THAT was your answer? Oh. Okay. So since the official story isn't 100% airtight then, what are some of its deficiencies in your opinion?
Point to any part of the official story that isn't 'airtight' in your opinion,first,then replace it with a more plausible scenario.
That's easy. Please check the height of the aircraft and compare with the hole. Then explain where the wings. tail and engines went to. I suspect Harry Potter, but that's just my tin foil hat slipping. I suppose it might have been a missile strike but the pictures of the aircraft hitting the building discount that possibility. Oh, sorry, all the cameras had stopped working at the very moment the aircraft hit. Bugger.
Actually, the question is, given the obvious evidence, why would anyone not question the official version?
Height of hole 16'. Height of fuselage which would be what makes the hole. What you say must be magic, normal, sane folk call a high speed crash. It always amazes me that truthers believe the wings and engines should remain intact after hitting a solid object at 500+ mph. There are numerous reasons why it could not have been a missile. The most telling is the damage inside the Pentagon. A missile cannot explode on impact, cause massive damage over a wide area and penetrate that far in. Ah. Another truther believing there had to be a bazillion cameras all looking up out at the sky. So what are you trying to prove here other than you are clueless as to what you are presenting? A hole where they've widened it in order to get at the debris and damage? What does that prove other than your dishonesty at presenting a picture you pretend know when it was taken and what it represents?
this has been explained to you,ad nauseam fred,your conclusions are skewed,because you're reading evidence that wasn't there NO 'missile' was seen,and cameras didn't 'stop' working
Yep, it sure was. And these are the headlines. Evidence piles up that Bush administration got many pre-9/11 warnings Foreign business in Iraq quadruples in 2011 As Exxon Mobil Weighs Oil Bid, Afghans Move Closer to a Foreign Investment Goal A NATION CHALLENGED: WASHINGTON; Bush's Advisers Split on Scope Of Retaliation Where was the evidence that substantiated your claims that 9/11 was an inside job again? And exactly how does any of that prove that the US Government was involved? Did you ever decide if airplanes hit the towers or was it video fakery? I have linked you to MOUNTAINS of evidence about the events of that day but you insist on finding obscure references in documents like PNAC and Clean Break that in your mind point to motivation. Motivation without evidence linking the guilty parties to the events is pretty useless. The fact that someone benefited from something does not prove that they were behind it. Construction companies benefit from the rebuilding that takes place after hurricanes and floods. Does this prove in your mind that hurricanes and floods are being caused by greedy construction companies?
You first. Remember,I have nothing to prove here,all the proof is in,you need to show where the 'holes' are
WTF? What kind of game is this? You're really not going to answer the question I asked you? And now you're playing this? WTH?
Allright,just so you don't have a conniption fit,I'll answer first. I find no flaws of any consequence in the official story.
I don't apreciate being called a liar,so point to any post where I said 'I don't think the official story is 100% airtight'
Ahhh, the blatant dishonesty of truthers. The official story is 100% air tight. It was done by 19 hijackers from Al Qaeda. There is zero chance of anything else because there is absolutely ZERO evidence anyone else is responsible. Now, might there be things we're not aware of? Absolutely. There is a classified version of the 9-11 commission report. Does it claim anyone else is involved? No. We would see indictments and further investigations plus an announcement of who was involved. Where truthers are dishonest is when they try and pretend any question at all about the "official story" means every theory is viable. It doesn't. But hey. I can't blame truthers. Everyone needs a sense of validation every once in a while, and let's face it.... truthers have gone so long without validation that they are willing to lie about the truth in order to have a sense of validation... even if it is also a lie.
Why should anyone answer your questions? You blatantly ignore the answers and move on to other silly questions you will ignore the answers to. The entire time you refuse to even acknowledge the majority of questions asked to you. Why? Because you know answering the question will simply expose the lies of your theories. Better to move on and hope everyone didn't notice than answer and have to acknowledge you are once again wrong.
You didn't have to literally say the above to say the above, but you did admit to it through my round of questioning on Page 4 and your posts on this page. If you're trying to deny that you didn't say, or at the very least infer that the official story is not 100% airtight, then you are, again, lying.
How about addressing the fact the official story can be 100% air tight without knowing all the facts? Do you think any of those facts that may or may not exist completely disprove every last element of the official story as truthers would have everyone to believe? Of course not. Once again, don't confuse admission we might not know all the facts with pretending there is still some possibility truthtard theories might actually be in some way true.
YOu have a knack for drawing inconclusive presumptions. Just because there is no evidence released to the public does not mean evidence never existed. Sweepers come in and the floors are spotless and people like yourself toot your horn as if it were fact when its nothing more than creative fiction because like so many you dont know the difference and eventual the fiction becomes you fact. Just because you are a suck dont expect everyone else to join you. Jumping up and down claiming the same gubafia that open their mouths and tell even one thing truthful puts out a report and you grovel at their feet. It has never been conclusively shown much less proven within any sane reasonable doubt that any one of them actually did the deed but troughers of course only need proof when its NOT the gubafia's tune
This coming from the kind of inconclusive presumptions is just HYSTERICAL! Tell us again how the government put in CGI images in real time of the planes on every private camcorder that recorded a plane hitting the South tower. I still laugh every time I think of you actually believing you could post that bull(*)(*)(*)(*) with a straight face and expecting people to actually BELIEVE you. BWAAAHAHAHAHA!!! Keep it up! Yes. We know. Truthers such as yourself routinely dismiss all kinds of evidence that was never "released to the public" because it was never in government control. The rest of your post is just more of the same nonsense we can always expect from you. Good job in never disappointing!
