A brief analysis of WTC 1 : Initial catastrophic failure.

this is about your math which is based on bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and grand generalities

who can take you seriously

great parlor talk over tea though

 

this is about your math which is based on bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and grand generalities

Point out the bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and generalities.

 

Nobody who reads the OP with any semblance of comprehension would make that claim.

 

ah, so you're full of it.

 

sure they would and the would include even more impossible cant happen crap.

 

So, the floor (clearly) sagging......means nothing, right?

 

The math is all there in the OP.

Where's yours?

 

seriously, its useless to debate someone who says there were no fires in the WTC towers.

 

so you are blind?

 

Really?....what in the OP is impossible. Be specific, twoofer.

- - - Updated - - -

I must be!....Please show me!

 

It means a lot. Which floor was "clearly" sagging?

 

it means magic aliens from druidia used space heaters to invisibly heat the floor so it would sag.

then again maybe just maybe the DOD has a new invisible fire weapon they wanted to test out. Since there is no fire in the vicinity and the floor is sagged that would be an invisible fire weapon.

I want to try it on a weenee roast.

But I am sure you have a great explanation for that miracle as well right?

invisible fire.

 

Yeah, that's it!....Couldn't at all be from the fires that on the damaged floors....yeah....couldn't be that. Are you really that dishonest? (Rhetorical question)

 

I'd like to see you use such humor at a meeting of victims' family members.

or infront of some FDNY.

i wonder what would happen.

 

what fires? I dont see any fire below the sagged floor or do you think it was the duetche bank had a fire and it telepathically transferred its heat to inflict the sag?

 

the American Society of Civil Engineers is smarter than all of us.

 

I guess the NYFD is in on it also.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/911/FIRE9.pdf

- - - Updated - - -

so, those orange spots in those photos, those aren't fires....right?

You lost this debate the min you made your first post.

 

You don't? I sure do.

 

if you want t a floor to sag you put the heat below it not next door, there is no fire in the red circle on the pic where it would have to be to heat the floor to make it sag and that is a fact I checked the color mapping! LMAO



come on you all need to do better than simply trying to bull(*)(*)(*)(*) your way through this LOL

 

koko is just silly enough to think that once a fire moves away from an area its burned through, that area just goes back to normal like nothing happened.

 

nice story, got a pic of the fire there?

hell it could have been there in 2010 and was evicted for nonpayment of rent!

If you dont have apic showing fire it wasnt there and there are other ways than fire below the floor to make a floor sag.

no pic = invisible fire.

 

All truthers want to argue about is pictures. What else can they argue about when they don't understand the math that describes the collapse?

As for taking quotes out of context, it was a nice try, but the silliness of that statement didn't top the irony of the first one. The first is still champion of the day. Poor Newton must not have known that the math took a back seat to the enlightenment provided by the animated .gif image format.

 

I have been telling truthers this for years - Listen they wont

 

thats all you need is pictures to prove something claimed by the government is fraud. thats all it took for chandler to force nist to correct the false report.

I think you people live in your own little dream world and out of touch with reality, just like the psychologists said about you all.

throwing a bunch of numbers around isnt math, nor is microscoping or dry labbing that you people are so famous for.

 

You've never heard of thermal conductivity? Do you burn yourself every time you make breakfast?