17 women have accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct. It’s time to revisit those stories

https://qz.com/1130324/17-women-hav...misconduct-its-time-to-revisit-those-stories/

Something else that should be noted is that the language used during the discussions of Trump's misconduct were phrases like "groping," "fondling," or "inappropriate touching." But let's be clear, that conduct was sexual misconduct, sexual assault, and rape.



Those women also have names and here they are:

The 17 named accusers
1) Jessica Leeds (Non-consensual touching)
2) Ivana Trump (Non-consensual intercourse)
3) Kristin Anderson (Non-consensual touching)
4) Jill Harth (Non-consensual touching)
5) Cathy Heller (Non-consensual touching)
6) Temple Taggart McDowell (Non-consensual kissing)
7) Mariah Billado (Voyeurism)
8 ) Karena Virginia (Non-consensual touching)
9) Bridget Sullivan (Voyuerism)
10) Tasha Dixon (Voyuerism)
11) Mindy McGillivray (Non-consensual touching)
12) Rachel Cooks (Non-consensual touching and kissing)
13) Natasha Stoynoff (Non-consensual touching and kissing)
14) Jessica Drake (Non-consensual kissing)
15) Ninni Laaksonen (Non-consensual touching)
16) Summer Zervos (Non-consensual touching and kissing)
17) Cassandra Searles (Non-consensual touching)

And, for good, measure, here is the tape of Trump admitting and bragging about his willingness to engage in sexual assault:

 

Crickets from the Right ...

 

Don't forget ... we probably should interview his daughter ...

No telling what he's don't to her.

 

Hey now, that's your president

 

Your President is a serial sexual assaulter.

 

How do you reconcile the case of Jill Harth?? She later considered Trump her "boyfriend", and she did make-up work for him as late as 2013. That's not rational behavior by someone who was truly assaulted.

And that's what makes evaluating accusations against Trump so difficult.

 

Trump is filth. This was known to every thinking human 20+ years ago.

Hitlary was worse.

 

Any photos of him grabbing their breasts??

 

I would let her speak for herself on that front.

Jill Harth

Jill Harth said she met Trump in 1992 when she was dating one of his business associates, George Houraney. In a 1997 lawsuit (later dropped), Harth said Trump made comments or advances that left her feeling uncomfortable, and ultimately assaulted her. “Trump repeatedly put his hands on plaintiff’s thighs and violated plaintiff’s ‘physical and mental integrity’ by attempting to touch plaintiff’s intimate private parts,” the complaint reads.

The suit alleges a series of lewd comments and verbal harassment, which culminated in an incident around Jan. 24, 1993, when Harth attended a business meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club and estate in Palm Beach, Florida. In Harth’s recounting, Trump kept her from leaving and “forcibly removed” her to a bedroom, where he subjected her to “unwanted sexual advances, which included touching of plaintiff’s private parts in an act constituting attempted ‘rape.'”

Harth later dropped the complaint. In 1998, she began a months-long consensual relationship with Trump. When asked by Times columnist Nicolas Kristof why she would agree to date a man she had accused of attempted rape, she said she was in the midst of a divorce and was scared, “thinking, ‘what am I going to do now?”

“When he called me and tried to work on me again, I was thinking maybe I should give this a try, maybe if he’s still working on me, I should give this rich guy a chance,” Harth told Kristof last October.

Trump spokesperson Hope Hicks told Kristof that Trump “denies each and every statement made by Ms. Harth.” At the time, the campaign also released e-mails that they said discredited Harth’s account, including messages in which Harth asks for jobs doing Trump’s hair and makeup.

Over the years, and in Kristof’s column, Harth has stood by her initial claim of harassment and assault. She spoke most recently with the Guardian about her experiences, saying Trump had pulled off “the biggest con possible” in winning the presidency.

Lisa Bloom

✔@LisaBloom
Replying to @LisaBloom
Powerful learning experience last week. I always tell my clients to ignore the hate, but now I truly get their pain.

Jill Harth @jillharth

Sad you had to go through it. My pain is everyday with bastard Trump as President. No one gets it unless it happens to them. NO one!

 

Any response to him saying that he likes to grab them by the *****?

 

Mohammad raped children.

Lets "revisit" that.

:Leftists are so easily taken for a ride.

I wish I had bought stock in the company that makes pink vagina hats.

I could be out there right now selling them for $50 a pop and retire in a month.

/angryfist

 

But what about Hillary and those emails.... Now back to that that Russian dossier? And then we can talk about how she fixed the primaries...

Lets not distract from what is important. Mohammed and his sex crimes.

 

Trump could literally shoot someone in Times Square ... Trump FanBoys wouldn't care.
It's like the guy who made a thread stating that even if Moore was guilty of child abuse - he wouldn't care because the Democrats would ... whatever.

The Moral Majority is dead ... long live the Trump FanBoys.

 

The moral majority was neither the majority, nor especially moral. I am old enough to remember them.

 

So an ex-girlfriend accuses him of assaulting her before he became her boyfriend? I think we have a case of sour grapes, not sexual harassment.

 

What I've noticed is that rich people tend to attract more lawsuits because the expectation is they have the money to pay off a quick out of court settlement.

 

The deflect from Al Franken campaign seems to be revving up.

 

The above pretty much does speak for itself. True sexual assault victims look to create distance from their abusers. They're disgusted and traumatized at a level that precludes further contact. As an example, much of what we saw in the legitimate assault situation between Leeann Tweeden and Al Franken.

Jill Harth seemed far more motivated to "give this rich guy a chance" than pursue being violated by Trump. My feeling is that at that point, she gave up any moral claims of sexual assault. You can't have it both ways. Why do you see it different?

 

Teflon Trump will not be critiqued by his loyal minions no matter what happens. Shortly we will likely see details from Meuller that would make a grown man cry but Trump will still be worshipped...he was correct about the 5th avenue comment.

The saddest part is that when he is removed from office and prosecuted they will then claim he was framed.

 

Well no, this is a thread about the President and sexual misconduct, so that is what we'd normally discuss in this thread. Maybe this is the moment you bring up a Hillary scandal.

 

Defense? Nah, just a simple explanation, just because crazed hysterical libs and progs have been in bed for decades with countless number of sexual predators, rapists and child molesters does not mean that a legitimately elected choice of the American people should step down.

 

Franken has admitted what he did and apologized... Trump has a long, long track record of bad behavior with women.

 

I actually admire this new [completely idiotic] liberal spin: we (the libs) have elected, supported and defended rapists and sexual predators for decades so Trump should resign

 

Gee what timing...

 

Who cares if apologized. He admitted doing it. If you care about Women, he goes. If you don't, he stays.