5 videos to put the "therm*te" argument to bed.

Discussion in '9/11' started by cjnewson88, Mar 10, 2013.

  1. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Of the many videos refuting the 9/11 truther's therm*te argument, I believe these 5 make the best case. The first was removed by youtube for apparently giving instructions on how to make a bomb, so it will needed to be downloaded via the link provided.

    1. The Thermite Conspiracy - Part 1 (Click Here To Download)



    2. The Thermite Conspiracy - Part 2
    [video=youtube;SMvz3taoMnU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMvz3taoMnU[/video]



    3. "9/11 was an insect job!"
    [video=youtube;1qROovaGUEI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qROovaGUEI[/video]



    4. Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 2 of 7 - Nano-thermite found in the WTC dust
    [video=youtube;wbjYoINw5oI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbjYoINw5oI[/video]



    5. Debunking 9/11 conspiracy theorists part 3 of 7 -Thermate, thermite and glowing Aluminium
    [video=youtube;ymFYBijuqJw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymFYBijuqJw[/video]



    Enjoy
     
  2. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    give it up.you have been owned and taken to school and lost every argument by truthers sense day one you got here from that blog showing off arronce of Im right and everyone else is wrong with that pathetic lie-Im right,your wrong get over it,when all that stuff in that blog of yours is all old stuff that has ben debunked time and time again by experts,you were owned and taken to school on that,and you were exposed with that pathetic video that lies and doesnt counter any of that five minute video so know one is going to listen to these latest lies of your either.
     
  3. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Cool story. I'm looking forward to the part where you admit the science behind the Bentham paper is junk.
     
  4. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I just got done handing your arse to you on a platter on your other thread exposing your blatant lies you and your boss created on that 15 minute that fails miserably to debunk that five minute video along with the help of Holston and others as well

    .you failed miserably on that thread in that blog and you failed miserably in that video so nobody is going to listen to your pathetic posts full of lies and b.s anymore.you have been exposed that you have NO INTEREST in the truth!!!!!!! and are just here to slander it.
     
  5. upside-down cake

    upside-down cake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2012
    Messages:
    5,442
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I think the problem is that people and mainstream media love arguing with average, everyday truthers (soft targets) and do not respond to the more knowledgeable professionals who claim to have an alternate view of the events. They have usually been marginalized out of the equations. This aside from assessing the voluminous lies piled on top of 9/11 that led itself that led us into Iraq makes you certainly revisit the authenticity of each step.

    While, perhaps, a complete story cannot be mapped out, in the least 9/11 is a story full of holes. It would be one thing to point and laugh at what you consider kooks and crazies, but the odder thing is that media has taught us to instinctively laugh at such people as kooks and crazies. But by no means are they all kooks or crazies...

    http://www.mo911truth.org/
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,796
    Likes Received:
    157
    Trophy Points:
    63
    When two groups of experts say opposite things, that's usually a sign that one of the groups has sold out and is trying to obfuscate an issue.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DMYZaiwBC0

    This post is from a thread on a different topic but it's about how the government can always find plenty of scientist willing to sell out and lie.
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487&page=37&p=4731597&viewfull=1#post4731597

    There is already a ton of other proof that 9/11 was an inside job...
    http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144746

    ...so this issue isn't about whether the government did it. It's about how the government did it.

    Here's a post I made on another thread.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...erican-77-hit-pentagon-56.html#post1062380451
     
  7. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I'm interesting in keeping to topic, something you have failed to do so far on this thread, and on the other. I have suggested to you, more than once, that if you wish to be proven wrong on your points bought up off topic in the Pentagon thread, you should begin your own.

    So, keeping on topic, what did you think of the 5 videos I posted?
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Regarding video number two, first section:

    The lack of scientific process is certainly troubling, considering their 'results'.
     
  9. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Although I do not personally have much issue with Mark, I do remember watching a presentation of him standing in front of an EDX analysis of his sample which showed less than 2% Al and claiming it is thermite. That made me chuckle.

    Apparently so can the 'Truth' movement. Why don't you ask Jones and Farrer to release their FTIR and TEM data? They've refuse for 4 years now, even after Millette's FTIR and TEM data both confirmed the red/gray chips contain no elemental Al > No thermite.

    Off topic and irrelevant. This thread is questioning the legitimacy of the work of truthers, not the work of the 'official' story.

    This thread is questioning the 'truth'ers belief for the latter. Do you think thermite bought down the towers? If so, in your opinion how do you think it was used? The authors of the Bentham paper still admit they have no idea.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,633
    Likes Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    83
    begging the question does not make a bonafide case, PLONK
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Man...if we could only get some "official" science and a real investigation we could resolve this whole "official" BS crap once and for all. They won't address it though.....much too volatile a subject.
     
  12. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    edit dupe
     
  13. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    There is no such thing as "official" science. One either employs the scientific method properly or they don't. Therein lies the Truther dilemma.
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Obviously there IS an "official" science as the team refers to their science valid and anyone's who disagrees is invalid. Therein lies the paradox.
     
  15. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Consider your hair parted Fraud. Yet again.
     
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's clever NA.... Non relevant, but clever.
     
  17. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It's completely relevant, considering you clearly didn't understand my post.

    Nor how the scientific method works either.
     
  18. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Relevance is all relevant I suppose.
     
  19. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Except where pseudo-science is involved. Then it's irrelevant.
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what I've been trying to say all along.
     
  21. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Yet you are incapable of distinguishing between the two? Yet another square peg/round hole response from you 'Fraud.
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm very capable of distinguishing the difference between propaganda and science. That's why I'm a truther. Thanks again NA
     
  23. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So YouTube videos are only valid when used by debunkers?
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That for me?
     
  25. Jango

    Jango New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    2,683
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No.

    /tenchar
     

Share This Page