Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Aug 14, 2011.
(*)(*)(*)(*) straight it was an inside job!!!!!!!!!!!
Then it tipped over?
show your data that is was not in the same direction of gravity save internal tumbling.
Irrelevant (as usual) while you refocus the issue (as usual). FREE FALL.
That's the issue.
yep he is headed for a dead end anyway. LOL
I haven't "refocused" anything. I directly answered a question. You Deniers should try it sometime.
I still haven't seen any proof to the silly nonsense that free fall can "only" occur when a building is demolished with explosives. As if gravity doesn't apply to burning buildings.
burning buildings would be a natural collapse not a demolition.
thank you for demonstrating you do not know the difference
The buildings at WTC did not 'burn' so much as they 'disintegrated'.
Point:demolition would occur from the burning itself,Or do you contend that a building afire is a NATURAL event?
you do not understand the nature of the matter.
explain the difference between a natural collapse and a demolition
Easily....natural collapse would be due to a deficiency in the structural integrity,a demolition would occur through outside forces,such as fire,wind,seismic events and flood
not according to nist definition, that is incorrect, my assessment is in accord with nist
cite your source
what good does it do?
I already cited it and you never bothered to click the kink did you?
check out what random chance can do man!
Hell if I could find crew that can do this I would go into the demo biz tomorrow!
Now aint that just purrrrrrrrrrrrfect?
common sense would tell you since it went up that way,it would come down the same way.
And drawing arbitrary lines on a picture means nothing....
Gravity is not random.
Steel columns aren't random either. They don't melt and they generally offer some sort of resistance. That would tend to get in the way of FREE FALL, I would think. I didn't realize free fall could occur through solid steel.
Since none of the buildings came down in free fall, your point is pointless.
NIST admitted FREE FALL. I guess you missed that point.
NIST did not admit that any of the buildings fell in free fall. One portion of one corner is not the whole building.
Why can't 'truthers' tell the truth?
NIST changed the report. They originally said the opposite.
Why can't NIST supporters tell the truth?
Wrong - you make this up as you go along don't you?
I should have just added never ending notes to my report. Sorry. I'm not good with this "official" style story telling.
"officially" ? I can't talk about it. It's classified.
did they have like 10 trillion little invisible gremlins labors trying to set a world record for hirise disassembly?
I have seen weak before but why waste your energy, you need it for survival
Separate names with a comma.