduated.

I started an immigration practice and hired myself as my only employee.

 

I got it from reading books. This is an actual definition as defined in law what a hate crime is:

So therefore, your entire ridiculous post is null and void. I personally however, believe that when someone is going to interview another that they should not have to put race, and hire this person based on qualifications on their resume.

 

And I suppose you actually have evidence to back this outlandish claim?

 

It's a soft racism.


_

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm guessing your favorite movie is "Return of the Nerds"!

 

Really give us a list of all the white law firms that give the summer internships to black folks and not white folks.

Sorry, but I smell a rat.

 

Who is the racism actually against, is the question.