http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLqGRv7CQlc Where are the raging fires? And why does it look like a bomb has gone off downstairs? Where is all the furniture? Thoughts?
Humanity has undergone too much NLP and behavioral conditioning to ever unify for the cause truth. You've posed a question which can easily be answered, but never will be. Imperialism has conquered the free will of man, and our only hope is complete eradication of all govt. Until that day, we shall suffer.
A great post, if a little morbid. It is dangerous to think about such things, because quite obviously you are right, and that is knowledge which nobody really wants. Although, I don't think merely eradicating government would solve a great deal because they work for the banking system the same as everybody else.
You won't get any serious responses to your inquiry, for the specialists here. I'll offer a suggestion though, on the second part. Why does it look like a bomb went off? Because, that's what happened. Walks like a duck, well...
You showed esentially 2 rooms of a 47 story building and asked where the fires are. I would thing the answer obvious - in another part of the building. You make the strange assumption that a bomb must have gone off to produce all that dust, smoke and debris and yet the building stands currently unshaken. The video claims minutes before the building collapsed and yet the building did not collapse until well after the evacuation had occurred. And according to the two men speaking the evacuation is just now complete. It does not help your case that the video is taken from the side opposite the side that was struck by a large chunk of The North Tower gouging out a wedge shaped section of the building at least 10 stories high and a few scores of feet wide at it's base.
Uh, really? You expect a video that doesn't look up at WTC7 even once to prove that there were no fires on the upper floors? Here's a "science" tip that should be common sense for anyone: if you have a theory, try disproving it yourself before putting it out there. Not that hard. There are pictures and videos all over the internet showing fires. Here's just one example http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056088/Footage-kills-conspiracy-theories-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
The only responses he will get here is proof through mountains of evidence and logic, easily obtainable on the internet, that destroy these conspiracy theories. But I wouldn't say these theories don't receive inquiry. I'm sure in the suburbs of Damascus, or maybe Tehran, or especially in the tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan, these theories are given serious discussion. Which is why those same areas have either very restricted internet access, or people outright opposing the internet even being available (much like they shoot little girls in the face for wanting education available). Because then their falsehoods fall apart through reason and information. But no, I wouldn't say these 9/11 conspiracy theories are receiving zero attention, just not here.
Well I suppose that's true, but only because I don't like absurd lies which insult the intelligence of the human race.
The only people providing evidence and applying logic here is us. You are merely referring to it without ever showing any. Indeed, given that no steel-framed high rise building has ever collapsed through fire in the entire recorded history of man, how are you ever hoping to prove it? You have nothing to compare it to for reference. Dutch demolitions expert Danny Jowenko took literally one look at WTC 7 collapsing, and said: "This is controlled demolition. Without a doubt. A team of experts did this." Yet NIST, who you are trying to convince me is armed with "mountains of evidence and logic", did not conduct one single, solitary test for explosives. Furthermore, it tried to cover this up, by initially responding to enquiries about controlled demolition with the public statement: "NIST found no evidence that explosives had been used." People actually had to force NIST to admit that they had not tested for them, and that is because Shyam Sunder is a charlatan and a crook. You have no argument, just mythical references to non-existent evidence and straw man arguments. It's pathetic. Literally pathetic that you do not have the capability to understand how stupid your words are.
