Hi Can any one tell me were I can find the CCTV evidence at Boston and Newark international airPort ? 3 of the flights did originate from these airports Which took part of the attacks.
It can just as easily be genuine as well......But everyone is lying in the truthers world,aren't they?
Only if it goes against their theories. If what is said supports their theories, no matter how weak or circumstantial the evidence may be, it is the stone cold truth.
Well, many seem to accept the "official" theory based on that same criteria. All in perspective I suppose.
No insult was given......I just realized arguing with truthers is just like arguing with drunk teenagers,so I'll treat you like one
The original news reports have the footage, I've seen it many times. Here, start watching: http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive
No, the criteria that supports the "official" theory is physical and scientific evidence and the "test of reasonableness" if you will, unclouded by a venomous hatred of George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield and others in the government. Mind you, I'm not saying that the US government has never done anything wrong or has never lied to or misled the American citizens. I'm saying that when looking at ALL the evidence and facts that the "official" story is way more plausible than all of the competing "truther" theories.
Thanks for anwearing - it's like trying to get blood from a stone on this forum ! Yes I am aware of the CCTV at Dulles airport The CCTV footage from Boston and Newark airport is the one I am after ! I have googled it and have zero results ! Can you help ? Does it even exist ( as it's not on google ?)
I agree I don't think the bull story " truther " come up with like for example The planes used were cgi creations / However I have also seen no evidence in form of CCTV of these hijackers ever being at the airports ( namely Boston and Newark airport )
But what does that prove or disprove? That they were never there? Where are the cameras located? Is it possible that someone was in front of them when they passed in front of the cameras? Are there "dead spots" in the camera coverage? Is there a camera at each gate that records the passengers as they walk single file through the line? What does the absence of CCTV evidence prove?
Against what? Air attacks? Yes, I think its quite plausible. Well most demolition companies don't have jumbo jets at their disposal and want to preserve as many collateral buildings as possible. No but apparently you do. The hijackers were state side and Osama was found and killed in a safehouse.
It wouldn't surprise me if the cameras were out. There hadn't been a hijacking from the US in what 25 years prior to 9/11. Who cared prior to 9-11-01?
Really?? L'Ambiance Plaza in 1987 'March 1986, the Lian Yak building The Ronan Point apartment building collapse in England in 1968 http://www.911myths.com/html/progressive_collapse.html Evidence? Sources?
There are videos of planes taking off from Reagan National that vector very close to (if not directly over) the Pentagon itself. I think they considered it but didn't install AA batteries for that purpose seeing as how a hijacked plane looks very much like a non-hijacked plane from the outside--where the AA batteries are. As for my gullibility, if you call rooting your hypothesis in facts gullible, then I'm guilty as charged. I'll make the same challenge to you that I make to every twoofer. Currently, I'm 133-0 in non-responses and not coincidentally the movement has gone nowhere in the entire life span of those chickening out. Regale us with your tale of what went down. Enlighten us with your story of what happened. Here comes 134.
And someone has been reduced to one-liner responses instead of reasoned replies. And only after two of my posts. He he he.
Actually, only 2 buildings were hit by a plane (WTC1 and WTC2). The third building, WTC7 collapsed without any plane hitting it. Oh, I'm sorry. The "official" BS story goes something like this. One corner caught fire, burned up the rest of the building, everybody expected it to collapse, and then it collapsed 9 hours later, but prior to a LIVE report by the BBC saying some 20 minutes EARLIER, that WTC7 had collapsed before it collapsed with the building standing proudly over the "reporters" left shoulder. I kid you not. Google it.
No...nobody thought of that at all. LOL Cheney was underground since like 9:08, hiding from the carnage, but, the Pentagon, (the heart of the ultimate military power) hadn't considered that. LOL Too funny
Make it a thousand and I'll play. Should be a cakewalk for you, with a stupid twoofer like me and all. What do you say sport?
great where is it then? I have been waiting to get my hands on some real evidence that supports the official fantasy
