“Just move to Iceland if you don’t like diversity, bigot!”

Like I said Crank, you are giving the textbook definitions and I know those.

You can look at any nation with a demographical race of over 90% and see similarities between the nations.

To say that race plays no part in that is misguided.

And I would disagree that culture is not an essential part of the individual, strongly disagree actually.

It often defines who we are as individuals.

 

Only in the same way that religions are eventually associated with race/place. Both are simply habits of behaviour, nothing more. Entirely changeable, by choice, by anyone.

 

When the term was coined in europe it was used only to target the jews. European had only limited contact with the arabs but they've been hating the jews for centuries in europe.

 

I hope you are correct.

 

Correlation is not causation! We know that the appearance is of a connection, but there is literally NONE. Look at the science. It's no more a connection than that of a majority of white people being Christian, or a majority of Arab people being Muslim or Jewish. If you still doubt just how unrelated race and culture are in fact (not in appearance), check out the growth of Christianity and Western culture in China. Then go spend some time in an Ashram in India and watch the white folk living as and with locals .. even down to clothing.

 

Others have different ideas.

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20140410-can-we-drive-our-own-evolution

 

I would disagree. Shortly after WWII Germany, Belgium, and France got together and formed an alliance. It is this alliance, along with the Netherlands that is the power behind the EU. It came from all sides. Seeing that they had spent the last several centuries warring against each other, killing each other's people and destroying their towns, they agreed to instead, to pool their resources, and work for the betterment of all the people.

In that was the idea of downplaying the idea of nationality. To say all were the same. It was the logical extension of these ideas, that has welcomed those that perhaps shouldn't be welcomed.

 

They're wrong. Culture is a BEHAVIOUR, there is nothing innate about it. Raise a Korean kid in a white American household from birth, and he/she will have an entirely white American culture. And vice versa, naturally. I've seen black Japanese people (they're rare, but they exist) who are so Japanese that they freak out when they encounter westerners.

 

Define "white culture" please? I know about national culture, regional culture but a culture based on skin color? My culture is french-canadian/catholic, which is different than german culture or british culture, yet we're all white skinned. Hell, I live 15 minutes from the US border and still consider my culture different than the US culture.

 

Well except for the fact that the majority of white nations are Christian and the majority of arab nations are muslim.

You seem to be missing that part.

 

You have to think larger.

What are some things most white cultures have in common that non-white cultures do not?

 

And yet, france has a different culture than germany. Heck, northern france has a different culture than souther france. Even worst, normandy region in france have cultural difference than the loire region even though they're both northern regions.

There's no absolute when it comes to humans.

 

Nothing really. List those things that are exclusive to white please.

 

I am not quite sure why the emergence of the EU is a demonstration that Europeans have not lost their faith and sense of legitimacy.

Cheese, for one.

 

Cheese is a cultural thing to you? Poor you!

 

I am not quite sure why the emergence of the EU is a demonstration that Europeans have not lost their faith and sense of legitimacy.

 

Cuisine is certainly a cultural thing. Different cultures have different food. The Korean kid of your example doesn't eat cheeseburgers.

 

I never said they were exclusive, you have to look at things that seem to be most common among cultures.

I've already brought up immigration.

Why is it the majority of immigrants are choosing to flee to white cultures instead of others?

 

You've got me mixed up. I never mentionned a korean kid.

And cheese isn't a white thing either. Persian and the 'stans have been producing goat cheese for eons.

 

In the case of Japan, yes they are.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/japan-needs-foreigner-blood-like-naomi-osakas

Mr. Adelstein, like the rabbi in the OP, believes that a homogenous country like Japan needs more diversity or it will not survive. This is similar to what Barbara Spectre said about Europe, that without a multicultural transformation, Europe was not going to survive. It’s almost like there’s something connecting all 3 of them. They somehow all came to this same conclusion.

 

L

There is a racial difference. Normandy roughly translated means "land of the men from the north." It was ceded to Viking invaders by the French King. The prople from Normandy are more Scandinavian and the people from Loire who are more French.

 

Thanks for confirming your anti-white bias.

 

Mostly economic reason as the white destabilized and exploit others of their ressources for quite a while. But they're also other reason like lower birthrate in "white" nation, which make any influx of foreigners more apparent. Geography is another thing to consider. It's easier to go from Africa to europe than to China or America.

In short, whites should spend less time on forums and instead start making babies.

 

Thanks, I'll take that as a compliment coming from you!

 

Have you ever asked for someone to define what black culture was? Or are whites the only one without a culture?