Those comments do not appear to be related to the study mentioned by you source the National Post. National Post... The consortium scrutinized...
Where have I defended Obamacare? The failure to understand simple concepts seems to be your and the other (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags problem. I...
Nope, still don't know what the hell you are talking about.
I don't what you are talking about. It seems like some cryptic (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bag post. But, whatever.
Again, single payer will not stop the payer from making decisions based on economic considerations. Doctors and patients are fully capable of...
Mentally deranged humans are not simply allowed to kill or initiate force against other PERSONS without restriction. We may not treat them as...
Well, some people are vegetarians because they simply think it is healthier. I think the author of the OP was simply trying to attack NAP, not...
No, that just creates new problems. A panel of the best doctors and medical researchers would be extremely expensive. The resources used for...
No, of course, not. Would you allow them to kill other humans? Humans are not non human animals. There is a very clear and unambiguous...
You still have failed to provide a reason for why we should not eat meat. Non human animals are not persons, which is typically defined as a...
I reached that conclusion because you did not argue that all aggression by non human animals should be prohibited. The NAP does not say, that we...
That seems reasonable. :)
Your answer then is that we shouldn't apply the NAP to animals. I won't bother addressing the crazy of trying to interfere in the natural ecology...
Strawman. I have already made this clear. It's not science that is scary to me. It's the idea that the government will interfere with the...
#303 was the latest, but there have been more. You have not answered the problems inherent in trying to apply NAP to animals. Again, what are we...
You go on about fallacies imagining you have refuted the arguments of others by pointing them out, but this entire thread is nothing but a...
Your argument has BEEN invalidated. You are not actually applying NAP to animals. You are simply trying to force others to abide by your dietary...
The insurers don't interfere with the science or consideration of acceptable risks to the patient. There primary concern is cost control....
It's not really about it's impact on other humans or animals. You want some sort of validation for your dietary preferences and your...
No, you don't. Should we arrest a cat when it initiates force against a mouse, rat or a bird? Unless you answer yes, then you are not applying...
You think the metric system is just like ending slavery? If you don't want to eat meat then don't. It is juvenile and narcissistic to...
NAP does not apply to non human animals. Your argument is absurd and your protein deprived brain can offer nothing more than cliched ad hominems.
My point stands. Sab was arguing that it's okay to eat plants because they don't experience pain in the same way that animals do. But that is...
You need a citation to show that dogs have different sensory experiences than we do? I did not say they don't feel pain or even less, simply...
Your point was that the government would not limit care based on cost, but only on science. That is wrong. It's actually sort of frightening to...
Separate names with a comma.
